The law magazine and review : for both branches of the legal profession at home and abroad |
From inside the book
Results 6-10 of 100
Page 41
In the first place , there was the question as to the effect of sect . 3 of the Foreign
Enlistment Act , 1870 , that “ this Act shall come into “ operation in the United
Kingdom immediately on the “ passing thereof , and shall be proclaimed in every
...
In the first place , there was the question as to the effect of sect . 3 of the Foreign
Enlistment Act , 1870 , that “ this Act shall come into “ operation in the United
Kingdom immediately on the “ passing thereof , and shall be proclaimed in every
...
Page 42
Lord Russell made some interesting remarks upon the nature of “ Protectorates , ”
and pointed out that “ the question is whether , by “ whatever name it is called ,
the Crown exercised and “ assumed by its representatives sovereign dominion ...
Lord Russell made some interesting remarks upon the nature of “ Protectorates , ”
and pointed out that “ the question is whether , by “ whatever name it is called ,
the Crown exercised and “ assumed by its representatives sovereign dominion ...
Page 46
In that case , it appeared that the directors had given notice of an extraordinary
general meeting to pass a special resolution , and the question arose , which had
to be decided by Mr . Justice Kekewich , was whether or not the resolution had ...
In that case , it appeared that the directors had given notice of an extraordinary
general meeting to pass a special resolution , and the question arose , which had
to be decided by Mr . Justice Kekewich , was whether or not the resolution had ...
Page 50
The question then arose as to the validity of the preference shares , and as to the
right of the preference shareholders to participate in the distribution . Following
the decision of Hutton v . Scarborough Cliff Hotel Co . ( 4 De Gex Jones and ...
The question then arose as to the validity of the preference shares , and as to the
right of the preference shareholders to participate in the distribution . Following
the decision of Hutton v . Scarborough Cliff Hotel Co . ( 4 De Gex Jones and ...
Page 64
The Jurisdiction in question is said to have been conferred , first by the C . L . P .
Act , 1854 , and next by the Judicature Act , 1873 . Prior to and apart from those
Statutes , it is abundantly clear that no such jurisdiction existed , either at
Common ...
The Jurisdiction in question is said to have been conferred , first by the C . L . P .
Act , 1854 , and next by the Judicature Act , 1873 . Prior to and apart from those
Statutes , it is abundantly clear that no such jurisdiction existed , either at
Common ...
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
action allowed appears application appointed attorney authority Bill called carried cause charge claim Committee Common Law consideration considered constitution contained contract Council counsel County course Court crime criminal deal decision defendant duty edition effect England English entitled evidence existing fact foreign give given Government granted hand held House important instance interest International issue Italy Judge judgment jurisdiction jury Justice King land liability libel Limited London Lord matter means meeting nature notice obtained opinion party passed person plaintiff practice present Price principles prisoners proceedings provisions punishment question Railway reason received reference refused regard relating respect rule sect seems shares Statute taken term trade trial trustees University Vict