 But he is restrained; not because the public have occasion to make the like use, or to make any use of the property, or to take any benefit or profit to themselves from it; but because it would be a noxious use, contrary to the maxim, "Sic utere tuo,...  The New York Supplement - Page 7081904Full view - About this book
 | Law reports, digests, etc - 1905 - 992 pages
...but because it would be a noxious use, contrary to the maxim, M'e viere tuo vt alitnum non lœda». It is not an appropriation of the property to a public...property taken under the right of eminent domain." Com. v. Alger, 7 C'ush. 53, 84-f-6. The universal doctrine on the subject is nowhere more clearly stated... | |
 | Law reports, digests, etc - 1905 - 986 pages
...have in thickly settled communities been a very common mailer lor tbe exercise of (he police power. It is common knowledge that the condition in which they shall be kept when allowed to exisi, iheir construction, their locality, the time aud manner of removing Iheir contents, have,... | |
 | Thomas Johnson Michie - Law reports, digests, etc - 1906 - 856 pages
...it, but because it would be a noxious use contrary to the maxim sic utere tuo ut alienum non Ixdas. It is not an appropriation of the property to a public...property taken under the right of eminent domain. This distinction is manifest in principle and is recognized by unquestioned authority." Richmond, etc.,... | |
 | North Carolina. State Board of Health - Public health - 1907 - 182 pages
...but because it would be a noxious use, contrary to the maxim, sic utere tuo, ut alienum non laedas. It is not an appropriation of the property to a public...property taken under the right of eminent domain." A case directly in point is State v. Streeper, 5 NJL, 115. The very contention made in this case that... | |
 | 1917 - 958 pages
...but because It would be a noxious use, contrary to the mnxlm, Sic utere tuo ut allenum non laedas. It Is not an appropriation of the property to a public...property taken under the right of eminent domain. And the New Hampshire Supreme Court said: The universal doctrine on the subject Is nowhere more clearly... | |
 | William Meade Fletcher - Corporation law - 1917 - 1212 pages
...St. Kep. 659, 11 SE 545. tuo, ut atien-um non laedas. It is not an appropriation of the prop^ erty to a public use, but the restraint of an injurious...principle of property taken under the right of eminent domain."80 20 Com. v. Alger, 7 Cush. (Mass.) 53, 84. "A prohibition simply upon the use of property... | |
 | Law - 1920 - 512 pages
...but because it would be a noxious use, contrary to the maxim, sic utere tuo, ut alienum non laedas. It is not an appropriation of the property to a public...restraint of an injurious private use by the owner." (5) 11 Met. 55. Prior to the decision in Munn v. Illinois, the courts generally adopted this maxim... | |
 | New York (N.Y.). Tenement House Department - New York (N.Y.) - 1906 - 296 pages
...but because it would be a noxious use contrary to the maxim, sic utere tuo, ut alienum non laedas. It is not an appropriation of the property to a public...knowledge that the condition in which they shall be kept and allowed to exist, their construction, their locality, the time and manner of removing their contents... | |
 | New York (N.Y.). Tenement House Department - New York (N.Y.) - 1906 - 296 pages
...but because it would be a noxious use contrary to the maxim, sic .utere tuo, ut alienum non laedas. It is not an appropriation of the property to a public...owner and is therefore not within the principle of prpperty taken under the right of eminent domain." And it is said in that case with respect to the... | |
 | Law reports, digests, etc - 1898 - 1200 pages
...HAKRINGTON v. BOARD OF ALDERMEN. S use, contrary to the maxim, 'Sic utere tuo ut alienum non Isedas.' It is not an appropriation of the property to a public...property taken under the right of eminent domain." In the words of Mr. Justice Harían in the Slaughter House Cases, 16 Wall. 36, 62: "This power Is,... | |
| |
