...Robinson v. McAfee Ettate, 375. CONSTITUTIONAL LAW. 1. The purpose of the constitutional provision that " no law shall embrace more than one object, which shall be expressed in its title " [sec. 20, Art. 4] was to prevent "the practice of bringing together mto one bill subjects diverse...

...intoxicating liquors is not in violation of the Constitution of 1850, art. 4, £ 20, providing that no law shall embrace more than one object which shall be expressed in its title, in that it provides a civil remedy for the violation of the statute. 2 Comp. Laws, §§ 6379-6446....

...etc." Conviction reversed. The facts are stated in the opinion. Spaulding & Barker, for respondent : "No law shall embrace more than one object, which shall be expressed in its title," Const. Art. 4, § 20, and this provision is mandatory : Cooley's Const. Lira. §§ 82, 150. The Legislature,...

...at the title. It is said the title is invalid because it violates the constitutional provision that "no law shall embrace more than one object, which shall be expressed in its title." Art. 5, § 21. The title reads as follows: "An* act to regulate and prohibit false, deceptive, fraudulent...

...the following reasons: 1. That it is contrary to article 4, § 20, of the Constitution, which says: " No law shall embrace more than one object, which shall be expressed in its title." 2. That it confers upon military officers the power of arbitrarily setting aside the authority of the...

...unconstitutional, in that it violates section 20 of article 4 of the Constitution, which provides that no law shall embrace more than one object, which shall be expressed in its title. It is established by our decisions that, if what is introduced by way of an amendment to an act might...

...four grounds, namely : First. That it is in conflict with the provision of the Constitution that " No law shall embrace more than one object, which shall be expressed in its title." Second. That it violates another provision of the Constitution, to wit : " No law shall be revised,...

...this amendment comes within the prohibition of section 20, art. 4, of the Constitution then in force. "No law shall embrace more than one object which shall be expressed in its title." The amendment is inconsistent with, and outside of the purpose indicated by, the title of the original...

...14. Legislative acts, ffieir title. — The provision of the constitution, (Sec. 20, Art. 4,) that "no law shall embrace more than one object, which shall be expressed in its titie," was designed to prevent, 1st, the joining in the same bill subjects diverse in their natures,...

...eligible to parole.' "These provisions are certainly in violation of article 4, § 20, providing : ' No law shall embrace more than one object, which shall be expressed in itp title ' and they also violate section 47 of the same article conferring power only upon the legislature...