 | Kansas. Supreme Court, Elliot V. Banks, William Craw Webb, Asa Maxson Fitz Randolph, Gasper Christopher Clemens, Thomas Emmet Dewey, Llewellyn James Graham, Oscar Leopold Moore, Earl Hilton Hatcher, Howard Franklin McCue - Law reports, digests, etc - 1912 - 1046 pages
...arriving at a correct understanding of its meaning. The statute requires that the court shall upon request "state, in writing, the conclusions of fact found, separately from the conclusions of law." (Civ. Code, § 297.) But the formal separation of the conclusions of fact from those of law is not... | |
 | Law reports, digests, etc - 1922 - 1206 pages
...evidence, as section 1402 only makes it the duty of the trial court at the request of the parties to state in writing the Conclusions of fact found separately from the conclusions of law where questions of fact are tried by the court. 2. Wills c=400 — Appellate court could consider whether... | |
 | Kansas. Supreme Court, Elliot V. Banks, William Craw Webb, Asa Maxson Fitz Randolph, Gasper Christopher Clemens, Thomas Emmet Dewey, Llewellyn James Graham, Oscar Leopold Moore, Earl Hilton Hatcher, Howard Franklin McCue - Law reports, digests, etc - 1893 - 900 pages
...the authority of chapter 214, Laws of 1887. (Gen. Stat. of 1889, 111 552 1-5531.) The court stated in writing the conclusions of fact found separately from the conclusions of law. Among the conclusions of fact found were : "1. A short time prior to the 3d day of June, 1887, the... | |
| |
... or defendant, unless one of the parties request it, with the view of excepting to the decision of the court upon the questions of law involved in the trial ; in which case the court shall state in writing the conclusions of fact found, separately... 
