 | United States. Congress. House. Committee on the District of Columbia - 1967 - 368 pages
...with a quotation from Law ton v. Stcclc, 152 US 133, 14 S.Ct. 499 (1894) which reads: " * * * [0° justify the state in thus interposing its authority...require such interference; and, second, that the means arc reasonably necessary for the accomplishment of the purpose, and not unduly oppressive upon individuals.... | |
 | United States. Congress. House. Committee on the District of Columbia - Optometrists - 1967 - 378 pages
...interposing its authority in behalf of the public, it must appear— Kirst, that the interests of thc public generally, as distinguished from those of a...require such interference; and, second. that the means arc reasonably necessary for thc accomplishment of thc purpose, and not unduly oppressive upon individuals.... | |
 | John E. Stephen, Lyman M. Tondel - Aeronautics, Commercial - 1967 - 214 pages
...standards of common 176/ sense. Finally, to justify the exercise of police power, "it must appear. . . that the means are reasonably necessary for the accomplishment of the purpose, and not unduly oppressive up177 / on individuals". This has been described as the "classic 178/ statement" of "the familiar standard... | |
 | Will A. Irwin, Richard A. Liroff - Fines (Penalties) - 1974 - 284 pages
...the rule in Lawton v. Steele. 152 US 133... (1894) is still valid today: "To justify the state in... interposing its authority in behalf of the public,...appear — First, that the interests of the public. ..require such interference; and, second, that the me ana are reasonably necessary for the accomplishment... | |
 | Philippines. Supreme Court - Law reports, digests, etc - 1926 - 1230 pages
...interests of the public require, but what measures are necessary for the protection of such interests. To justify the state in thus interposing its authority...purpose, and not unduly oppressive upon individuals. The legislature may not, under the guise of protecting the public interests, arbitrarily interfere with... | |
 | Philippines. Supreme Court - Law reports, digests, etc - 1912 - 792 pages
...MANILA. HANILA— Continued. 2. The police power of the state is properly exercised where it appears (1) that the interests of the public generally as distinguished...a particular class, require such interference, and (2) that the means are reasonably necessary for the accomplishment of the purpose and not unduly oppressive... | |
 | Building laws - 1980 - 96 pages
...court used a two pronged analysis test which it would have used in Kings berry, which was: 1. Whether the public generally, as distinguished from those of a particular class, require such provisions, and 119/ Supra. Note 90. 120/ Supra. Note 66. 121/ 248 F. Supp. at 768. 122/ 248 F. Supp.... | |
 | United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Energy and Natural Resources - Coal - 1982 - 1274 pages
...statement of the rule in Lawlor v. Steel, 152 US 133 (1894) is still valid: To justify the state in ... interposing its authority in behalf of the public,...must appear first, that the interests of the public require such interference; and second, the means are reasonably necessary For tinaccomplishment of... | |
 | Charles A. Lofgren - Law - 1988 - 282 pages
...such interests. [Emphasis added.] Two tests needed satisfying to justify exercise of the police power: "the interests of the public generally, as distinguished from those of a particular class, [had to] require such interference"; and the means had to be "reasonably necessary for the accomplishment... | |
| |
To justify the State in thus interposing its authority in behalf of the public, it must appear, first, that the interests of the public generally, as distinguished from those of a particular class, require such interference; and, second, that the means... 
