The American Law Review, Volume 50Little, Brown, and Company, 1916 - Law |
From inside the book
Page 108
The Supreme Court rules the question of the reasonableness of the tender was
one of fact for the jury and it lays it down that a passenger need not tender the
exact fare , but , if he tenders a reasonable sum , the carrier must accept it and ...
The Supreme Court rules the question of the reasonableness of the tender was
one of fact for the jury and it lays it down that a passenger need not tender the
exact fare , but , if he tenders a reasonable sum , the carrier must accept it and ...
Page 115
Whether a deer may be lawfully killed today by way of retaliation for the damage
wrought by it yesterday , or whether it may be so killed by way of reprisal for
damage wrought or threatened by other deer , are questions not involved herein ,
and ...
Whether a deer may be lawfully killed today by way of retaliation for the damage
wrought by it yesterday , or whether it may be so killed by way of reprisal for
damage wrought or threatened by other deer , are questions not involved herein ,
and ...
Page 116
ploded by any other means than by a fuse , and appreciated their dangerous
character , were questions of fact to be ... The respondent ' s primary negligence ,
which we have seen was a question for the jury , consisted in abandoining this
cap ...
ploded by any other means than by a fuse , and appreciated their dangerous
character , were questions of fact to be ... The respondent ' s primary negligence ,
which we have seen was a question for the jury , consisted in abandoining this
cap ...
Page 122
The ultimate question is , can a manufacturer of motor cars escape liability for an
injury occasioned by a grossly defective wheel by proving that he purchased the
wheel from a reputable manufacturer ? I think this question must be answered in
...
The ultimate question is , can a manufacturer of motor cars escape liability for an
injury occasioned by a grossly defective wheel by proving that he purchased the
wheel from a reputable manufacturer ? I think this question must be answered in
...
Page 131
Commenting upon the New Jersey case shortly after it was decided , we
remarked : The question would seem to be 29 Hatch v . Potter , 2 Gilman 725 . 40
28 S . E . R . 547 . peculiarly within the province of a jury to determine ,
CURRENT ...
Commenting upon the New Jersey case shortly after it was decided , we
remarked : The question would seem to be 29 Hatch v . Potter , 2 Gilman 725 . 40
28 S . E . R . 547 . peculiarly within the province of a jury to determine ,
CURRENT ...
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
action American appear applied attorney authority become brought called cause charge church civil claim common considered Constitution contempt contract corporation course criminal decided decision defendant determine doctrine duty effect England English evidence executive exercise exist fact Federal force foreign German give given Governor hand held hold House important injury interest judge judgment judicial jurisdiction jury Justice land lawyer legislative Legislature limits Lord matter means ment nature necessary neutral never operation opinion party passed peace person plaintiff practice present principle protection question reason regard relation respect result rule society statute suit Supreme Court taken term things tion trial true United violation vote York