 This power to regulate is not a power to destroy, and limitation is not the equivalent of confiscation. Under pretense of regulating fares and freights, the state cannot require a railroad corporation to carry persons or property without reward : neither...  Annual Report - Iowa State Commerce Commission - Page 32by Iowa State Commerce Commission - 1891Full view - About this book
 | Robert Harvey Whitten - Public utilities - 1912 - 852 pages
...remarked: "It is not inferred that this power of limitation or regulation is itself without limit. This power to regulate is not a power to destroy,...limitation is not the equivalent of confiscation." In 1888, however, in Dow v. Beidelman,4 Justice Gray said: "The court has no means, if it would under... | |
 | United States - 1912 - 1060 pages
...and not a judicial question; but in the Railroad Commissio cases (116 US, 307) the court declared: This power to regulate is not a power to destroy, and limitation is not ti equivalent of confiscation. Under pretense of regulating fares and freidi' the state can not require... | |
 | Charles Franklin Dunbar, Frank William Taussig, Abbott Payson Usher, Alvin Harvey Hansen, William Leonard Crum, Edward Chamberlin, Arthur Eli Monroe - Economics - 1912 - 816 pages
...inference that the power of regulation was without limit. " The power to regulate," it was said, " is not a power to destroy, and limitation is not the equivalent of confiscation. Under pretense of regulating fares and freights, the State cannot require a railroad corporation to... | |
 | Charles Franklin Dunbar, Frank William Taussig, Abbott Payson Usher, Alvin Harvey Hansen, William Leonard Crum, Edward Chamberlin, Arthur Eli Monroe - Economics - 1912 - 956 pages
...inference that the power of regulation was without limit. " The power to regulate," it was said, " is not a power to destroy, and limitation is not the equivalent of confiscation. Under pretense of regulating fares and freights, the State cannot require a railroad corporation to... | |
 | Charles Franklin Dunbar, Frank William Taussig, Abbott Payson Usher, Alvin Harvey Hansen, William Leonard Crum, Edward Chamberlin, Arthur Eli Monroe - Economics - 1912 - 818 pages
...inference that the power of regulation was without limit. " The power to regulate," it was said, " is not a power to destroy, and limitation is not the equivalent of confiscation. Under pretense of regulating fares and freights, the State cannot require a railroad corporation to... | |
 | Hobart Amory Hare, Walter Chrystie - Therapeutics - 1912 - 724 pages
...to the fourteenth amendment of the Constitution of the United States. This power of the legislature to regulate is not a power to destroy, and limitation is not equivalent to confiscation and under pretense of regulation the state cannot require the railroad corporation... | |
 | Tracy Philpot - 1913 - 326 pages
...said, it is not to be inferred that this power of limitation or regulation is itself without limit. This power to regulate is not a power to destroy,...limitation is not the equivalent of confiscation." (347) §260 Must Not Be Wrongfully Administered. — "A valid law may be wrongfully administered by... | |
 | American School (Lansing, Ill.), Howard Strickland Abbott - Corporation law - 1913 - 496 pages
...said, it is not to be inferred that this power of limitation or regulation is itself without limit. This power to regulate is not a power to destroy,...limitation is not the equivalent of confiscation. Under pretense of regulating fares and freights, the State cannot require a railroad corporation to... | |
 | William Zebina Ripley - Railroads - 1913 - 886 pages
...an inference that the power of regulation was without limit. "The power to regulate," it was said, " is not a power to destroy, and limitation is not the equivalent of confiscation. Under pretense of regulating fares and freights, the State cannot require a railroad corporation to... | |
| |
