| Law reports, digests, etc - 1888 - 878 pages
...consideration for which it was made and delivered to Mahoney, etc. To this answer plaintiff demurred, upon the ground that the same did not state facts sufficient to constitute a defense to the action. The demurrer was sustained by the court, with leave to defendants to amend... | |
| Wisconsin. Supreme Court, Abram Daniel Smith, Philip Loring Spooner, Obadiah Milton Conover, Frederic King Conover, Frederick William Arthur, Frederick C. Seibold - Law reports, digests, etc - 1889 - 772 pages
...complaint prayed $10,000 damages, and costs. The defendant demurred to each of said counts separately, on the ground that the same did not state facts sufficient to Guth vs. Lubach. constitute a cause of action. Thereupon the plaintiff moved the court for judgment... | |
| Law reports, digests, etc - 1890 - 1086 pages
...GIEGERICH, J. The defendant on the llth day of April, 1890, served a demurrer to the complaint herein on the ground that the same did not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. Thereafter, and ou the same day, the plaintiff served a notice of trial, to the... | |
| Law reports, digests, etc - 1892 - 936 pages
...company; that we feel certain that the Sun is right, To that complaint the defendant demurred upon the ground that the same did not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. From the order overruling that demurrer, the defendant brings this appeal. Meg»r».... | |
| Indiana. Appellate Court - Law reports, digests, etc - 1892 - 694 pages
...sum of $100. They appealed to the circuit court, and there filed a demurrer to the complaint, upon the ground that the same did not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. The court sustained the demurrer, but " ordered that the defendant pay the costs... | |
| Oklahoma. Supreme Court, Edward Bell Green, Frank Dale, John Henry Burford, Robert Lee Williams, Matthew John Kane, Howard J. Parker, Charles Winfield Van Eaton - Law reports, digests, etc - 1916 - 880 pages
...November, 1912. On November 26, 1912, defendant filed demurrer to the sixth paragraph of plaintiff's reply, on the ground that the same did not state facts sufficient to constitute a defense to the answer and cross-petition. On the same date demurrer was overruled, to which ruling... | |
| |