« PreviousContinue »
Detinue : (i.) C. A.-Chattels Found on Private Property-Right to Possession. The
presumption is that a chattel found upon private land is in the possession of the owner of the land and he is entitled against the finder.-The South Staffordshire Waterworks Company v. Sharman, L.R.
 2 Q.B. 41; 74 L.T. 761. Divorce :(ii.) P. D.-Practice—Co-respondent--Matrimonial Causes Act, 1857, ss.
28, 33.—Where a petitioner seeks relief on the ground of adultery committed with a man alive and known, he must make this person a
co-respondent.-Jones v. Jones, L.R.  P. 165 ; 75 L.T. 190. (iii.) P. D.-Restitution of Conjugal Rights—Matrimonial Causes Act, 1884,
s. 5.-A wife, whose husband refused to receive her because she had left her home through disagreement with his children by a former marriage, was held entitled to a decree for restitution of conjugal
rights.-Oldroyd v. Oldroyd, L.R.  P. 175. (iv.) P. D.-Practice-Sequestration—Money held by Persons not Party to
Action-Matrimonial Causes Act, 1857, s. 52.-Sequestrators cannot attach money alleged, but denied, to be held for the judgment debtor by persons who are not parties unless these submit to the jurisdiction
of the Court.-Craig v. Craig and Hamp, L.R.  P. 171. (v.) H. L.- Evidence of Deceased Witness--Judge's Notes.-A certified copy
of the Judge's notes of evidence of a witness who dies is not accepted as proof of that evidence on the second reading of a bill for divorce.
Griffin's Divorce Bill, L.R.  A.C. 133. (vi.) P. D.-Practice-Substituted Service-A fidavit.-An affidavit of peti.
tioner should be produced on an application for substituted service on
a co-respondent.-Williams v. Williams and Pocock, L.R. (1896] P. 153. (vii.) P. D.-Evidence—Decree in Previous Suit.—Where a wife petitioned
for dissolution of marriage on ground of adultery and desertion, and produced the decree in a suit in which her husband had been co-respondent, which stated that the respondent had been guilty of adultery with him, and that he had been condemned in costs, but did not state any finding of the jury that he had been guilty of adultery with the respondent, it was held that the decree was not sufficient evidence
against him.-Ruck v. Ruck, L.R.  P. 152. (viii.) P. D.- Variation of Settlements-Costs out of orpus. ---Where a peti
tioner had obtained a decree absolute for the dissolution of her marriage, the Court extinguished a life interest of the respondent in property which she had brought into settlement, and directed the trustees to raise and pay to her a certain sum out of the corpus to
cover costs.-Douglas v. Douglas, 74 L.T. 384. Donatio Mortis Causa : (ix.) Q. B. D.-Antecedent Delivery.---Where in contemplation of death a
person who died a few days afterwards gave an article absolutely to the custodian of it, it was held that the change so made in the character of possession was sufficient to constitute a donatio mortis causa.
Cain v. Moon, L.R. (1896] 2 Q.B. 283 ; 74 L.T. 728. Dower:(x.) Ch. D.--Widow's Charge under Intestates Estates Act, 1890, ss. 2, 4
Abatement and Dower.-A widow's dower out of realty of an intestate abates in respect of her charge of £500 under the Intestates Estates Act, 1890.-In re Charriere ; Duret v. Charriere, L.R. (1896] 1 Ch. 912 ; 74 L.T. 650.
Ecclesiastical Law :(i.) P.D.--Sequestration--Pankruptcy of Incumbent – Discharge-Relaxation
-Sequestration Act, 1871, ss. I to 4.-Although a bankrupt clergyman may have obtained his discharge, the ordinary cannot relax sequestration of the benefice if the bankrupt's debts remain unpaid.-In re
Lawrence, L.R. (1896] P. 244. Escheat:(ii.) C. D.-Intestates Estates Act, 1884, 88. 4, 7.-A testatrix devised a fee
simple to her executors with directions that it should be sold and that the purchase money should form part of her general personal estate upon which she charged certain legacies, but she made no disposition of the residue. No heir at law having come in, it was held, that sect. 4 of the Intestates Estates Act, 1884, applied, and the Crown was entitled by escheat.-In re Wood ; Attorney-General v. Anderson, L.R. (1896]
2 Ch. 596; 75 L.T. 28. Estate Duty : (iii.) Ch. D.-Estate Duty on Leaseholds Specifically Bequeathed—Finance
Act, 1894, s. 9 (1).—On leaseholds specifically bequeathed estate duty is payable out of general personal estate of testator.-In re Culverhouse;
Cook v. Culverhouse, 74 L.T. 347; L.R. (1896] 2 Ch. 251. Estate Pur Autre Vie :(iv.) H. L.-Wills Act, 1837, s. 6-Special Occupant. --An appellant con
veyed a life estate to the use of himself and the respondent or their heirs upon trusts with a declaration of trust by the respondent in favour of an infant of all the estate conveyed to her. The infant died in the lifetime of both the parties. Held, that as there was no “special occupant" named in the deed, the infant's estate passed to his personal representative and not to his heir.—Earl of Mount Cashel v. More
Smith, L.R. (1896] A.C. 158; 74 L.T. 321. Executor :(v.) Ch. D.- Retainer- Debt of Bankrupt Legatee.-- Where executors made
à payment to mortgagees on account of a suretyship of the testator for a mortgagor who became bankrupt, they were entitled to retain from a bequest of residue by the testator to the bankrupt, the amount of the payment with interest at 4 per cent.-In re Watson ; Turner v.
Watson, L.R.  1 Ch. 925; 74 L.T. 453. Fancy Bread:(vi.) Q. B. D.-Shape—3 Geo. IV., c. 106, s. 4–Bread Act, 1836, s. 4.-A
loaf which is the same in shape, size, and appearance as the ordinary half quarten is not fancy bread and must be sold by weight.-The V. V.
Bread Co. v. Stubbs, 74 L.T. 704. Fixtures :(vii.) C. D.-Executor and Heir— Tapestry.—Under a devise of the mansion
house, tapestry nailed to battens let into the plaster and nailed to
brickwork pass as fixtures.-Norton v. Dashwood, L.R.  2 Ch. 497. Franchise :(viii.) C. A.- Parliament-Claims made after Close of List–Parliamentary
Registration Act, 1843, s. 41-County Voters Registration Act, 1865, s. 15.
- Persons who, after a date at which a revising barrister has announced that the lists of parliamentary and municipal electors will be closed, for the first time advance a claim to be included in the lists, have no right to be heard. Rey. V. Soden, L.R.  1 Q.B. 634; 74 L.T. 520.
Friendly Society :(i.) C. A.-Infant Members—Instrument of Dissolution signed by Fathers
and Guardians-Friendly Societies Act, 1855, 88. 9, 13, 15, 21, 25, 27; 1875, 88. 6, 9, 13, 15, 21, 25.—A society, formed under the Act of 1855, composed of members under 18 years of age, and under the government of a committee of another lodge, was precluded from dissolving itself under sect. 13 of the Act, or sect. 25 of the Act of 1875, without the concurrence of that committee.-Rudd v. Jones, L.R.  2 Ch. 554; 74 L.T. 714
Gas Company :-
Gas Works Clauses Act, 1871, ss. 11, 39.-Decision of Court below (see
Gas Works :(iii.) Q. B. D.-Breach of Statutory Duty-Remedy-Gas Works Clauses
Act, 1871, ss. 11, 12, 36.—The remedy of a consumer who suffers damage from insufficient supply by a gas company which is subject to the Gas Works Clauses Act, 1871, is to proceed by penalties under sect. 36 of the Act, and not by action.- Clegg, Parkinson & Co. v. Earby Gas Co., L.R.  1 Q.B. 592.
Guarantee : (iv.) H. L.-Representations as to Credit-Writing-Fraud—Mercantile Law
Amendment (Scotland) Act, 1856, s. 6—Lord Tenterden's Act.-Sect. 6 of the Mercantile Law Amendment (Scotland) Act requires in terms similar to the same section of Lord Tenterden's Act that representations as to the dealings of a person made for the purpose of enabling him to obtain credit shall be in writing; and the fact that these representations are made fraudulently to enable the person making them to obtain a benefit does not take them out of the Act.—Clydesdale Bank, Limited v. Paton and Another, 74 L.T. 738.
Highway: (v.) H. L.-Footpaths at Sides of Main Roads in Urban Sanitary Districts
-Repair-Highways and Locomotives (Amendment) Act, 1878, s. 13– Local Government Act, 1888, s. 11.—County councils are liable under sect. 11 of Local Government Act for repair of footpaths at the sides of disturnpiked roads which fall within sect. 13 of Highways and Locomotives Act, 1878.—County Council of Derby v. Urban District Council of Matlock Baths and Scarthin Nick, L.R.  A.C. 315; 74 L.T. 595.
Husband and Wife : (vi.) P. D. – Desertion — Time for Proceedings – Summary Jurisdiction
(Married Wl'omen) Act, 1895, ss. 4, 11. -The desèrtion of a married woman by her husband is a continuing act and an application for an order can be made later than six months after the commencement of the
desertion.—Heard v. Heard, L.R.  P. 188. (vii.) P. D.-Persistent Cruelty-Summary Jurisdiction (Married Women) Act,
1895, s. 4--Retrospective Operation of Section.—Sect. 4 is retrospective and will regard acts of persistent cruelty committed earlier than 1st January, 1896.-Lane v. Lane, 74 L.T. 557.
(i.) P. D.-Summary Jurisdiction (Married Women) Act, 1895, s. 5, sub-s. (c)
- Provision for Wife-Her Costs.-Courts of summary jurisdiction must consider the means and the earning capabilities of the husband and of the wife before making an order. Where a wife has to defend on appeal an order which she has obtained, her costs will be allowed.
-Earnshaw v. Earnshaw, L.R. (1896] P. 160 ; 74 L.T. 560. (ii.) C. A.-Divorce--Maintenance-Alienation or Release-Divorce and
Matrimonial Causes Acts, 1857 (s. 32) and 1866, s. 1.—An allowance to a divorced wife under sect. 1 of the Divorce and Matrimonial Causes Act, 1886, is for her maintenance and cannot be assigned or released without the sanction of the Court. Payment will not be enforced of arrears left unclaimed for a long time.- Watkins v. Watkins, L.R. 
P. 222; 74 L.T. 636. (iii.) C. D.-Post-Nuptial Settlement with Covenant as to After-Acquired
Property-Operation of Fines and Recoveries Act and of Malins's ActDivorce-Resettlement by Divorce Court under Mistake-—20 & 21 Vict., c. 85, 8. 45; and 22 & 23 Vict., c. 61, s. 5.-A married woman in 1877 made a post-nuptial settlement in which her husband joined of personal property to which she was entitled under intestacies and under instruments of earlier date than Malins's Act. There was a covenant to settle after-acquired property and the instrument was acknowledged under the Fines and Recoveries Act. By the will of a person who died in 1890, she acquired real property. In May, 1893, she was divorced. Under the impression that the instrument was valid, the Divorce Court varied it by consent of parties. In a subsequent action by the settlor, Held, that the settlement was void as to property not reduced into possession at the date of the decree nisi, as she was not at the date of the instrument entitled to real property within the Fines and Recoveries Act nor to personal property within Malins's Act; that consequently the resettlement by the Divorce Court did not bind this property. That the Court having power to put her upon terms required an undertaking from her that any further applications should be dealt with as if they had been made prior to the resettlement.-Allcard v. Walker; in re Lucas Walker v.
Lupton, L.R. (1896] 2 Ch. 369 ; 74 L.T. 487. (iv.) P.D.-Persistent Cruelty-Wilful Neglect to Provide Maintenance-Time
for Proceeding-Summary Jurisdiction (Married Women) Act, 1895, ss. 4, 8; Summary Jurisdiction Act, 1848, s. 11.-Persistent cruelty by a husband towards, and neglect to provide maintenance for, his wife are not continuing offences. Complaint must be made within six
calendar months of the offence.-Ellis v. Ellis, L.R.  P. 251. Industrial and Provident Society :(v.) Q. B. D.- Intestate Member—Distribution of his Property-Industrial
and Provident Societies Acts (1876, s. 11, and 1893, s. 27).—The power given by sect. 27 of the Industrial and Provident Societies Act, 1893, to the committee of a society to distribute the property therein of an intestate member who has made no nomination of such property is completely discretionary.-Escritt v. Todmorden Co-operative Society,
L.R.  1 Q.B. 461 ; 74 L.T. 350. Improvements :(vi.) Ch. D.--Tenants in Common-MortgageSale- Allowance for Improve.
ments. When tenants in common in fee had effected improvements, one half of the present value of the improvements was allowed to them and the other half to the life tenant in distributing proceeds of sale by a mortgagee.-In re Cook's Mortgage ; Lawledge v. Tyndall, L.R.  1 Ch. 923.
Insurance :(i.) C. A.- Accident-Nervous Shock from Fright.-A railway signalman,
in the excitement of his efforts in the course of his duty to prevent an accident to a train, suffered a nervous shock which incapacitated him. He was insured by the railway company under a policy which declared that the insurance was absolute for all accidents occurring in the discharge of his duty. Held, that he had sustained an accident within the terms of the policy.--Pugh v. London, Brighton and South Coast
Railway, L.R.  2 Q.B. 248; 74 L.T. 724. (ii.) C. D.-Accident - Renewed Policy is New Contract. A renewal of a
policy of insurance for the term of a year against accident is a new contract, not a renewal of the original contract.-Stokell v. Heywood, 74 L.T. 781.
Landlord and Tenant:(iii.) C. A.-Lease-Covenant not to Assign without Licence-Licence With
held.---The plaintiff held the reversion of a lease which contained a covenant not to assign without a licence, which was “not to be unreasonably withheld,” and a proviso for re-entry on breach. He refused his licence, because he wished to acquire possession himself, although he had made no binding offer to purchase. Held, that the licence had been unreasonably withheld.-Bates Donaldson,
L.R. (189672 Q.B. 241 ; 74 L.T. 751. (iv.) C. A.– Farm Lease-Covenant to Consume Hay and Straw on Premises
- Penalty.- A covenant in a farm lease fixed a penalty of £3 per ton for all hay and straw sold off the premises during the last year of the tenancy. There was a difference in the manurial value of hay and of straw. Held, that the sum made payable was a penalty, and not liquidated damages.-Willson and Another V. Love and Others,
L.R.  1 Q.B. 626 ; 74 L.T. 580. (v.) Q. B. D.-Allotment ? ---Allotment and Cottage Gardens Compensation for
Crops Act, 1887, s. 4.-A small piece of land cultivated by a seedsman for trade purposes is not an allotment within sect. 4.-Cooper v. Pearse, L.R. (1896] 1 Q.B. 562; 74 L.T. 495.
ease :(vi.) C. D.-Possession Prior to Parol Agreement-Continuance-Part Per
formance--Statute of Frauds, ss. 1 and 4.-- The plaintiff went into possession of premises on a parol agreement for a lease for more than three years, which was subsequently varied as to rent. Held, that continuance of possession was a parol performance which took the case out of the Statute of Frauds and entitled the plaintiff to specific
performance.—Hodson v. Heuland, L.R.  2 Cħ. 428; 74 L.T. 811. (vii.) H. L.-Covenant to keep in Repair-Damages.-Decision of the C. A.
(see Vol. 21, p. 12, v.) affirmed. -Conquest v. Ebbetts, 75 L.T. 36.
Licensing: (viii.) Q. B. D. & C. A.-Licensing Acts--Refusal of Licence-Appeal
Non-Appearance of Objector- Costs.-A person who is successful in an objection before justices to the renewal of a licence may be liable to the costs of a successful appeal, though he does not appear.-Rey. v. The Justices of Kent and Others, L.R. (1896] 2 Q.B.; 74 L.T. 618 and 75 L.T. 11.