 But he is restrained; not because the public have occasion to make the like use, or to make any use of the property, or to take any benefit or profit to themselves from it; but because it would be a noxious use, contrary to the maxim, "Sic utere tuo,...  The New York Supplement - Page 7081904Full view - About this book
 | Hugo Ziemssen - 1879 - 818 pages
...but because it would be a noxious use, contrary to the maxim sic utere tuo, tit alienum non Icedas. It is not an appropriation of the property to a public...property taken under the right of eminent domain." ' It should be observed that the police powers of the State are for the most part exercised to secure... | |
 | Law reports, digests, etc - 1898 - 1132 pages
...because it would be a noxious use, contrary to the maxim, 'Sic utere tuo ut alieiiuin non laedas.' It is not an appropriation of the property to a public...property taken under the right of eminent domain." In the words of Mr. Justice Harían in the Slaughter House Cases, 16 Wall. 36. 62: "This power Is,... | |
 | Law reports, digests, etc - 1898 - 1148 pages
...maxim, 'Sic ntere tuo ut allenum non lœdas.' It is not an appropriation of the property to a publie use, but the restraint of an injurious private use...property taken under the right of eminent domain." Com. v. Alger, 7 Cush. 63, 84-86. The universal doctrine on the subject is nowhere more clearly stated... | |
 | Isaac Grant Thompson - Law reports, digests, etc - 1886 - 926 pages
...because his own use would be a noxious use, contrary to the maxim, sicvtere tuo af alienum non Icadas. It is not an appropriation of the property to a public use, but the restraint of an injurious private nse by the owner." Sedg. Stat. & Const. Law, 438-9, citing 7 Cush. 53. So that the summary abatement... | |
 | John Lewis - Corporation law - 1892 - 846 pages
...the subjects of the same — and holds that the legislation in question is not an appropriation of property to a public use, "but the restraint of an...property taken under the right of eminent domain." This case is followed in the other Massachusetts cases cited. The learned counsel also contends that... | |
 | Henry Campbell Black - Constitutional law - 1897 - 860 pages
...but because it would be a noxious use, contrary to the maxim, sic utere tuo ut alienum non laedas. ^It is not an appropriation of the property to a public...not within the principle of property taken under the power of eminent domain) The distinction, we think, is manifest in principle, although the facts and... | |
 | Law reports, digests, etc - 1898 - 918 pages
...but because it would be a noxious use, contrary to the maxim, iSie utere tuo vt alienum non leídas. It is not an appropriation of the property to a public...owner, and is, therefore, not within the principle of property'taken under the right of eminent domain." Com. v. Alger, 7 Cush. 53, 84-86. The universal... | |
 | 1900 - 858 pages
...to the maxim, sic utcre tuo, tit alicnum non laedas. It is not an appropriation of the property to n public use. but the restraint of an Injurious private...property taken under the right of eminent domain." A case directly in point Is Slate v. Strecpcr, !> NJL, 115. The very contention made in this case that... | |
 | Abraham Clark Freeman - Law reports, digests, etc - 1901 - 1044 pages
...but because it would be a noxious use, contrary to the maxim, Sic utere tuo ut alienum non laedas. It is not an appropriation of the property to a public...property taken under the right of eminent domain": Commonwealth v. Alger, 7 Cush. 53, 84-86. The universal doctrine on the subject is nowhere more clearly... | |
 | Abraham Clark Freeman - Law reports, digests, etc - 1901 - 1052 pages
...but because it would be a noxious use, contrary to the maxim, Sic utere tuo nt alienum non laedas. It is not an appropriation of the property to a public use, but the restraint of an injurious private nse by the owner, and is therefore not within the principle of property taken under the right of eminent... | |
| |
