 | California. Supreme Court - Law reports, digests, etc - 1919 - 1004 pages
...Kingsbury, 554.) 2. OWNERSHIP NOT GRANTED TO UXITED STATES — RESERVED IN THE SEVERAL STATES. — The shores of navigable waters and the soils under them were not granted by the federal constitution to the United States, but were reserved to the states respectively. (Id.) 3. RIGHTS... | |
 | Economics - 1920 - 1006 pages
...thus summarized by the court itself:) "By the preceding course of reasoning we have arrived at these general conclusions : First, the shores of navigable...states respectively. Secondly, the new states have the same rights, sovereignty, and jurisdiction over this subject as the original states. Thirdly, the... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court - Law reports, digests, etc - 1922 - 1044 pages
...the soil under them. The shores of navigable waters and the soil under them were not granted by tbe Constitution to the United States, but were reserved to the states respectively. And new states have the same rights of sovereignty and jurisdiction over this subject as the original... | |
 | United States - 1922 - 740 pages
...fact that under judicial decisions navigable waters and the soils under them were not granted by die Constitution to the United States but were reserved to the States, respectively. (Pollard v. Hagan, 3 How., 212; Barney v. Keokuk, 94 US, 338; Scott v. Lattig, 227 US, 229.) Where... | |
 | United States. Board of Engineers for Rivers and Harbors - Harbors - 1923 - 256 pages
...affirming judgment against the plaintiffs the United States Supreme Court laid down these principles : First, the shores of navigable waters, and the soils...States respectively; secondly, the new States have the same rights, sovereignty, and Jurisdiction over this subject as the original States; thirdly, the... | |
 | United States. Board of Engineers for Rivers and Harbors - Harbors - 1923 - 258 pages
...affirming judgment against the plaintiffs the United States Supreme Court laid down these principles : First, the shores of navigable waters, and the soils...States respectively ; secondly, the new S-tates have the same rights, sovereignty, and jurisdiction over this subject as the original States; thirdly, the... | |
 | United States. Congress. Senate. Select committee on reforestation - Reforestation - 1923 - 1490 pages
...State or elsewhere except in the cases in which it is expressly granted." It was held in that case that the shores of navigable waters and the soils under them were not granted by the Constitution of the United States, but were reserved to the States, respectively, and that Alabama, though a new... | |
 | United States. Congress. Senate. Select Committee on Reforestation - Reforestation - 1923 - 1502 pages
...State or elsewhere except in the cases in which it is expressly granted." It was held in that case that the shores of navigable waters and the soils under them were not granted by the Constitution of the United States, but were reserved to (he States, respectively, and that Alabama, though a new... | |
| |
By the preceding course of reasoning we have arrived at these general conclusions. : First, the shores of navigable waters, and the soils under them, were not granted by the Constitution to the United States, but were reserved to the States respectively. 
