The American Law Review, Volume 30Little, Brown, and Company, 1896 - Law |
From inside the book
Results 6-10 of 35
Page 326
... Texas were enjoined as unreason- able and unjust , but the power to establish rates was not denied . The holders of the shares and bonds of the company sought protection against legislative invasion and destruction of the values of ...
... Texas were enjoined as unreason- able and unjust , but the power to establish rates was not denied . The holders of the shares and bonds of the company sought protection against legislative invasion and destruction of the values of ...
Page 456
... Texas had rendered such an absurd opinion , or that the people of this State had ever elected a judge so ignorant as to indulge in such a statement . What the court did say I here insert : - " The foregoing contains a fair summary of ...
... Texas had rendered such an absurd opinion , or that the people of this State had ever elected a judge so ignorant as to indulge in such a statement . What the court did say I here insert : - " The foregoing contains a fair summary of ...
Page 526
... Texas Ry . , Chief Justice Fuller , while denying the intervenor in that case priority , summarizes the doctrine as developed by the previous decisions of the court : " The doctrine of Fosdick v . Schall , 2 is that a court of equity ...
... Texas Ry . , Chief Justice Fuller , while denying the intervenor in that case priority , summarizes the doctrine as developed by the previous decisions of the court : " The doctrine of Fosdick v . Schall , 2 is that a court of equity ...
Page 531
... Texas Ry . , where he adopted the doctrine of Fosdick v . Schall , that " If there has been no diversion there can be no restoration . " The Chief Justice , in fact then , although he makes no allusion to that opinion , indorses the ...
... Texas Ry . , where he adopted the doctrine of Fosdick v . Schall , that " If there has been no diversion there can be no restoration . " The Chief Justice , in fact then , although he makes no allusion to that opinion , indorses the ...
Page 588
Texas the question whether , in a proceeding by quo warranto to forfeit the franchise of a corporation , a receiver of the property appointed by a court of the United States is a necessary party , answered the question in the negative ...
Texas the question whether , in a proceeding by quo warranto to forfeit the franchise of a corporation , a receiver of the property appointed by a court of the United States is a necessary party , answered the question in the negative ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
action amendment appears applied appointed authority bill Central Pacific Railroad charter Chief Justice Circuit Court cited citizen civil claim common law constitution contract corporation Court of Appeals creditors criminal Dartmouth College debts decided decision declared defendant District doctrine domicile Durrant duty election enforce England English equity executive exercise fact favor Federal forgery Fourteenth Amendment fraud grant heir held House of Lords interest International Law Irving Browne Judge judgment judicial judiciary jurisdiction jury land lawyers legal tender legislative legislature liability Lord ment Missouri mortgage negligence nolle prosequi opinion parol evidence parties payment person plaintiff President principle provision purpose question railroad company railway reason receiver referred rendered rule S. W. Rep seal statute statute of frauds Supreme Court Texas tion trial United witness Wong Kim Ark writing York