...practical one better suited to the occasion (see Swift & Co. v. United States, 196 US 375, 398), and that the true test of employment in such commerce in the sense intended is, was the employ^ at the tune of the injury engaged in interstate transportation or in work so closely related...

...out, the Federal Act speaks of interstate commerce in a practical sense suited to the occasion and "the true test of employment in such commerce in the sense intended is, was the employe" at the tune of the injury engaged in interstate transportation or in work so closely related...

...interstate commerce not in a technical, legal sense, hut in a practical sense suited to the occasion, and "the true test of employment in such commerce in the...related to it as to be practically a part of it?" 18 But 6. North Carolina R. Co. v. Zachary, and note; Delaware, etc., R. Co. v. 232 US 248, 34 S. Ct....

...use, when finished, in interstate commerce, does not bring the case within the Federal act. The test is, "Was the employee at the time of the injury engaged...related to it as to be practically a part of it?" Shanks Y. Delaware, L. & W. R, Co. 239 U. 8. 656, 558, 60 L. ed. 436, 433, LRA1916C, 797, 36 Sup. Ct....

...time of the injury must be "employed in interstate commerce" and that the true test of such employment is, "Was the employee at the time' of the injury engaged...closely related to it as to be practically a part of it ?" In each case it was held that the employee was not so engaged. Applying the test laid down in those...

...time of the injury must be "employed in interstate commerce" and that the true test of such employment is, "Was the employee at the time of the injury engaged...related to it as to be practically a part of it?" In each case it was held that the employee was not so engaged. Applying the test laid down in those...

..."employed in interstate commerce," and that the true test of such employment is: "Was the employé at the time of the injury engaged in interstate transportation or in work so closely related to It as to be practica',! y a part of it?" In each case it was held that the employé was not so engnged. Applying...

...to the occasion and the true test of employment in such commerce is, Was the employee at the time of injury engaged in interstate transportation or in...closely related to it as to be practically a part thereof, and under this rule an employee injured while engaged in the removal of coal from the storage...

...test has been thus stated by the Supreme Court of the United States: "Was the employé, at the time ot the injury, engaged in interstate transportation, or in work so closely related to it as to be practicallv a pnrt of it?" Shanks v. Del., Lack. & Wost. R. R,, 239 US 656, 558, 3G Sup. Ct. 188, 189,...

...occasion (see Swift & Co. v. United States, 196 DS 375, 398, 25 Sup. Ct. 276, 49 L. Ed. 518), and that the true test of employment in such commerce in the sense Intended is: Was the employe1 at the time of the injury engaged in interstate transportation, or in work so closely related...