 | Henry Budd, Ardemus Stewart - Equity - 1896 - 828 pages
...to become the exclusive property of any one. The manufacturer " has no right to appropriate a sign or symbol, which from the nature of the fact it is...-used to signify, others may employ with equal truth, and therefore have an equal right to employ for the same purpose :" Manufacturing Co. v. Trainer, 101... | |
 | Law reports, digests, etc - 1896 - 916 pages
...any one. Egbert v. Lippmann, 104 US 835, 26 L. ed. •755. No one has a right to appropriate a sign .or symbol which from the nature of the fact it is...used to signify others may employ with equal truth, and therefore have an equal right to employ for the same purpose. Delaware <t B. Canal Co. v. Clark,... | |
 | United States - 1897 - 906 pages
...goods, but are only meant to indicate their name or quality. He has no right to appropriate a sign or a symbol which, from the nature of the fact it is used to signify, others may employ with equal truth, and therefore have an equal right to employ for the same purpose. The last sentence is again quoted... | |
 | United States - 1899 - 804 pages
...Spear, (2 Sanclf., 599,) in which it is laid down — that no one has a right to appropriate a sign or symbol which, from the nature of the fact it is...used to signify, others may employ with equal truth, and, therefore, have an equal right to employ for the same purpose — said: It in upon these principles... | |
 | William Mida - Liquor laws - 1899 - 402 pages
...Northern District of Ohio has decided as follows: An individual has no right to appropriate a sign or symbol which, from the nature of the fact it is...used to signify, others may employ with equal truth, and therefore have an equal right to employ for the same purpose. The name "Genesee" points only at... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court - Law reports, digests, etc - 1899 - 790 pages
...Amoxkctig Jffg. Co. v. Spear, 2 Samlf. 599, it is laid down that no one has a right to appropriate a sign or symbol which, from the nature of the fact it is...used to signify, others may employ with equal truth, and, therefore, have an equal right to employ for the same purpose. It is upon these principles that... | |
 | Richards & Co. (New York, N.Y.) - Patents - 1904 - 572 pages
...public, it cannot be registered, see Weisert Bros. 16 OG 680. A person has no right to employ a sign or symbol which, from the nature of the fact it is...used to signify, others may employ with equal truth, and therefore with equal right, see Pratt & Farmer, 10 OG 866. A trade-mark that is descriptive or... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court - Law reports, digests, etc - 1911 - 760 pages
...private monopoly of rubberoid cannot coexist." The court expressed the determined and settled rule to be ns were o complied For this cases were cited and many illustrations were given, which we need not repeat. The definition... | |
 | Appellate courts - 1915 - 734 pages
...446, 31 Sup. Ct. 456, 55 L. Ed. 536, that no one can appropriate as a trade-mark a geographical or generic name, or one descriptive of an article of...used to signify, others may employ with equal truth. The same rule is recognized in Bristol Co. v. Graham, 199 Fed. 412, 117 CCA 644. Rut, on the other... | |
| |
He has no right to appropriate a sign or a symbol, which, from the nature of the fact it is used to signify, others may employ with equal truth, and therefore have an equal right to employ for the same purpose... 
