Page images
PDF
EPUB

Opinion Per Curiam.

dred days from the entrance thereof, to enable respondent to conform to its terms and provisions.

Judgment of ouster.

NICHOLS, C. J., WANAMAKER, Newman, Jones, MATTHIAS, JOHNSON and DONAHUE, JJ., concur.

REPORTER'S NOTE - In similar proceedings in quo warranto, instituted in the supreme court by Attorney General Turner against the companies hereinafter named, the journal entry appearing above was entered on the date above set forth.

For the sake of brevity, we insert only the case numbers, names of respondents and counsel appearing, but omit the repetition of all data which is common to each proceeding.

No. 15077. GENERAL ACCIDENT, FIRE & LIFE ASSURANCE CORP., LTD., OF PERTH, SCOTLAND. Mr. A. I. Vorys; Messrs. Gage, Day, Wilkin & Wachner and Messrs. Kornhauser & Morgan, for respondent.

No. 15078. LONDON GUARANTEE & ACCIDENT Co., LTD., OF LONDON, ENG. Mr. Judson Harmon and Mr. A. I. Vorys, for respondent.

No. 15079. THE TRAVELERS INSURANCE Co. of HARTFORD, CONN. Mr. Judson Harmon and Mr. A. I. Vorys, for respondent.

No. 15080. ROYAL INDEMNITY CO OF NEW YORK, N. Y. Mr. Judson Harmon; Mr. A. I. Vorys and Messrs. Kornhauser & Morgan, for respondent.

No. 15081.

Opinion Per Curiam.

AETNA LIFE INSURANCE CO. OF HARTFORD, CONN. Mr. Judson Harmon and Mr. A. I. Vorys, for respondent.

No. 15082. HARTFORD ACCIDENT & INDEMNITY CO. OF HARTFORD, CONN. Mr. Judson Harmon and Mr. A. I. Vorys, for respondent.

No. 15085. UNITED STATES CASUALTY CO. OF NEW YORK, N. Y. Mr. Judson Harmon and Mr. A. I. Vorys, for respondent.

No. 15086. THE CASUALTY CO. OF AMERICA, of New York, N. Y. Messrs. Ford, Snyder & Tilden; Mr. Judson Harmon and Mr. A. I. Vorys, for respondent.

No. 15087. FIDELITY & CASUALTY CO. OF NEW YORK, N. Y. Messrs. Howell, Roberts & Duncan, for respondent.

No. 15091. GLOBE INDEMNITY CO. OF NEW YORK. Mr. Judson Harmon and Mr. A. I. Vorys, for respondent.

No. 15095. MARYLAND CASUALTY CO. OF MARYLAND. Mr. A. I. Vorys and Mr. Wilbur E. Benoy, for respondent.

No. 15076. UNION CASUALTY CO. OF PHILADELPHIA, PA. No appearance of counsel for respondent. (Service of summons had, defendant being in default for answer or demurrer, the court found the allegations of the petition thereby to be confessed to be true, and rendered judgment as stated in the foregoing journal entry.-REPORTER.)

Opinion Per Curiam.

THE STATE, Ex rel. Turner, Atty. Gen., V. THE STANDARD ACCIDENT INSURANCE CO. OF

DETROIT, MICH.

Workmen's compensation act-Self-insurance — Application of benefits - Validity of Section 22 (103 O. L., 72) — Section 1465-69, General Code - State liability board of awards-Constitutional law.

(No. 15084 - Decided April 17, 1917.)

IN QUO WARRANTO.

Same counsel for relator.

Mr. Fred M. McSweeney, for respondent.

This cause came on to be heard by the court upon the petition, answer and demurrer to the answer, and was argued by counsel and submitted to the court; upon consideration whereof it is ordered and adjudged by the court that said demurrer be and the same hereby is overruled; and plaintiff not desiring to plead further it is hereby ordered and adjudged that the petition be dismissed at the costs of relator.

Demurrer overruled and petition dismissed.

NICHOLS, C. J., WANAMAKER, NEWMAN, JONES, MATTHIAS, JOHNSON and DONAHUE, JJ., concur.

REPORTER'S NOTE-The foregoing case involved the same questions as the case of The State, ex rel. Turner, Atty. Gen., v. The U. S. Fidelity & Guar

Opinion Per Curiam.

LEATHERMAN V. THE COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION OF ALLEN COUNTY ET AL.

Schools-County board of education

Establishment of districts

·Constitutional law.

(No. 15395 Decided April 17, 1917.)

ERROR to the Court of Appeals of Allen county.

Mr. W. B. Ritchie and Mr. T. R. Hamilton, for plaintiff in error.

Mr. O. O. Barr, prosecuting attorney, and Messrs. Welty & Downing, for defendants in

error.

Judgment affirmed on authority of Cline v. Martin et al., 94 Ohio St., 420.

Judgment affirmed.

NICHOLS, C. J., WANAMAKER, NEWMAN, JONES, MATTHIAS, JOHNSON and DONAHUE, JJ., concur.

THE CITY OF CINCINNATI ET AL. V. CORMANY

ET AL.

Dismissals - No final judgment in court of appeals.

(No. 15402-Decided April 17, 1917.)

ERROR to the Court of Appeals of Hamilton county.

Opinion Per Curiam.

Mr. Charles A. Groom, city solicitor, and Mr. Frank K. Bowman, assistant city solicitor, for plaintiffs in error.

Mr. Walter C. Muhlhauser and Mr. Edward A. Hafner, for defendants in error.

It appearing from the record that no final judgment has been entered in the court of appeals in either of the three consolidated cases out of which this proceeding in error arises, it is ordered by the court, sua sponte, that the former order of this court, directing the court of appeals of Hamilton county to certify its record, be, and the same is hereby, vacated, set aside and held for naught, and a rehearing of the motion upon which said order was made is granted, and the petition in error filed in pursuance of said order is dismissed.

And the court coming now to the consideration of said motion, the court finds that there is no final order or judgment entered in either of these consolidated causes in the court of appeals of Hamilton county, and the motion to order certification of the record has been prematurely filed, and the same is therefore dismissed without consideration on the merits and without prejudice, at the costs of plaintiffs in error.

Cause dismissed.

NICHOLS, C. J., WANAMAKER, NEWMAN, JONES, MATTHIAS, JOHNSON and DONAHUE, JJ., concur.

« PreviousContinue »