But where the second action between the same parties is upon a different claim or demand, the judgment in the prior action operates as an estoppel only as to those matters in issue or points controverted, upon the determination of which the finding or... Patent and Trade Mark Review - Page 2381922Full view - About this book
| Law reports, digests, etc - 1905 - 1048 pages
...606, 24 L. ed. 214. In all cases -where it is sought to apply the estoppel of a judgment rendered upou one cause of action to matters arising in a suit upon...what might have been thus litigated and determined. Cromwell v. 8чс County, supra. See Freeman, Judgm. § 256. No judgment or decree is evidence in relation... | |
| Jackson Harvey Ralston - 1906 - 500 pages
...t<e brought into litigation lx-tween the parties in proceedings at law, upon any ground whatever. Hut where. the second action between the same parties...what might have been thus litigated and determined. Only upon such matters is the judgment conclusive in another action. (Cromwell r. Sac County, 4 Otto... | |
| French-Venezuelan Mixed Claims Commission, Jackson Harvey Ralston - France - 1906 - 498 pages
...demand, the judgment in the prior action operates as an estoppel only as to those matters in issue ov points controverted, upon the determination of which...what might have been thus litigated and determined. Only upon such matters is the judgment conclusive in another action. (Cromwell r. Sae. County, 4 Otto... | |
| United States. Supreme Court - Law reports, digests, etc - 1906 - 1434 pages
...finding or verdict was rendered. In all cases, therefore, where it is sought to apply the estoppel o'fa judgment rendered upon one cause of action to matters...what might have been thus litigated and determined. Only upon such matters is the judgment conclusive in another action. Louisville, E. <t St. LR Co. v.... | |
| Law reports, digests, etc - 1907 - 1164 pages
...in finding the verdict or rendering the judgment.' Sherman v. Dilley, 3 Nev. 21. * * * In all eases, therefore, where it is sought to apply the estoppel...what might have been thus litigated and determined. Only upon such matters is the judgment conclusive in another action." Again, In section 624, the same... | |
| Law reports, digests, etc - 1907 - 1164 pages
...* * In all cases, therefore, where it is sought to apply the estoppel of a judgment rendered UJKHI one cause of action to matters arising in a suit upon...what might have been thus litigated and determined. Only upon such matters is the judgment conclusive in another action." Again, In section 624, tbe same... | |
| Law reports, digests, etc - 1907 - 1274 pages
...rendered. In all cases, therefore, where it is sought to apply the estoppel of a judgment rendered upon one cause of action, the inquiry must always be as to...what might have been thus litigated and determined. Only upon such matters is the judgment «inclusive in another action." This language Is quoted with... | |
| Abraham Clark Freeman - Law reports, digests, etc - 1907 - 1132 pages
...action in another arising upon a suit upon a different cause of action, the inquiry must always be to the point or question actually litigated and determined in the original action, not what might have been litigated or determined: Riverside County v. Townshend, 120 111. 9, 9 NE 65. The doctrine of res judicata... | |
| Nevada. Supreme Court - Law reports, digests, etc - 1908 - 674 pages
...therefore, where it is sought to apply the estoppel of a judgment Opinion of the C'ourt—Norcross, J. rendered upon one cause of action to matters arising...what might have been thus litigated and determined. Only upon such matters is the judgment conclusive in another action." Again, in section 624, the same... | |
| Abraham Clark Freeman - Law reports, digests, etc - 1908 - 1174 pages
...determination of which the finding or verdict was rendered, the injury [inquiry?] in such case being 'as to the point or question actually litigated and...determined in the original action, not what might have been litigated and determined.' " In Womach v. St. Joseph, 201 Mo. 467, 100 SW 443, 10 LRA, NS, 440, the... | |
| |