Section 502 (f) of the act provides that a drug shall be deemed to be misbranded : "Unless it labeling bears (1) adequate directions for use; and (2) such adequate warnings against use in those pathological conditions or by children where its use may... Competitive problems in the drug industry: hearings before Subcommittee on ... - Page 10972by United States. Congress. Senate. Select Committee on Small Business. Subcommittee on Monopoly and Anticompetitive Activities, United States. Congress. Senate. Select Committee on Small Business. Subcommittee on Monopoly - 1967 - 15579 pagesFull view - About this book
| DIANE Publishing Company - 1994 - 226 pages
...adequate directions for use; and ) such adequate warnings against use in those pathological condi>ns or by children where its use may be dangerous to health, or gainst unsafe dosage or methods or duration of administration or »plication, in such manner and form,... | |
| Ethan N. Parvis - Drugs - 2002 - 214 pages
...misleading in any particular." Section 502(f) states that a drug will be misbranded . . . "unless its labeling bears (1) adequate directions for use; and...be dangerous to health or against unsafe dosage or by methods or duration of administration or application, in such manner and form, as are necessary... | |
| Richard R. Abood, David B. Brushwood - Drugs - 2005 - 396 pages
...deemed to be misbranded (a) If its labeling is false or misleading in any particular. (f) Unless its labeling bears (1) adequate directions for use; and (2) such adequate warnings against use. . . . Section 201, 21 USC § 321, the "Definition" section of the Act, describes the concept of "misleading"... | |
| United States. Food and Drug Administration - Drugs - 1949 - 1762 pages
...alkaloids present. Both lots of tablets were alleged to be misbranded in that the labeling did not hear adequate warnings against use in those pathological conditions or by children where their use might be dangerous to health and against unsafe dosage and duration of administration, in... | |
| |