 This power to regulate is not a power to destroy, and limitation is not the equivalent of confiscation. Under pretense of regulating fares and freights, the state cannot require a railroad corporation to carry persons or property without reward : neither...  Annual Report - Iowa State Commerce Commission - Page 32by Iowa State Commerce Commission - 1891Full view - About this book
 | American Bar Association - Bar associations - 1896 - 728 pages
...is protected, the concession in an opinion, still against the companies, was thrown out that " the power to regulate is not a power to destroy, and limitation is not the equivalent of confiscation. Under pretense of regulating fares and freight, the State cannot require a railroad corporation to... | |
 | Law reports, digests, etc - 1924 - 1010 pages
...As was stated in Interstate Com. Com. v. Cincinnati, 167 Ü. S. 479, 17 Sup. Ct. 896, 42 L. Ed. 243, "This power to regulate is not a power to destroy,...limitation is not the equivalent of confiscation." The depriving of the public as is done In this instance, of the right to traverse the city streets to their... | |
 | Bar Association of Arkansas - Bar associations - 1908 - 650 pages
...said it is not to be inferred that this power of limitation or regulation is itself without limit. This power to regulate is not a power to destroy;...limitation is not the equivalent of confiscation. Under pretence of regulating fares and freights the State cannot require a railroad company to carry... | |
 | North Carolina Bar Association - Bar associations - 1908 - 218 pages
...thoroughly well established that the power of the states to regulate and limit passenger and freight rates "is not a power to destroy, and limitation is not the equivalent of confiscation." In the case of Reagan versus Farmers' Loan & Trust Company, 154 US, 362, this doctrine was clearly... | |
 | Law - 1886 - 332 pages
...said it is not to be inferred that this power of limitation or regulation is itself without limit. This power to regulate is not a power to destroy,...limitation is not the equivalent of confiscation. Under pretense of regulating fares and freights the State can not require a railroad corporation to... | |
 | Iowa State Bar Association - Bar associations - 1901 - 938 pages
...418, and other cases) that the power of the legislature to fix rates was not without limit; that the power to regulate is not a power to destroy, and limitation is not the equivalent of confiscation, and that the question of the reasonableness of a rate is a question for judicial investigation requiring... | |
 | Myres S Mac Dougal, William Michael Reisman - Law - 1985 - 490 pages
...said, it is not to be inferred that this power of limitation or regulation is itself without limit. This power to regulate is not a power to destroy,...limitation is not the equivalent of confiscation. Under pretence of regulating fares and freights, the State cannot require a railroad corporation to... | |
 | John Rogers Commons - 434 pages
...now acceded, and Justice Blatchford, for the majority, wrote, "This power to regulate [police power] is not a power to destroy, and limitation is not the equivalent of confiscation." i456.l And confiscation, or the reasonableness of a rate, "is eminently a question for judicial investigation,... | |
 | Howard Gillman - Law - 1993 - 336 pages
...the grounds that they were oppressive, the Court granted relief. "The power to regulate is not the power to destroy, and limitation is not the equivalent of confiscation." The majority stressed that legislatures had the power to set rates and could do so through a commission,... | |
| |
