...631; Brten v. New York etc. RR Co., 109 NY 297. Or, as expressed in an English case, "where the thing is shown to be under the management of the defendant or his servants, and the accident is euch as, in the ordinary course of things, docs not happen if those who have the management use proper...

...1865 (/), in these terms: — " There must be reasonable evidence of negligence. " But where the thing is shown to be under the management of the defendant...reasonable evidence, in the absence of explanation by the defendants, that the accident arose from want of (e) Carpue v. London $ Brighton $ SCR Co. (1850) 5...

...reasonable evidence of negligence, but where the thing (meaning the thing which caused the injury) isshown to be under the management of the defendant or his...use proper care, it affords reasonable evidence, in the absense of explanation by the defendant, and that the accident arose from want of care." In the...

...Pollock On Torts, No. 363. " Thére must bo reasonable " evidence of negligence. But, whén the thing is shown " to be under the management of the defendant, or his ser" vants, and the accident is such as, in the ordinary course " of things, does not happen if those...

...that " where the thing" (goods suspended over the pavement, which fell and injured the plaintiff) " is shown to be under the management of the defendant...defendant, that the accident arose from want of care." In Moffatt v. Btifeman (e), it was held that the principle of Scoft v. London and 8f. Catherine's Dock...

...reasonable evidence of negligence, but where the thing (meaning the thing which causes the injury) is shown to be under the management of the defendant...defendant, that the accident arose from want of care." In the case at bar the thing which obstructed the passage in the car was evidently the personal baggage...

...doctrine was thus laid down: "There must « some reasonable evidence of negligence. But where the thing is shown to be under the management of the defendant...use proper care, it affords reasonable evidence, in the absence of explanation, that the accident arose from want of care." See also Priggs v. Oliver,...

...There *«iu3tbe reasonable evidence of negligence. •Bat, «hen the thing is shown to be under "lie management of the defendant or his "servants, and...use " proper care, it affords reasonable evidence, *m the absence of explanation by the de" tendant, that the accident arose from want •of care." On...

...negligence. But where the thing is shown to be under the management of the de16 C. of L. — 29 fendant or his servants, and the accident is such as in the...use proper care, it affords reasonable evidence, In the absence of explanation, that the accident arose from want of care." See also Priggs v. Oliver,...

...principle was thus formulated by Mr. Chief Justice ERLE in the following language: "Where the thing is shown to be under the management of the defendant or his servants, and the accident is such as, under an ordinary course of things, does not happen if those who have the management use proper care,...