 But he is restrained; not because the public have occasion to make the like use, or to make any use of the property, or to take any benefit or profit to themselves from it; but because it would be a noxious use, contrary to the maxim, "Sic utere tuo,...  The New York Supplement - Page 7081904Full view - About this book
 | Rhode Island. Supreme Court - Law reports, digests, etc - 1899 - 942 pages
...but because it would be a noxious use, contrary to the maxim, sic utere tuo ut alienum non lcedas. It is not an appropriation of the property to a public...property taken under the right of eminent domain." In the words of Mr. Justice Harlan, in the Slaughter House Cases, 14 Wall. 36, 62, " This power is,... | |
 | Ragnhildur Helgadóttir - Religion - 2006 - 297 pages
...but because it would be a noxious use, contrary to the maxim, sic utere tuo, ut alienum non laedas. It is not an appropriation of the property to a public...property taken under the right of eminent domain." See also Horwitz, supra note 27, pp. 28-29. 85 See Commonwealth v. Alger, 61 Mass. p. 86. 86 See Mugler,... | |
| |
