...the fact that § 6010 speaks in terms of "rights" supports their view. Their reliance is misplaced. " 'In expounding a statute, we must not be guided by...of the whole law. and to its object and policy.'" Philbrook v. Glodgett, 421 US 707, 713 (1975), 1 Opinion of the Court quoting United States v. Heirs...

...used. But we are not always governed by the grammatical construction. In the language of Justice Taney: "In expounding a statute, we must not be guided by...sentence or member of a sentence, but look to the provision of the whole law, and its object and policy." United States т. Boisdore, 8 How. 122, 12...

...used. But we are not always governed by the grammatical construction. In the language of Justice Taney: '•In expounding a statute, we must not be guided by a single sentence or member of a setitenee,"but look to the provision of (lie whole la«', and its object and policy." United States...

...in expounding a statute, it must not be guided by a single sentence or part of a sentence, but must look to the provisions of the whole law and to its object and policy, and must not accept a construction that would produce incongruous results. Using this guide, the Court...

...As stated by the Supreme Court of the United States in USV The Heirs of Boisdore, 12 Law Ed., 1009 : In expounding a statute, we must not be guided by...provisions of the whole law, and to its object and policy. Also the same court in the case of John A. Perrine V. The Chesapeake and Delaware Canal Company, in...

...read in complete isolation from their context in the Act, such an interpretation is possible. However, "In expounding a statute, we must not be guided by...provisions of the whole law, and to its object and policy." United States v. Boisdore's Heirs, 8 How. 113, 122. See also, Peck v. Jenness, 7 How. 612, 622-623;...

...as employees entitled to the protection of the Act. Pp. 283-294. (a) In expounding a statute, courts must not be guided by a single sentence or member of a sentence, but must look to the provisions of the whole law, and to its object and policy. P. 288. (b) A construction...

...absurd result never contemplated by the Congress. As the Supreme Court has repeated several times: "In expounding a statute we must not be guided by...provisions of the whole law and to its object and policy." United States v. Boisdore's Heirs, 8 How. 113, 121, quoted in Mastro Plastics Corp. v. Labor Board,...

...the context of the whole Act, and that in fulfilling our responsibility in interpreting legislation, "we must not be guided by a single sentence or member of a sentence, but [should] look to the provisions of the whole law, and to its object and policy." * * * [Footnotes omitted.]7...

...Richards v. United States, 369 US 1, 11 (1962) and cases cited. In interpreting legislation, a court " 'must not be guided by a single sentence or member of a sentence, but [should] look to the provisions of the whole law, and to its object and policy.' " Ibid. Subdivision...