Government hardly could go on if to some extent values incident to property could not be diminished without paying for every such change in the general law. Supreme Court Reporter - Page 159by United States. Supreme Court - 1924Full view - About this book
| Richard A. Epstein - Law - 1985 - 380 pages
...takings and regulation. The impulse behind this received wisdom stems from Holmes's observaton in Mahon: "Government hardly could go on if to some extent values...without paying for every such change in the general law."2 Holmes quickly carves out a broad area for legislative control, but he preserves the tension... | |
| United States. Federal Communications Commission - Telecommunication - 1998 - 856 pages
...US at 65; see also Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. Mahon, 260 US 393, 413 (1922) ("Government could hardly go on if to some extent values incident to property...without paying for every such change in the general law-">3764 Federal Communications Commission FCC 97-376 In addition, as the Supreme Court held, a "prediction... | |
| Timothy Beatley - Architecture - 1994 - 332 pages
...Holmes, writing the majority opinion, is clear that such a demarcation point can and will be reached: Government hardly could go on if to some extent values...be diminished without paying for every such change Ethics and Individual Liberties in the general law. As long recognized, some values are enjoyed under... | |
| William A. Fischel - Business & Economics - 1995 - 446 pages
...substitute uncompensated regulation for compensable eminent domain. To quote Holmes from Pennsylvania Coal: "As long recognized, some values are enjoyed under...or the contract and due process clauses are gone." Ernst Freund's (1904) classic distinction between the noncompensable harm-prevention of the police... | |
| |