 A patent may not be obtained though the invention is not identically disclosed or described as set forth in section 102 of this title, if the differences between the subject matter sought to be patented and the prior art are such that the subject matter...  Patent Law Revision: Hearings, Ninety-third Congress, First Session ... - Page 116by United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on the Judiciary. Subcommittee on Patents, Trademarks, and Copyrights - 1974 - 715 pagesFull view - About this book
 | United States. Court of Customs and Patent Appeals - Customs administration - 1952 - 456 pages
...something unobvious. 35 USC 103. Refusal of a patent is proper, under the new law, as it was under the old, if the differences between the subject matter sought...the prior art are such that the subject matter as a whole would have been obvious at the time the alleged invention was made to a person having ordinary... | |
 | Laura F. Landweber, Erik Winfree - Computers - 2002 - 360 pages
...legal criteria for obtaining a US patent are that the proposed invention be "new" and "useful" and the differences between the subject matter sought...the prior art are such that the subject matter as a whole would [not] have been obvious at the time the invention was made to a person having ordinary... | |
 | Peter S. Canelias - Law - 2001 - 736 pages
...be applied by you in considering the validity of each of the patents herein issue is to determine if "the subject matter sought to be patented and the prior art are such that the subject matter as a whole would have been obvious at the time the invention was made to a person having ordinary skill... | |
 | Lanning G. Bryer, Melvin Simensky - Business & Economics - 2002 - 456 pages
...person of ordinary skill in the art when the invention was made.41 A patent is invalid for obviousness if: the differences between the subject matter sought...ordinary skill in the art to which said subject matter pertains.42 The ultimate question of obviousness is a question of law.43 Despite this fact, factual... | |
 | Michael A. Epstein, Frank L. Politano - Law - 2002 - 1044 pages
...[4] Nonobviousness Section l03 of the l952 Patent Act precludes an inventor from obtaining a patent if the differences between the "subject matter sought...the prior art are such that the subject matter as a whole would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to which said subject matter pertains."l70... | |
 | Peter Toren - Law - 2003 - 916 pages
...the invention is not identically disclosed or described as set forth in section 102 of this title, if the differences between the subject matter sought...in the art to which said subject matter pertains." 9 The Supreme Court in Graham v. John Deere Co., 383 US 1, 17, 86 S.Ct. 684, 15 L.Ed.2d 545 (1966)... | |
 | Brian Cain - Law - 2003 - 296 pages
...though the invention is not identically disclosed or described as set forth in s.102 of this title, if the differences between the subject matter sought...in the art to which said subject matter pertains. Patentability shall not be negatived by the manner in which the invention was made. (b) (1) Notwithstanding... | |
 | John R. Koza - Computers - 2003 - 632 pages
...obtaining a US patent are that the proposed invention be “new' “useful,” “improved,” and that “...the differences between the subject matter sought...the prior art are such that the subject matter as a whole would [not] have been obvious at the time the invention was made to a person having ordinary... | |
 | Ashish Ghosh, Shigeyoshi Tsutsui - Computers - 2002 - 1042 pages
...for obtaining a US patent are that the proposed invention be “new” and “useful” and “... the differences between the subject matter sought...the prior art are such that the subject matter as a whole would [not] have been obvious at the time the invention was made to a person having ordinary... | |
| |
