 | Orlando Bump - Constitutional law - 1878 - 424 pages
...upon any executive officer any duty it may think proper, which is not repugnant to any right which is secured and protected by the Constitution; and in...responsibility grow out of and are subject to the control of law. Kendall v. US 12 Pet. 524; s. C. 5 Cranch CC 163 ; Marbury v. Madison, 1 Cranch, 137. Congress... | |
 | United States. Congress. House - United States - 1881
...Executive Department, the discharge of which is under the direction of the President. 15ut it would beau alarming doctrine, that Congress cannot impose upon...rights secured and protected by the Constitution; and his duty and responsibility in such cases grow out of and remain subject to the control of the law,... | |
 | United States. Circuit Courts, Albert J. Brunner - Law reports, digests, etc - 1884 - 742 pages
...officers of the executive department, the discharge of which is under the direction of the President. But it would be an alarming doctrine that Congress cannot...the Constitution ; and in such cases the duty and the responsibility grow out of, and are subject to, the control of the law, and not to the direction... | |
 | David Dudley Field - Law - 1884
...money as due to them. The Court said that — "It would be an alarming doctrine that Congress can not impose upon any executive officer any duty they may think proper, which is not repngnant to any rights secured and protected by the Constitution ; and in such cases, the duty and... | |
 | Andrew Jackson Baker - Constitutional law - 1891 - 279 pages
...to their political duties they are under his direction. But the congress may impose ou such officers any duty they may think proper, which is not repugnant...protected by the constitution ; and in such cases the duties grow out of and are subject to the control of the law and not to the discretion of the president... | |
 | John Houston Merrill, Charles Frederic Williams, Thomas Johnson Michie, David Shephard Garland - Law - 1895
...may, however, be cases in which the conduct of such officers is subject to examination by the courts, think proper which is not repugnant to any rights...of, and are subject to, the control of the law, and interfere to control it. Gaines r. Thompson, 7 Wall. (US) 347. The Secretary of the Navy is the organ... | |
 | United States - Military law - 1898
...doctrine that. Congress can not impose upon any executive otlieer any duty they may think proj»er, which is not repugnant to any rights secured and protected by the Constitution, and. in «uch ease-*, tin* duty' and responsibility grow out of and are subject to the control of the law and... | |
 | Law reports, digests, etc - 1898
...mandamus if Congress saw fit to give the jurisdiction." The court, in its opinion in this case, said: "But it would be an alarming doctrine that Congress cannot impose upon any execuiive officer any duty they may think proper which is not repugnant to any rights secured and protected... | |
 | 1899
...the court, per Thompson. J., " the discharge of which is under the direction of the president. But it would be an alarming doctrine that congress cannot impose upon any executive officer any duty tuey may think proper, which is not repugnant to any rights secured and protected by the Constitution;... | |
 | United States. Army. Office of the Judge Advocate General - Military law - 1901 - 393 pages
...under the direction of the President. But it would IK- an alarming doctrine, that Congress can not impose upon any executive officer any duty they may think proper, which is not repuunaut to any rights secured and protected by the Constitution; and in Mich cases, the duty and... | |
| |
But it would be an alarming doctrine, that congress cannot impose upon any executive officer any duty they may think proper, which is not repugnant to any right secured and protected by the constitution; and in such cases, the duty and responsibility... 
