 This power to regulate is not a power to destroy, and limitation is not the equivalent of confiscation. Under pretense of regulating fares and freights, the state cannot require a railroad corporation to carry persons or property without reward : neither...  Annual Report - Iowa State Commerce Commission - Page 32by Iowa State Commerce Commission - 1891Full view - About this book
 | Henry Clifford Spurr, Ellsworth Nichols - Law reports, digests, etc - 1916 - 1310 pages
...has been taken without due process of law or contract rights have been violated unreasonably. But the power to regulate is not a power to destroy, and limitation is not the equivalent of confiscation. Stone v. Farmers Loan & T. Co. 116 US 307, 331, 29 L. ed. 636, 644, 6 Sup. Ct. Kep. 334, 388, 1191.... | |
 | Hannis Taylor - Administrative law - 1917 - 1038 pages
...the delegation of legislative power. In the Railroad Commission Cases, 116 US 307, the Court said : "This power to regulate is not a power to destroy,...limitation is not the equivalent of confiscation. Under pretense of regulating fares and freights, the state can not require a railroad corporation to... | |
 | New York (State). Public Service Commission. 2nd District - Public utilities - 1918 - 472 pages
...said, it is not to be inferred that this power of limitation or regulation is itself without limit; this power to regulate is not a power to destroy and...limitation is not the equivalent of confiscation. Under pretense of regulating fares and freight the State can not require a railroad corporation to... | |
 | New York (State) - Administrative courts - 1918 - 772 pages
...said, it is not to be inferred that this power of limitation or regulation is itself without limit; this power to regulate is not a power to destroy and...limitation is not the equivalent of confiscation. Under pretense of regulating fares and freight the State can not require a railroad corporation to... | |
 | Walter Malins Rose - Annotations and citations (Law) - 1918 - 1160 pages
...be inferred that this power of limitation or regulation (by a legislature) is itself without limit. This power to regulate is not a power to destroy,...limitation is not the equivalent of confiscation. Under pretense of regulating fares and freights, the State cannot require a railroad corporation to... | |
 | Indiana State Bar Association (1916- ). Meeting - Bar associations - 1919 - 352 pages
...said it is not to be inferred that this power of limitation or regulation is itself without limit. This power to regulate is not a power to destroy,...limitation is not the equivalent of confiscation. Under pretense of regulating fares and freights, the State cannot require a railroad corporation to... | |
 | Needham Calvin Collier - Public service commissions - 1918 - 722 pages
...that: "It is not to tie inferred that the power of limitation or regulation is itself without limit. This power to regulate is not a power to destroy,...limitation is not the equivalent of confiscation. Under the pretense of regulating fares and freights, the state cannot require a railroad corporation... | |
 | Public service commissions - 1918 - 1264 pages
...been said it is not to be inferred that the power of limitation or regulation is without limit. The power to regulate is not a power to destroy, and limitation is not the equivalent of confiscation. Under pretense of regulating fares and freights the statute cannot require a railroad corpcPUR1918B.... | |
 | Electronic journals - 1919 - 1030 pages
...do-nothing policy of the Granger decisions. There were some intermediate rumblings, like the intimation that "this power to regulate is not a power to destroy,...limitation is not the equivalent of confiscation;" M but it was not until 1889 that any regulatory act or system of a state affecting transportation lines... | |
 | United States. Interstate Commerce Commission, United States - Interstate commerce - 1930 - 940 pages
...regulation of transportation charges is itself without limit. The power to regulate a carrier's rates Is not a power to destroy, and limitation is not the equivalent of confiscation. — Chicago, M. & St. PR Co. v. State of Minnesota ex rel. Railroad & W. Cornrn., 234 US 418, 33 L.... | |
| |
