 Suppose one believed that human sacrifices were a necessary part of religious worship, would it be seriously contended that the civil government under which he lived could not interfere to prevent a sacrifice? Or if a wife religiously believed it was...  Albany Law Journal - Page 2661890Full view - About this book
 | Marvin E. Frankel - Law - 1994 - 131 pages
...contended that the civil government under which he lived could not interfere to prevent a sacrifice? Or if a wife religiously believed it was her duty...organization of society under the exclusive dominion of the United States, it is provided that plural marriages shall not be allowed. Can a man excuse his practices... | |
 | Darien Auburn McWhirter - Law - 1994 - 189 pages
...contended that the civil government under which he lived could not interfere to prevent a sacrifice? Or if a wife religiously believed it was her duty...organization of society under the exclusive dominion of the United States, it is provided that plural marriages shall not be allowed. Can a man excuse his practices... | |
 | Frankie Hutton, Barbara Straus Reed - Social Science - 1995 - 251 pages
...the civil government under which he lived could not interfere to prevent a sacrifice? Or if a wife believed it was her duty to burn herself upon the funeral pile [sic] of her dead husband, would it be beyond the power of the civil government to prevent her carrying... | |
 | Jill Norgren, Serena Nanda - Law - 1996 - 307 pages
...contended that the civil government under which he lived could not interfere to prevent a sacrifice? Or if a wife religiously believed it was her duty to burn herself upon the funeral pyre of her dead husband, would it be beyond the power of the civil government to prevent her carrying... | |
 | Carol J. Greenhouse, Roshanak Kheshti - Social Science - 1998 - 305 pages
...contended that the civil government under which he lived could not interfere to prevent a sacrifice? Or if a wife religiously believed it was her duty...beyond the power of the civil government to prevent her from carrying that belief into practice?" (98 US 166). Through these questions Waite again frames the... | |
 | John J. Patrick, John I. Patrick, Gerald P. Long - Law - 1999 - 335 pages
...contended that the civil government under which he lived could not interfere to prevent a sacrifice? Or if a wife religiously believed it was her duty...organization of society under the exclusive dominion of the United States, it is provided that plural marriages shall not be allowed. Can a man excuse his practices... | |
 | Christopher A. Anzalone - 2000
...would it be seriously contended that the civil government could not interfere to prevent a sacrifice? Or if a wife religiously believed it was her duty to burn herself upon the funeral pyre of a dead husband, would it be beyond the power of the civil government to prevent her carrying... | |
 | Gordon Morris Bakken - Law - 2000 - 560 pages
...but not opinion. The court continued by quoting from Reynolds v. US, 98 US 145, 25 L. Ed. 244 (1879): So here, as a law of the organization of society under the exclusive dominion of the United States, it is provided that plural marriages shall not be allowed. Can a man excuse his practices... | |
 | Jerry Menikoff - Law - 2002 - 512 pages
...lived could not interfere to prevent a sacrifice? Or if a wife religiously believed it was her dut)' to burn herself upon the funeral pile of her dead...organization of society under the exclusive dominion of the United States, it is provided that plural marriages shall not be allowed. Can a man excuse his practices... | |
 | Edwin Brown Firmage, Richard Collin Mangrum - Religion - 2001 - 430 pages
...contended that the civil government under which he lived could not interfere to prevent a sacrifice? Or if a wife religiously believed it was her duty...to prevent her carrying her belief into practice? (US 98:166) Because not all religious conduct could reasonably be exempted from civil control, Waite... | |
| |
