... for the frauds, deceits, concealments, misrepresentations, torts, negligences, and other malfeasances, or misfeasances, and omissions of duty, of his agent in the course of his employment, although the principal did not authorize, or justify, or participate... American Law Reports Annotated - Page 6051926Full view - About this book
| Utah. Supreme Court, Albert Hagan, John Augustine Marshall, John Maxcy Zane, James A. Williams, Joseph M. Tanner, George L. Nye, John Walcott Thompson, August B. Edler, Alonzo Blair Irvine, Harmel L. Pratt, William S. Dalton, H. Arnold Rich - Law reports, digests, etc - 1894 - 588 pages
...deceits, concealments, misrepresentations, torts, negligences, and other malfeasances or misfeasances, and omissions of duty of his agent in the course of...indeed know of, such misconduct, or even if he forbade the acts or disapproved of them." The learned author, in the same section, states the reason upon which... | |
| Nathaniel Cleveland Moak - Law reports, digests, etc - 1877 - 1000 pages
...deceits, concealments, misrepresentations, torts, negligences, and other malfeasances or misfeasances, and omissions of duty of his agent in the course of...indeed know of such misconduct, or even if he forbade the acts, or disapproved of them." He then proceeds, in s. 456 : " But although the principal is thus... | |
| Law reports, digests, etc - 1878 - 680 pages
...deceits, concealmcnta, misrepresentations, torts, negligences, and other malfeasances or misfeasances and omissions of duty of his agent in the course of his employment. Story on Agency, § 452 ; Shearman & Kedfield on Negligence, § 05 ; Lane v. Sir Kobert Cotton, 12... | |
| Law - 1878 - 442 pages
...deceits, concealments, misrepresentations, torts, negligences, and other malfeasances or misfeasances and omissions of duty of his agent in the course of his employment. (Story on Agency, § 452.) The rule is founded on public policy and convenience, for in no other way... | |
| Nebraska. Supreme Court, David Allen Campbell, Guy Ashton Brown, Lorenzo Crounse, Walter Alber Leese, Lee Herdmen, Henry Clay Lindsay, Henry Paxon Stoddart - Law reports, digests, etc - 1879 - 658 pages
...the principal is held liable to third persons in a civil suit for the frauds, torts, negligence, &c., of his agent in the course of his employment, although the principal did not authorize or justify said acts. In all such cases the rule respondeat superior applies. The Atlantic £ Great Western RW... | |
| Illinois. Appellate Court, James Bolesworth Bradwell - Law reports, digests, etc - 1879 - 712 pages
...appellant, and cited Cutler v. Smith, 57 111. 252. The principal is liable for the torts of his agent done in the course of his employment, although the principal did not authorize them : Story on Agency, §452; Phil. & Read. R'y Co. v. Derby, 20 Curtis, 291 ; Rausden v. Boston &... | |
| George Washington Field - Ultra vires - 1881 - 620 pages
...deceits, concealments, misrepresentations, torts, negligences and other malfeasances and misfeasances of his agent in the course of his employment, although the principal did not authorize, justify or participate in, or indeed know of, such misconduct, or even if he forbade the acts, or disapproved-... | |
| Joseph Story, Charles Pelham Greenough - Agency (Law) - 1882 - 730 pages
...Mackay v. The Commermisrepresentations, torts, negligences, and other malfeasances, or misfeasances, and omissions of duty, of his agent, in the course...indeed, know of such misconduct, or even if he forbade the acts, or disapproved of them.1 In all such cases, the cial Bank, 30 LTN s. 180, in the Privy Council,... | |
| William Williamson Kerr - Fraud - 1883 - 640 pages
...when acttng for fraud of in the course of his employment, although the principal did not authorise or justify or participate in, or indeed know of such misconduct, or even if he forbade the acts or disapproved of them. But the principal is not liable for the torts, or negligence of his... | |
| Charles G. Fall - Employers' liability - 1883 - 200 pages
...the torts, negligences and other malfeasances, or misfeasances, and omissions of duty of his servant, in the course of his employment, although the principal did not authorize it, or justify or participate in, or, indeed, know of such misconduct, or even if he forbade the acts... | |
| |