 | Forest resources - 1910 - 566 pages
...United States, such stipulation would have been void and inoperative, because the United States have no constitutional capacity to exercise municipal jurisdiction,...except in the cases in which it is expressly granted." But the doctrine so announced that the United States has no general power to take lands within the... | |
 | Samuel Charles Wiel - Riparian rights - 1911 - 1112 pages
...United States, such stipulation would have been void and inoperative, because the United States have no constitutional capacity to exercise municipal jurisdiction,...except in the cases in which it is expressly granted." Pollard v. Hagan, 3 How. (US) 212, 11 L. Ed. 565. Cf. Kansas v. Colorado, 206 U. S. 46, 27 Sup. Ct.... | |
 | Edward Samuel Corwin - Political Science - 1913 - 344 pages
...right and the duty of the United States in the premises. But, said the Court, " The United States have no constitutional capacity to exercise municipal jurisdiction,...except in the cases in which it is expressly granted. If it were true that the United States acquired the whole of Alabama from Spain, no such consequences... | |
 | United States. Congress. House. Committee on the Public Lands - 1914 - 820 pages
...United States such stipulation would have been void and inoperative, because the United States have no constitutional capacity to exercise municipal Jurisdiction,...except In the cases in which It Is expressly granted. ******* " The right of Alabama and every other new State to exercise all the powers of government which... | |
 | United States. Congress. House. Committee on Public Lands - Hydroelectric power plants - 1914 - 828 pages
...United States such stipulation would have been void and inoperative, because the United States have no constitutional capacity to exercise municipal jurisdiction,...elsewhere, except In the cases in which it Is expressly grunted. ******* " The right of Alabama and every other new State to exercise all the powers of government... | |
 | United States - 1914 - 908 pages
...The United States have no constitutional capacity to exercise municipal jurisdiction, eovereignty, or eminent domain, within the limits of a State or elsewhere, except in the cases in which i:, is expressly granted. The same court, in Kansas v. Colorado,8 declared : These arid lands are largely... | |
 | Electronic journals - 1915 - 884 pages
...involving the relation of the United States to certain of its lands within a state: "The United States have no constitutional capacity to exercise municipal jurisdiction,...except in the cases in which it is expressly granted." The same court in Kansas v. Colorado w declared: "These arid lands are largely within the Territories,... | |
 | United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Public Lands - Public lands - 1915 - 958 pages
...United States, snch stipulation would have been void and inoperative, because the United States have no constitutional capacity to exercise municipal jurisdiction,...State or elsewhere except in the cases in which it is especially granted. Another case involving the Mississippi (Withers v. Buckley, 20 How.) was on the... | |
 | Public lands - 1915 - 300 pages
...authorities. You will observe that in the quotation which I have read it is stated that the United States has no constitutional capacity to exercise municipal...sovereignty or eminent domain within the limits of any state or elsewhere, except in the cases in which it is expressly granted by the Constitution. In... | |
| |
States, such stipulation would have been void and inoperative, because the United States have no constitutional capacity to -exercise municipal jurisdiction, sovereignty, or eminent domain within the limits of a State or elsewhere, except in the cases... 
