 'suits in equity shall not "be sustained in either of the courts of the United States, -in any case where a plain, adequate and complete remedy may be had at law," or the constitutional right of parties in actions at law to a trial by a jury.  The Federal Reporter - Page 6071904Full view - About this book
 | American Bar Association - Bar associations - 1912 - 1264 pages
...the recent Federal Judicial Code. The section declares: "Suits in equity shall not be sustained ... in any case where a plain, adequate and complete remedy may be had at law." The line of division deals with remedies only, not with subjectmatter, nor with the courts that administer... | |
 | United States. Congress. Senate. Select Committee on Government Organization - 1937 - 510 pages
...(36 Stat. 1163), which provided that [reading]— Suits in equity shall not be sustained in any court of the United States in any case where a plain, adequate, and complete remedy may be had at law. That a plain, adequate and complete remedy may be had in the Court of Claims in a suit against the... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court, Palmer Daniel Edmunds - Civil procedure - 1938 - 782 pages
...Author's comment. The Judicial Code provides that suits in equity shall not be sustained in any court of the United States in any case where a plain, adequate, and complete remedy may be had at law. USC Title 28, § 384. As already indicated in the note to the preceding rule, though the claim may... | |
 | United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on the Judiciary - 1938 - 58 pages
...modification applies is not clear. Section 384 states that suits in equity shall not be sustained in any court of the United States in any case where a plain, adequate, and complete remedy may be had at law. A careful study of the new rules shows that under them the court in law actions will have equitable... | |
 | United States - 1959 - 642 pages
...This jurisdiction, as provided in section 16 of the original Judiciary Act of 1789, is not exercised in any case where a "plain, adequate, and complete remedy may be had at law." At the time the Constitution was framed the distinction between law and equity as known in England... | |
 | United States. Office of Commissioner of Internal Revenue - Taxation - 1959 - 316 pages
...Congress of Mar. 3,1911, sec. 267) provides thatSuits in equity shall not be sustained in any court of the United States in any case where a plain, adequate, and complete remedy may be had at law. Such a remedy at law ia afforded the taxpayer for recovering a tax "in any manner wrongfully collected." Rev.... | |
| |
