 | Abraham Clark Freeman - Law reports, digests, etc - 1898 - 1034 pages
...hold that, in the absence of congressional permission to do so, the state had no power to interfere, by seizure or any other action, in prohibition of...nonresident importer. Whatever our individual views may be aa to the deleterious or dangerous qualities of particular articles, we cannot hold that any articles... | |
 | Law reports, digests, etc - 1899 - 1210 pages
...In the first instance, to congressional regulation only. In the conclusion of the opinion, he said: "Whatever our individual views may be as to the deleterious...recognizes as subjects of interstate commerce are not such, or that whatever, are thus recognized can be controlled by state laws amounting to regulation,... | |
 | Tennessee. Supreme Court, William Wilcox Cooke, Joseph Brown Heiskell, Jere Baxter, Benjamin James Lea, George Wesley Pickle, Charles Theodore Cates, Frank Marian Thompson, Charles Le Sueur Cornelius, Roy Hood Beeler - Law reports, digests, etc - 1899 - 832 pages
...in the first instance, to congressional regulation only. In the conclusion of the opinion he said: " Whatever our individual views may be as to the deleterious...recognizes as subjects of interstate commerce are not such, or that whatever are thus recognized can be controlled by State laws amounting to regulation,... | |
 | New York (State). Supreme Court. Appellate Division - Law reports, digests, etc - 1899 - 746 pages
...hold that, in the absence of congressional permission to do so, the State had no power to interfere by seizure, or any other action, in prohibition of...and sale by the foreign or non-resident importer." (P. 124.) A large number of other cases might be cited in support of the proposition that where a State... | |
 | North Carolina Bar Association - Bar associations - 1905 - 272 pages
...hold that, in the absence, of congressional permission to do so, the State had no power to interfere by seizure, or any other action, in prohibition of importation and sale by the foreign non-resident importer." The clear inference from this decision and the preceding one in the Bowman... | |
 | Emlin McClain - Constitutional law - 1900 - 1134 pages
...hold that in the absence of congressional permission to do so, the State had no power to interfere by seizure, or any other action, in prohibition of...which Congress recognizes as subjects of interstate commfirce are not such, or that whatever are thus recognized can be controlled by State laws amounting... | |
 | Abraham Clark Freeman - Law reports, digests, etc - 1900 - 1044 pages
...in the first instance, to congressional regulation only. In the conclusion of the opinion he said: "Whatever our individual views may be as to the deleterious...recognizes as subjects of interstate commerce are not such, or that whatever are thus recognized can be controlled by state laws amounting to regulation,... | |
 | Emlin McClain - Constitutional law - 1900 - 1126 pages
...hold that in the absence of congressional permission to do so, the State had no power to interfere by seizure, or any other action, in prohibition of importation and sale by the foreign or non-,/ resident importer. Whatever our individual views may be as to the deleterious or dangerous qualities... | |
 | Sir John Quick - Constitutional history - 1901 - 1088 pages
...hold that in the absence of congressional permission to do so, the State hud no power to interfere by seizure, or any other action, in prohibition of...recognizes as subjects of interstate commerce are not such, or that whatever are thus recognized can be controlled by .State laws amounting to regulations,... | |
 | Sir John Quick, Sir Robert Garran, Australia - Australia - 1901 - 1056 pages
...hold that in the absence of congressional permission to <lo so, the State had no power to interfere by seizure, or any other action, in prohibition of...recognizes as subjects of interstate commerce are not such, or that whatever are thus recognized can be controlled by State laws amounting to regulations,... | |
| |
Up to that point of time, we hold that in the absence of Congressional permission to do so, the State had no power to interfere by seizure, or any other action, in prohibition of importation and sale by the foreign or non-resident importer. 
