 | Law reports, digests, etc - 1906 - 1036 pages
...relating to the misstatements concerning Lechner would be profitless. We may say here, however, that we find no error in the action of the trial court in refusing to direct a verdict for the defendant on this ground. In the certificates the date when the last examination of the books had been made is... | |
 | Law reports, digests, etc - 1911 - 1076 pages
...presented is that raised by the defendant's assignment of error based upon exception to the action of the trial court in refusing to direct a verdict for the defendant, first at the close of plaintiff's testimony, and then at the close of all the testimony. The law is... | |
 | Law - 1909 - 1304 pages
...action on the case for personal injuries ; and the only error assigned and insisted upon is the action of the trial court in refusing to direct a verdict for the defendant. Appellee's injuries were received about 7 o'clock In the evening of December 1, 1003, at the Intersection... | |
 | Bankruptcy - 1928 - 808 pages
...States (CC A., 8th Cir.), 15 F.(2d) 077. The other points raised by the defendant refer to the action of the trial court in refusing to direct a verdict for the defendant and in refusing a motion in arrest of judgment (assignment of errors 2 and 3). There was evidence to... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court - Law reports, digests, etc - 1896 - 1132 pages
...of the trial court in overruling a motion for a new trial. Neither will this court review the action of the trial court in refusing to direct a verdict for the defendant, if there be any evidence to support the plaintiff's claim. brand Trunk R. Co. v. Walker, 154 U. 8.... | |
 | Law reports, digests, etc - 1922 - 632 pages
...abundance of conflict in the testimony in this case as to whether or not the confession was voluntary, and we find no error in the action of the trial court in submitting that question of fact to the jury. Burdge v. State, 53 Ohio St., 512. We think these cases... | |
 | Law reports, digests, etc - 1925 - 1026 pages
...which was also refused. The first assignment of error challenges the correctness of the ruling of the court in refusing to direct a verdict for the defendant. It Is insisted by the appellant that It is not liable even though it was negligence on its part to leave... | |
 | Illinois. Appellate Court, Martin L. Newell, Mason Harder Newell, Walter Clyde Jones, Keene Harwood Addington, Basil Jones, James Max Henderson, Ray Smith - Law reports, digests, etc - 1920 - 806 pages
...case, supra, we think the contention of appellants cannot be sustained, and that not only was there no error in the action of the trial court in refusing to direct a verdict for defendant on the theory plaintiff was a trespasser, but also that the trial court properly refused... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court - Law reports, digests, etc - 1901 - 1346 pages
...of the trial court in overruling a motion for a new trial. Neither will this court review the action of the trial court in refusing to direct a verdict for the defendant, if there Ъе any evidence to support the plaintiff's claim. Urand Trunk R. Co. v. Walker, 154 U. 3.... | |
 | Illinois. Appellate Court, Martin L. Newell, Mason Harder Newell, Walter Clyde Jones, Keene Harwood Addington, James Christopher Cahill, Basil Jones, James Max Henderson, Ray Smith - Law reports, digests, etc - 1921 - 748 pages
...for the death of one killed by defendant's trains, the Appellate Court will not overrule the action of the trial court in refusing to direct a verdict for the defendant, notwithstanding there is no evidence in the record tending to show that deceased was not guilty of... | |
| |
... we find no error in the action of the trial court in refusing to direct a verdict for the defendant. 
