 A patent may not be obtained though the invention is not identically disclosed or described as set forth in section 102 of this title, if the differences between the subject matter sought to be patented and the prior art are such that the subject matter...  Patent Law Revision: Hearings, Ninety-third Congress, First Session ... - Page 116by United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on the Judiciary. Subcommittee on Patents, Trademarks, and Copyrights - 1974 - 715 pagesFull view - About this book
 | United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on the Judiciary - 1960 - 900 pages
...invention. This is for the reason that, even though an invention Is "new and useful" it is not patentable "if the differences between the subject matter sought...the prior art are such that the subject matter as a whole would have been obvious at the time the Invention was made to a person having ordinary skill... | |
 | United States. Department of the Army - Government purchasing - 1961 - 346 pages
...the invention is not identically disclosed or described as set forth in section 102 of this title, if the differences between the subject matter sought...in the art to which said subject matter pertains. Patentability shall not be negatived by the manner in which the invention was made. July 19, 1952,... | |
 | United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on the Judiciary - Antitrust law - 1961 - 1442 pages
...obtained though the invention is not identically disclosed or described as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the subject matter sought...the prior art are such that the subject matter as a whole would have been obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which said subject matter... | |
 | United States. Congress. Senate. Judiciary - Antitrust law - 1961 - 1928 pages
...identically disclosed or described a; forth in section 102, if the differences between the subject mi sought to be patented and the prior art are such that the snl matter as a whole would have been obvious to a person having < nary skill in the art to which said... | |
 | United States. Congress. House. Committee on the Judiciary - Antitrust law - 1962 - 938 pages
...obtained though the invention is not identically disclosed or described as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the subject matter sought...the prior art are such that the subject matter as a whole would have been obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which said subject matter... | |
 | United States. Congress. House. Committee on the Judiciary - 1962 - 934 pages
...obtained though the invention is not identically disclosed or described as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the subject matter sought...the prior art are such that the subject matter as a whole would have been obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which said subject matter... | |
 | United States. Court of Claims, Audrey Bernhardt - Law reports, digests, etc - 1963 - 954 pages
...validity of the patent by arguing that the differences between the subject matter of the claims in issue and the prior art are such that the subject matter as a whole would have been obvious in about 1966 to a person having ordinary skill in the transponder and... | |
 | Raymond F. Clapp - Drug trade - 1966 - 102 pages
...obtained, though the invention is not identically disclosed or described as set forth in Section 102, if the differences between the subject matter sought...the prior art are such that the subject matter as a whole would have been obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which said subject matter... | |
 | Raymond F. Clapp - Drug trade - 1966 - 108 pages
...described as set forth in ction 102, if the differences between the subject matter sought to be tented and the prior art are such that the subject matter as a whole uld have been obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art to ich said subject matter... | |
| |
