 Suppose one believed that human sacrifices were a necessary part of religious worship, would it be seriously contended that the civil government under which he lived could not interfere to prevent a sacrifice? Or if a wife religiously believed it was...  Albany Law Journal - Page 2661890Full view - About this book
 | Lenny Flank - Religion - 2007 - 243 pages
...contended that the civil government under which he lived could not interfere to prevent a sacrifice? Or if a wife religiously believed it was her duty...organization of society under the exclusive dominion of the United States, it is provided that plural marriages shall not be allowed. Can a man excuse his practices... | |
 | Mortimer Sellers - Law - 2007 - 179 pages
...contended that the civil government under which he lived could not interfere to prevent a sacrifice? Or if a wife religiously believed it was her duty...to prevent her carrying her belief into practice? 10 See, eg, Smith v. Fair Empl. & Hous. Comm'n, 913 P.2d 909 (Cal. 1996) (holding that a landlord cannot... | |
 | Sarah Song - Political Science - 2007
...contended that the civil government under which he lived could not interfere to prevent a sacrifice? Or if a wife religiously believed it was her duty to burn herself upon the funeral pile [sic] of her dead husband, would it be beyond the power of the civil government to prevent her carrying... | |
 | W. Noel Keyes - Medical - 2007 - 1174 pages
...contended that the civil government under which he lived could not interfere to prevent a sacrifice? Or, if a wife religiously believed it was her duty to burn herself upon the funeral pyre of her dead husband [a former practice in India], would it be beyond the power of the civil government... | |
 | United States - 1890
...interfere to prevent a sacrifice? Or, if a wife religiously believed it was her dnty to burn herself npon the funeral pile of her dead husband, would it be...government to prevent her carrying her belief into practice t So here, as a law of the organization of society under the exclusive dominion of the United States,... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court - Law reports, digests, etc - 1901
...which he lived could not interfere to prevent a sac ritice? Or if a wife religiously believed it wa her duty to burn herself upon the funeral pile of her dead husband, would it be beyond th power of the civil government to prevent carrying her belief into practice? So here, as a law of... | |
 | Seventh-Day Adventists - 1912
...can not interfere with mere religious belief and opinions, they may interfere with practises. . . . So here, as a law of the organization of society under the exclusive dominion of LIBERTY the United States, it is provided that plural marriages shall not be allowed. Can a man excuse... | |
| |
