This power to regulate is not a power to destroy, and limitation is not the equivalent of confiscation. Under pretense of regulating fares and freights, the state cannot require a railroad corporation to carry persons or property without reward : neither... Annual Report - Iowa State Commerce Commission - Page 32by Iowa State Commerce Commission - 1891Full view - About this book
| Joseph Henry Beale, Bruce Wyman - Interstate commerce - 1906 - 1402 pages
...said it is not to be inferred that this power of limitation or regulation is itself without limit. This power to regulate is not a power to destroy,...limitation is not the equivalent of confiscation. Under pretense of regulating fares and freights, the State cannot require a railroad corporation to... | |
| Harrison Standish Smalley - Railroads - 1906 - 184 pages
...been said it is not to be inferred that this form of limitation or regulation is itself without limit. This power to regulate is not a power to destroy,...limitation is not the equivalent of confiscation. Under pretence of regulating fares and freight, the State cannot require a railroad corporation to... | |
| Frank Hendrick - Antitrust law - 1906 - 604 pages
...power." 3 "It is not to be inferred that this power of limitation or regulation is itself without limit. This power to regulate is not a power to destroy,...limitation is not the equivalent of confiscation. Under pretense of regulating fares and freights the State cannot require a railroad corporation to... | |
| California. Supreme Court - Law reports, digests, etc - 1906 - 786 pages
...through the agency of a commission to fix rates of fare and freight on railroads within the state, said: "This power to regulate is not a power to destroy,...limitation is not the equivalent of confiscation. Under pretense of regulating fares and freights, the state cannot require a railroad corporation to... | |
| Jurisprudence - 1906 - 326 pages
...the bill for an injunction, in commenting on the legislative power as recognized in Munn v. Illinois: 'This power to regulate is not a power to destroy,...limitation is not the equivalent of confiscation. Under pretence of regulating fares and freights, the State cannot require a railroad corporation to... | |
| United States. Department of Justice - Attorneys general's opinions - 1906 - 766 pages
...said: "It is not to be inferred that this power of limitation or regulation is itself without limit. This power to regulate is not a power to destroy,...limitation is not the equivalent of confiscation. Under pretense of regulating fares and freights, the State can not require a railroad corporation to... | |
| Electronic journals - 1906 - 682 pages
...the principle which has since become so important in the discussion of this whole subject : 2 "The power to regulate is not a power to destroy, and limitation is not the equivalent of confiscation. Under pretense of regulating fares and freights, the State cannot require a railroad corporation to... | |
| Leslie Jay Tompkins - Corporation law - 1908 - 1188 pages
...of tolls and charges, that limitations have been found, beyond which the police power cannor go. " This power to regulate is not a power to destroy,...limitation is not the equivalent of confiscation. Under pretense of regulating fares and freights, the state cannot require a railroad corporation to... | |
| |