The American Law Review, Volume 30Little, Brown, and Company, 1896 - Law |
From inside the book
Results 6-10 of 75
Page 134
... JURISDICTION OF CONSULAR COURTS : DOES NOT EXTEND TO ALLOWING A COUNTER - CLAIM.- The decision of the Judicial Committee of the English Privy Council , in the case of The Imperial Japanese Govern- ment v . Peninsular and Oriental Steam ...
... JURISDICTION OF CONSULAR COURTS : DOES NOT EXTEND TO ALLOWING A COUNTER - CLAIM.- The decision of the Judicial Committee of the English Privy Council , in the case of The Imperial Japanese Govern- ment v . Peninsular and Oriental Steam ...
Page 163
... jurisdiction without the leave of the court previously ob- tained , and declaring that the service of process on any station agent of the receiver within the territorial jurisdiction of the court issuing the process , should be ...
... jurisdiction without the leave of the court previously ob- tained , and declaring that the service of process on any station agent of the receiver within the territorial jurisdiction of the court issuing the process , should be ...
Page 165
... jurisdiction to interfere with its possession of the property , or control its administration of the fund ; but , in the case of long lines of railroad , the question of the legal liability of its receiver to the demands of the citizen ...
... jurisdiction to interfere with its possession of the property , or control its administration of the fund ; but , in the case of long lines of railroad , the question of the legal liability of its receiver to the demands of the citizen ...
Page 166
... jurisdiction of the court in which such receiver or manager was appointed , so far as the same shall be neces- sary to the ends of justice . " After a long struggle , the rule announced in Dow v . Memphis & Little Rock R. Co. , 2 and ...
... jurisdiction of the court in which such receiver or manager was appointed , so far as the same shall be neces- sary to the ends of justice . " After a long struggle , the rule announced in Dow v . Memphis & Little Rock R. Co. , 2 and ...
Page 167
... jurisdiction over the State courts , and cannot annul , vacate or modify their judgments . " 2 II . ONE HAVING A DEMAND AGAINST THE RECEIVER MAY FILE AN INTERVENING PETITION IN THE FORECLOSURE SUIT THE PROPER PRACTICE IN SUCH A CASE ...
... jurisdiction over the State courts , and cannot annul , vacate or modify their judgments . " 2 II . ONE HAVING A DEMAND AGAINST THE RECEIVER MAY FILE AN INTERVENING PETITION IN THE FORECLOSURE SUIT THE PROPER PRACTICE IN SUCH A CASE ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
action amendment appears applied appointed authority bill Central Pacific Railroad charter Chief Justice Circuit Court cited citizen civil claim common law constitution contract corporation Court of Appeals creditors criminal Dartmouth College debts decided decision declared defendant District doctrine domicile Durrant duty election enforce England English equity executive exercise fact favor Federal forgery Fourteenth Amendment fraud grant heir held House of Lords interest International Law Irving Browne Judge judgment judicial judiciary jurisdiction jury land lawyers legal tender legislative legislature liability Lord ment Missouri mortgage negligence nolle prosequi opinion parol evidence parties payment person plaintiff President principle provision purpose question railroad company railway reason receiver referred rendered rule S. W. Rep seal statute statute of frauds Supreme Court Texas tion trial United witness Wong Kim Ark writing York