Page images
PDF
EPUB

Whether employees are required to be engaged on a permanent or temporary basis is generally a matter of administration. Of course, where the employment of personal services is subject to the civil service laws and regulations, as would appear to be the situation here (second paragraph of your letter, supra), appointment of temporary employees is subject to the approval of the Civil Service Commission.

Referring to the question set forth in the second paragraph of your letter, you are advised that the appropriation item "Clerks, division headquarters" is available for the employment and payment of compensation to temporary employees appointed with the approval of the Civil Service Commission, and as assumed by you in the last paragraph of your letter, the total number of both permanent and temporary employees on the roll in the pay status at any one time during the current fiscal year may not exceed 194. Compare 20 Comp. Gen. 935.

Regarding the second question presented, under the express terms of section 698 of title 39, U. S. Code, supra, $1,900 per annum is the minimum salary rate of a clerk at division headquarters of post office inspectors. There appears nothing in the statute which would require the conclusion that said rate is limited to employees engaged on a permanent basis. Section 699 of the same title of the Code authorizes the employment of substitutes to perform the work of a regular employee during his absence on furlough or leave of absence without pay at a rate not to exceed the grade of pay of the clerk absent without pay under such regulations as the Postmaster General may prescribe. Accordingly, you are advised that the salary rate of a temporary clerk at division headquarters of post office inspectors who is not employed to perform (as a substitute) the work of a regular permanent employee may not be less than $1,900 per annum.

(B-21980)

PERSONAL SERVICES PRIVATE CONTRACT V. GOVERNMENT PERSONNEL STATISTICAL, TABULATING, ETC., SERVICES

While commercial firms may, under the circumstances, be engaged by the War Department to perform certain statistical, tabulating, etc., work involving not only the furnishing of specially trained personnel, but also sufficient space, supplies, and complicated and special machinery, where the work is to be performed in Government space and there is involved exclusively or essentially the rendition of personal services, such as typing, sorting. filing, indexing, etc., not requiring specialized training, the work should be performed by Government personnel.

Comptroller General Warren to the Secretary of War, November 27, 1941:

I have your letter of November 21, 1941, as follows:

It is desired to present for your consideration the following three questions arising within this Department wherein the facts and circumstances appear to be similar to those considered in decisions of October 28, 1941 (B-21347) and October 31, 1941 (B-21497):

(a) In the Civilian Personnel Division, Office of the Secretary of War, it is necessary to code, sort, and edit approximately 25,000 Personnel Code Sheets against 7,500 fanfold change notices, punch and verify 25,000 Personnel Statistical Cards, reproduce thereon employee code numbers and mechanically interpret the cards. This work would require the services of about twenty-five experienced employees for two months and the rental of three punching machines, type 031, and three verifying machines, type 054. It is very important in connection with the mandatory provisions of the Ramspeck Act that the proposed work and services be completed not later than December 12, 1941. Space is not available for installation of the required machines or for additional personnel to operate them and perform related duties. Moreover, it is not believed it would be possible to secure experienced personnel, or to train inexperienced personnel, in time to complete the work by December 12. It has been learned that other Government agencies are not in position to perform the work and services, but that it can be completed commercially by that date. It is therefore desired to invite bids and enter into a contract for this work and services.

(b) In the Office of the Chief of Ordnance it is necessary in connection with the national defense program to do considerable posting from transfer posting master tapes which are prepared on International business machines, type 405, alphabetic accounting machines, to spare parts control cards. The day and night shifts of employees now operating the five transfer posting machines have been unable to keep the work current incident to the installation of a large number of additional cards in connection with new and enlarged activities. Even should space become available for the rental and installation of additional machines it would not be possible to secure experienced employees to operate them nor to train inexperienced employees in sufficient time to avoid serious delay. Other Government agencies which have been contacted are not in position to perform the necessary work and services. It is therefore desired to invite bids and enter into a contract for the posting of approximately 350,000 cards which will require the services of five operators and the use of five machines with necessary materials and supplies for approximately one month.

(c) In the office of the Quartermaster General, owing to a tremendous increase of civilian personnel engaged in Quartermaster Corps activities in the field there have accumulated a large number of field approved appointments which must be posted to appropriate records. It has been physically impossible to keep this work current for the reason that while the existing loose-leaf system could be used under normal conditions it is not adaptable for use under present emergency conditions. Consequently, posting is necessarily awkward and slow, and a visible index system must be installed in order to maintain the records with the present force of employees. It is not possible to provide additional personnel for this work owing to an acute shortage of space. It is also apparent that the installation of a visible index system will result in considerable savings over the present system.

It is impracticable to have the work done by employees of other Governmental agencies, as it is necessary to keep the records in the office for constant use and reference. Should inexperienced employees be added for night duty they would require constant supervision, which could only be provided by employees who are now on day duty and whose services could not be spared for supervisory night work.

It has been ascertained that it would be possible to have the work and services performed by a commercial concern which could furnish supervisors and employees experienced in the installation and operation of the system (including the copying of all necessary data on die-cut cards, such as name, title, rate, salary, date position was authorized, name of post, corps area, title of appropriation, verification of accuracy, transcription, sorting, filing in proper panels and indexing of files in proper sequence, in order that the records can be turned over complete and ready for operation).

It is therefore desired to invite bids and enter into a contract for this work and services, which it is estimated can be completed within forty working nights by a force of fifty employees working six hours per night, five nights a week. Your views are requested as to whether contracts may properly be made for the proposed work and services, payable from either the appropriation "Contingent expenses, War Department, 1942," or allotments from "Ordnance service and supplies, Army, 1942," or "Pay of the Army, 1942," made available for contingent expenses under authority contained in the Military Appropriation Act, 1942, approved June 30, 1941. Inasmuch as these matters are urgent, an early reply will be greatly appreciated.

[blocks in formation]

With respect to questions (a) and (b) thereof it appears that the work and services for which it is desired to contract with commercial concerns are not such as necessarily must be performed by Government personnel since there is involved not only the furnishing of personal services, which under the circumstances involves specially trained personnel, but also sufficient space, supplies, and complicated and special machinery necessary to the performance of the work. Accordingly, in view of the representations in your letter that equipment, space, and personnel are not available in your Department and cannot be made available in time to meet the need for performance of the work, and since it is stated that no other Government agencies are in a position to perform the work and services, this office will not be required to object to your contracting therefor, after advertising for competitive bids, as proposed.

With respect to question (a) it appears the cost of the work contemplated thereby properly may be paid from the appropriation "Contingent expenses, War Department, 1942" since said appropriation expressly is available for "other absolutely necessary expenses." The work contemplated by your question (b) appears properly chargeable to the appropriation "Ordnance service and supplies, Army, 1942" since said appropriation expressly is available for "services necessary" to the storage, issue, handling, etc., of ordnance material, and for "services" in connection with the general work of the Ordnance Department. However, the appropriation "Pay of the Army, 1942" does not appear to be available for paying the cost of the work contemplated by questions (a) and (b) nor does it appear that it may be made available therefor by virtue of the provision under the heading "Salaries, War Department" of the Military Appropriation Act, 1942, approved June 30, 1941, 55 Stat. 389, authorizing the Secretary of War to use "any appropriations available for the Military Establishment," etc. Such authority relates expressly and exclusively to salaries of "additional personnel at the seat of government and elsewhere" and to "printing and binding, communication service, and supplies." It cannot properly be construed to relate to work and services of the character here considered.

The facts and circumstances in connection with your question (c) differ materially from those involved with respect to questions (a) and (b). The proposition there discussed appears to involve essentially, and perhaps exclusively, the rendition of personal services such as should be performed by Government personnel, i. e., typing, sorting, filing, indexing, etc., and it does not appear that any considerable specialized training for that purpose is required. Consequently, no reason appears why the work should not be performed by personnel employed by the Government. While it is stated it is impossible to provide additional personnel for the purpose owing

to an acute shortage of space, it is stated, also, that the work cannot be done by other Government agencies because it is necessary to keep the records in the War Department. It would appear, therefore, that space is available and that under the proposed plan it is contemplated the private contractor which would be employed to do the work would be required to supply personnel and do the work in available space of the War Department. Appropriations of the War Department are made available for the purpose of employing personnel to perform such services and this office may not authorize the entering into of a contract with a private concern for the performance of such personal services.

The questions presented are answered accordingly.

(B-18257)

TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY-APPROPRIATIONS FOR EXPENSES AND OBLIGATIONS-METHOD OF MAKING AVAILABLE FOR EX

PENDITURE

The General Accounting Office is not authorized to issue a certificate of settlement as a basis for direct payment to the Tennessee Valley Authority of the moneys appropriated to pay the expenses and obligations of the Authority, or to approve the advancement of appropriated moneys for its use except to a disbursing officer on an accountable warrant.

Comptroller General Warren to the Chairman, Board of Directors, Tennessee Valley Authority, December 1, 1941:

Reference is made to my telegram of June 24, 1941, to you advising that your letter of June 16, 1941, to the Secretary of the Treasury, transmitted to this office by the Treasury Department, was received here June 23, that I was giving careful consideration to the questions involved and, with respect to the immediate need for funds stated in your telgram of June 23d-the day your letter was received from the Treasury Department-that pending action by the Congress on the matter which I presented to it June 2, 1941, I would continue to honor requisitions and countersign accountable warrants for the advance of appropriated funds to the account of your disbursing officer in accordance with the procedure which has been followed ever since the Tennessee Valley Authority began its operations about 8 years ago.

Your letter of June 16, 1941, to the Secretary of the Treasury, with the Commissioner of Accounts' indorsement thereon dated June 18, 1941, as transmitted to the Claims Division of this office, is as follows: JUNE 16, 1941.

THE SECRETARY OF THE TREASURY,

Department of the Treasury, Washington, D. C.

MY DEAR MR. SECRETARY: The Tennessee Valley Authority hereby requests a settlement warrant in the amount of $5,000,000, to be charged against TVA

1941 appropriation (Account 6410110) and credited to TVA general checking account (Account 95-211).

This request follows the opinion of the Attorney-General dated June 9, 1941, holding that the Authority "is not accountable to the General Accounting Office, and that appropriated funds may be made available to it by settlement warrant."

Respectfully,

TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY, (Signed) HARCOURT A. MORGAN, Chairman. TREASURY DEPARTMENT, June 18, 1941.

Respectfully referred to the General Accounting Office for examination and settlement; payable from the appropriation 6410110 "Tennessee Valley Authority Fund, 1941" (Act April 18, 1940, 54 Stat. 138). Warrant to issue for deposit to the general checking account of the Tennessee Valley Authority, symbol 95-211.

(Signed) E. F. BARTELT, Commissioner of Accounts.

The letter and endorsement, taken together, poses the question whether this office is authorized by law to issue a certificate of settlement directly in favor of the Tennessee Valley Authority stating and certifying that $5,000,000 is due from the United States to the Tennessee Valley Authority; that is, that the United States is indebted to the Tennessee Valley Authority in that amount, and that such amount is legally payable directly to the Tennessee Valley Authority from the cited appropriation "Tennessee Valley Authority Fund, 1941." This involves the following questions: Is there a creditor-debtor relationship between the United States and the Tennessee Valley Authority? Can the United States be regarded as the debtor of one of its own administrative agencies or establishments, and, if so, is an appropriation made to pay the expenses and obligations of such agency to be regarded as a debt due such agency in its own right? Can the Tennessee Valley Authority have a claim against the Government? Did the Congress intend that the amount of the cited appropriation should be paid over directly to the Tennessee Valley Authority or did it intend that it should be drawn against or advanced only to pay the expenses and obligations of the Authority?

In your letter to the Secretary of the Treasury, quoted, supra, you cite the opinion of the Attorney General given June 9, 1941, taking the view that the Authority "is not accountable to the General Accounting Office, and that appropriated funds may be made available to it by settlement warrant." Such opinion apparently resolved the doubts as to accountability in favor of expansion or extension of administrative powers as against the legislative power over the purse, and it was apparently assumed that if the Authority is exempt from accountability under the Budget and Accounting Act, then appropriations made for the payment of the Authority's expenses and obligations legally may be paid directly over to the Authority in its own name. But that does not necessarily follow.

« PreviousContinue »