The American Law Review, Volume 8Little, Brown, and Company, 1874 - Law |
From inside the book
Results 6-10 of 71
Page 103
held in a partnership . Held , that the burden of proof lay upon A. to show that said money did not fall to B. under the residuary clause , and that A. failed in such proof . - Martin v . Hobson , L. R. 8 Ch . 401 . - 6. A testator gave ...
held in a partnership . Held , that the burden of proof lay upon A. to show that said money did not fall to B. under the residuary clause , and that A. failed in such proof . - Martin v . Hobson , L. R. 8 Ch . 401 . - 6. A testator gave ...
Page 106
... Held , that the master was not liable for the collision ; where a statute inflicts a penalty for not doing an act ... held upon such trusts , to take effect only after the marriage of L. , as L. should by deed appoint , and until such ...
... Held , that the master was not liable for the collision ; where a statute inflicts a penalty for not doing an act ... held upon such trusts , to take effect only after the marriage of L. , as L. should by deed appoint , and until such ...
Page 109
... held , that said article was relevant ; motion dismissed . -The Antilope , L. R. 4 Ad . & Ec . 33 . See TENDER . SCANDAL . See BILL IN EQUITY . - - SEAMAN . - See LEGACY , 7 . SERVICE . See WRIT . - SETTLEMENT . 1. Upon marriage , a ...
... held , that said article was relevant ; motion dismissed . -The Antilope , L. R. 4 Ad . & Ec . 33 . See TENDER . SCANDAL . See BILL IN EQUITY . - - SEAMAN . - See LEGACY , 7 . SERVICE . See WRIT . - SETTLEMENT . 1. Upon marriage , a ...
Page 111
... Held , that said trustee had affirmed said sale by B. , and therefore could not bring trover against B. for the difference between the value of said goods and the amount of the proceeds of said sale . Smith v . Baker , L. R. 8 C. P. 350 ...
... Held , that said trustee had affirmed said sale by B. , and therefore could not bring trover against B. for the difference between the value of said goods and the amount of the proceeds of said sale . Smith v . Baker , L. R. 8 C. P. 350 ...
Page 112
... Held , that the purchaser was entitled to recover back his deposit , as no complete abstract of title had been delivered , and as said conditions did not apply to the case of the vendors being unable to give a title . Want v ...
... Held , that the purchaser was entitled to recover back his deposit , as no complete abstract of title had been delivered , and as said conditions did not apply to the case of the vendors being unable to give a title . Want v ...
Contents
381 | |
470 | |
508 | |
530 | |
554 | |
580 | |
604 | |
607 | |
156 | |
159 | |
182 | |
189 | |
240 | |
256 | |
285 | |
306 | |
326 | |
352 | |
354 | |
378 | |
631 | |
649 | |
661 | |
669 | |
691 | |
709 | |
730 | |
753 | |
770 | |
773 | |
793 | |
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
action agent American amount appear appointed authority bank bankrupt bankruptcy bill brought called cause charge Chief Justice claim common condition consideration considered CONSTITUTIONAL contained contract corporation court creditors damages death debt decided decision defendant direct doubt duty edition England English entitled equity evidence execution executor existence expressed fact fraud give given granted ground Held interest issue judges judgment jurisdiction jury Justice killing land liable limited Lord loss matter means mortgage nature negligence never notice opinion paid party passed payment person plaintiff practice present principle proceedings proved question railway reason received recover referred regard Reports respect rule sheep statute suit Supreme Court taken thing tion tort trial trust United vessel volume whole wife witness York