...of the United States or any law of Congress, or upon any regulation of an executive department, or e fair-way or mid-channel which lies on the starboard...This article is embodied in the US Code as sec. 310 to which claims the party would be entitled to redress against the United States, either In a court...

...the United States or any T of Congress, or upon any regulation of an Executive Department, or upon У contract, express or implied, with the Government of the United States, or for ;es, liquidated or unliquidated, in cases not sounding in tort, in respect to claims the party would...

...can have judgment for its collection. (US v. Burchard, 125 US, 176; McElrath t>. US, 102 US, 426.) United States, or for damages, liquidated or unliquidated, in cases not sounding in tort, in respect to which claims the party would he entitled to redress against the United States, either in a court...

...of all claims against the United States exceeding $1,000, founded on contracts, express or Implied, or for damages, liquidated or unliquidated, in cases not sounding In tort, if claimant's petition shows that the claim la not founded upon torts of officers of the <!overnment,...

...on any claim 'founded upon the Constitution of the United States or any law of Congress * * * [or] upon any contract, express or implied, with the Government of the United States * * *' And 'it is well settled by many decisions of which we need only cite the last (Yearsley v. WA...

...contract, within the meaning of the statute which confers jurisdiction upon the Court of Claims, of actions founded upon any contract, express or implied, with the Government of the United States." See also. .\ew York Central RK. Co. v. Li. S. (65 ft. Cl. 115, aff'd 279 US 73, 73 L. ed. 619.) 3....

...contract, within the meaning of the statute which confers jurisdiction upon the Court of Claims, of actions founded upon any contract, express or implied, with the Government of the United States." See also, Aeto York Central RR. Co. v. US (65 Ct. Cl. 115, aff'd 279 US 73. 73 L. ed. 619.) 3. The...

...contract, and are answerable for that in the Court of Claims, which has jurisdiction of "all claims founded upon any contract, express or implied, with the Government of the United States, which may be suggested to it by a petition filed therein." RS, sec. 10/59; 10 Stat. at L., 612, sec....

...except for pensions, or upon any regulation of an executive department, or upon any contract, expressed or implied, with the government of the United States,...in cases not sounding in tort, in respect of which cbims the party would be entitled to redress against the United States, either in a court of law, equity,...

...reorganizing the Court of Claims (12 Stat. at L. 767, chap. 92) that the court might determine all claims " founded upon . . . any contract express or implied with the government of the United States." unless there was an implied promise by the United States to pay to every owner or captured or abandoned...