 | United States. Congress. House Rules - 1973 - 330 pages
...constitution, and entirely inadmissible."18 Also to the point, apparently, is the Court's conclusion that it is "an alarming doctrine, that congress cannot impose...rights secured and protected by the constitution. . . ." " a Net reduction, after subtracting a $6.9 billion increase ln exempted and exceptcd areas,... | |
 | United States. Congress. House. Committee on Rules - Legislative hearings - 1973 - 958 pages
...and entirely inadmissible."' 1 " Also to the point, apparently, is the Court's conclusion that it is "an alarming doctrine, that congress cannot impose...rights secured and protected by the constitution. . . ." " u Net reduction, after subtracting a $6.9 billion increase in exempted and excepted areas,... | |
 | United States. Congress. Senate. Government Operations - 1973 - 1172 pages
...to dispense with the operation of law upon a subordinate executive officer : When Congress imposes upon any executive officer any duty they may think...any rights secured and protected by the Constitution ... in such cases, the duty and responsibility grow out of and are sn!>ject to the control of the law,... | |
 | United States. General Accounting Office - Executive impoundment of appropriated funds - 1974 - 56 pages
...officers in the executive department, the discharge of which is under the direction of the President. But it would be an alarming doctrine, that congress cannot...protected by the constitution ; and in such cases, the dutv and responsibility grow out of and are subject to the control of the law, and not to the direction... | |
 | United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on the Judiciary - 1974 - 660 pages
...officers in the executive department, the discharge of which is under the direction of the president. But it would be an alarming doctrine, that congress cannot...protected by the constitution ; and in such cases, the dnt.v and responsibility grow out of and are subject to the control of the law, and not to the direction... | |
 | United States. Congress. House. Committee on the Judiciary - 1975 - 290 pages
...which gave Congress the power to impose certain duties upon the executive branch. The Court stated: But it would be an alarming doctrine that Congress cannot impose upon any executive officer any duty that they may think proper that is not repugnant to the Constitution, and in such case that duty and... | |
| |
But it would be an alarming doctrine, that congress cannot impose upon any executive officer any duty they may think proper, which is not repugnant to any right secured and protected by the constitution; and in such cases, the duty and responsibility... 
