...shall not be allowed. Can a man excuse his practices to the contrary because of his religious belief? To permit this would be to make the professed doctrines of religious "Belipf anpp.rinr f,f> fto law of the land, and in effect to permit every djtiy.pn tn hp^ue a law unto...

...they may with practices. If it were otherwise, the professed doctrines or religious beliefs would be superior to the law of the land, and in effect to permit each citizen to become a law unto himself. As was said in State v. Neitzel, 69 Wash., 567-569, which...

...shall not be allowed. Can a man excuse his practices to the contrary because of his religious belief? To permit this would be to make the professed doctrines...could exist only in name under such circumstances." Reynolds v. US, 98 U. S. 145, 166, 25 L. ed. 244. 97. Constitutionality of immunity statutes 2543]....

...shall not be allowed. Can a man excuse his practices to the contrary because of his religious belief? To permit this would be to make the professed doctrines...could exist only in name under such circumstances." 6i State v. Ambs, 20 Mo. 214. 02 4 Bl. Comm. 21. «34 Bl. Comm. 27. 8* 1 Hale PC IS. 05 1 Bish. New...

...very essence. In the language of Chief Justice Waite, in the Eeynolds case, this would in effect ' permit every citizen to become a law unto himself....could exist only in name under such circumstances.' " The majority say on this point: " The principles underlying the second main ground of disqualification,...

...very essence. In the language of Chief Justice Waite, in the Reynolds case, this would in effect ' permit every citizen to become a law unto himself....could exist only in name under such circumstances.' " The majority say on this point : " The principles underlying the second main ground of disqualification,...

...shall not be allowed, can a man excuse his practice to the contrary because of his religious belief? To permit this would be to make the professed doctrines...could exist only in name, under such circumstances." And so, in like manner, I say, a man my reason himself into a conviction of the expediency and patriotic...

...shall not be allowed. Can a man excase bis practices to tbe contrary, because of bis religious belief? To permit this would be to make the professed doctrines of religious belief superior to the law of tbe land, and in effect to permit every citizen to become a law unto himself. Government could exist...

...permit this would be to make the doctrines of religion superior to the law of the land; and in effect be to permit every citizen to become a law unto himself. Government could exist only in name. ... It matters not that his belief was a part of his religion; it was still a belief and a belief only.14...

...the civil government under which he lived could not interfere to prevent a sacrifice? . . . ". . . To permit this would be to make the professed doctrines...permit every citizen to become a law unto himself." Congress then passed an act debarring from the ballot box anyone practicing bigamy or polygamy and...