This power to regulate is not a power to destroy, and limitation is not the equivalent of confiscation. Under pretense of regulating fares and freights, the state cannot require a railroad corporation to carry persons or property without reward : neither... Annual Report - Iowa State Commerce Commission - Page 32by Iowa State Commerce Commission - 1891Full view - About this book
| Michigan. Supreme Court, Randolph Manning, George C. Gibbs, Thomas McIntyre Cooley, Elijah W. Meddaugh, William Jennison, Hovey K. Clarke, Hoyt Post, Henry Allen Chaney, William Dudley Fuller, John Adams Brooks, Marquis B. Eaton, Herschel Bouton Lazell, James M. Reasoner, Richard W. Cooper - Law reports, digests, etc - 1891 - 782 pages
...said, it is not to be inferred that this power of limitation or regulation is itself without limit. This power to regulate is not a power to destroy,...limitation is not the equivalent of confiscation. Under pretense of regulating fares and freights. the state cannot require a railroad corporation '... | |
| Law - 1890 - 548 pages
...said, it is not to be inferred that this power of limiiation or regulation is itself withont limit. This power to regulate is not a power to destroy,...limitation is not the equivalent of confiscation. Under pretense of regulating fares and freights, the State cannot require a railroad corporation to... | |
| Law reports, digests, etc - 1902 - 988 pages
...said it is not to be inferred that this power of limitation or regulation is itself without limit. y that there may not be other matters to be regarded...in estimating the value of the property. What the Under pretense of regulating fares and freights the state cannot require a railroad corporation to... | |
| Law reports, digests, etc - 1897 - 1036 pages
...that "it is not to be Inferred that this power of limitation or regulation is Itself without limit This power to regulate Is not a power to destroy, and limitation Is not the équivalent of confiscation. Under the pretense of regulating fares and freights, the state cannot... | |
| United States. Supreme Court - Law reports, digests, etc - 1897 - 790 pages
...that " it is not to be inferred that this power of limitation or regulation is itself without limit. This power to regulate is not a power to destroy ;...limitation is not the equivalent of confiscation. Under the pretence of regulating fares and freights, the State cannot require a railroad to carry persons... | |
| Chicago and Alton Railroad Company - Railroads - 1886 - 470 pages
...said, it must not be inferred that this power of "limitation or regulation is itself without limit. This power to regulate is "not a power to destroy,...limitation is not the equivalent of confisca"tion. Under pretense of regulating fares and freights, the State can not "require a railroad corporation... | |
| Victor Morawetz - Corporation law - 1886 - 642 pages
...said, it is not to be inferred that this power of limitation or regulation is itself without limit. This power to regulate is not a power to destroy,...limitation is not the equivalent of confiscation. 1 See the cases cited in the pre- Union Tel. Co. v. Axtell, 69 Ind. ceding section. 199; State v. Bell... | |
| John Norton Pomeroy - Political Science - 1886 - 800 pages
...said, it is not to be inferred that this power of limitation or regulation is itself without limit. This power to regulate is not a power to destroy,...limitation is not the equivalent of confiscation. Under pretence of regulating fares and freights, the state cannot require a railroad corporation to... | |
| Law reports, digests, etc - 1907 - 1210 pages
...said it is not to be inferred that this power of limitation or regulation is itself without limit. This power to regulate is not a power to destroy,...limitation is not the equivalent of confiscation. Under pretense of regulating fares and freights, the state cannot require a railroad corporation to... | |
| |