Page images
PDF
EPUB

that the salt was obtained by pamping op brine-water from a depth of 150 Clifford, before Fry, J., on the 4th inst., the question was raised feet and more, and then evaporating the same. The brine-water was whether a claim by prescription to an unlimited right of common on formed by the percolation of rain-water through strata of rock salt, and it the waste of a manor, in respect of a copykold tenant of the mapor, could was proved that if it was not pomped up, it was drawn off to other distant be a valid claim. There did not appear to be any modern authority sbaste, or found its way to the sea, HALL, V.C., beld that the proposed on the point directly applicable. FRY, J., said that the only right lease, so far as it dealt with the brine, would not fall within the sub-section which could be claimed under section 1 of the Prescription Act was a of the statute, and gave an anonnditional sanction to it.-SOLICITORS, right which could lawfully exist at common law. The law on the subject was Cunliffe, Beaumont, f Davenport.

thus stated in Cruise's Digest (4th ed.), vol. 3, p. 67 :-" Common apparte

nant may be for cattle without nomber, or for a certain pomber only; and MARRIED WOMAN-RESTRAINT ON ANTICIPATION-POWER OF COURT TO

may be appartenant to a manor by prescription, or by grant, made sinoe BIND INTEREST—CONSENT OF MARRIED WOMAN-CONVEYANCING AND LAW

time of memory; and that as well for a certain nomber of cattle as withont OF PROPERTY Act, 1881, s. 39-SEPARATE USE-POWER OF APPOINTMENT

number; where it is without number, it is restrained to cattle levant aud PAYMENT OF DEBTS.-In a case of Hodges v. Hodges, before Fry, J., on the

couchant on the land to which it is annexed. Therefore, if a person olaims 3rd inst., a question arose as to the exercise of the power which is given to the

| common by prescription on the land of another, for all manner of comcourt by section 39 of the Conveyancing Act of 1881, to remove a restraint on

monable cattle as belonging to a tenant, this is a void prescription, because anticipation which is imposed on an estate limited to the separate estate of a

he does not say that it is for oattle levant and couchant on the land.” And married woman. Section 39 provides that, “Notwithstanding that a married

this statement was folly borne ont by what was said in Rolle's Abridgment, woman is restrained from antioipation, the court may, if it thinks fit, where it

p. 398.-SOLICITORS, Morley & Shireff; Woodbridge & Sons. appears to the court to be for her benefit, by judgment or order, with her con. sent, bind her interest in any property.The facts were these. A testator who died in 1843 bequeathed a legacy to trustees, on trust to pay the income to his daughter for her life, for ber separate use, without power of anticipation ;

BILL OF EXCHANGE_ALTERATION AFTER ACCEPTANCE-NEGLIGENCE OF

ACCEPTOR_RIGHTS OF INDORSEE-STAMPING AFTER ALTERATION.-In a caso and after her death to hold the legacy on certain trusts for the benefit of her children. And, in case she should die without leaving any child or children,

of Adelphi Banh v. Edwards, before Chitty, J., on the 4th iost., an im. then to hold the fund in trust for such persons and in such manner as the

portant question was raised as to whether the indorsee of a bill of exchange daughter, whether covert or sole, should by will appoint, and, in default of

could recover on the bill under the following circumstances :- The bill was appointment, in trust for the daughter absolutely.

drawn for £22 28., payable four months after date in London, but before the

The suit was instituted in the Court of Chancery, in 1845, to administer the testator's estate, and an

figures 22 and after the word London blanks were left which were filled in by administration decree was made in that year. The daughter's legacy was

the insertion of the figure 2 so as to make the bill to be for the sum of £222 25., invested and carried over to a separate account for herself and others in

and the words “Two hundred and” were also iöserted. The bill was imsuccession.

The In 1874 she married a Frenchman, who was a domiciled French

pressed with a stamp for 3s., capable of being used for a sum of £300. subject, and was residing in France. A contrat de marriage, according to

defendant pleaded as a defence that the bill was altered in a material part French law, was executed in France upon the marriage, but it did not affect in

after acceptance, and was, therefore, void ; to which the plaintiffs replied that any way the fund in court, and no other settlement affecting that fund was

the defendant had contributed by his negligence to the fraud, and, therefore, made. In 1882, there having been no issue of the marriage, and the wife being

was not entitled to raise the objection. Another defence was raised that the fifty-five years of age, an application, by summons in the suit, was made on

bill was void, as it was not stamped after the alteration. CAITTY, J., said bebalf of the wife by a next friend) and the husband, asking that, notwith.

that the alteration in a material part voided the bill unless the defendant had standing the restraint on anticipation imposed by the will, an order might be

precluded himself from raising the objection. He did not think the defendant, made, pursuant to section 39 of the Conveyancing Act, 1881, that a part of

who was a Welsh farmer, could claim any indulgence on that ground, and the fund in court should be sold, and the proceeds of sale paid to the wife on her

that the same rule must apply whether the defendant was a farmer or a separate receipt. The wife made an affidarit, in which she said that she had

director of the Bank of England. There had been no actual representation during several years past been contracting debts with tradespeople and others,

by the defendant, as the plaintiffs had not inquired of bim whether the bill in the neighbourhood where she lived in France, in excess of her means of

in its present form had been accepted by him, so that the only question was payment, and that she was then indebted to the extent of several hundreds of covered by that of the Société Générale V.

| whether he could impute negligence to him. He considered the case

The Metropolitan Bank pounds, and was being much harassed by her creditors, who, knowing that

(21 W. K. 335). The plaintiffs, no doubt, relied greatly upon the case of she was entitled to a large sum in the Court of Chancery in England, were causing her very great annoyance and trouble by their importunity. A letter

Young v. Grole (2 Bing. 453) and some more recent cases, but in Young v. was also in evidence, written by the wife to the solicitors who had issued

Grote the case was one of banker and customer, and the customer, by giving the summons, urging them in the strongest terms to obtain the money for

| a blank cheque which was subsequently filled in for a larger amount than he her. No one was served with the summons, and no one appeared in

had intended, had himself contributed to the fraud. Moreover, there the opposition to it. It was urged that it was clearly for the benefit of the wife

customer did not sue ou the cheque, but for the balance of his account. The that she should be freed from the annoyance caused to her by her creditors.

present case was also distinguishable from those where the acceptance bad FRY, J., said that under the circumstances he thought it would be for the

been in blank. Two Scotch cases had been relied upon, but he did not think benefit of the wife that the restraint on anticipation should be removed to the

they governed this case, and he thought the lors must remain where it had

fallen, that was, on the plaintiffs, who had trusted the drawers, and against extent asked by the present application, and he was prepared to exercise the power given to him by section 39 for that purpose. The next question was

whom they would bave their remedy over. The defence that the bill was whether, that restriction being removed, a part of the capital of the fund should

stamped before the alteration was, in his opinion, also a good one, and the be paid out to her. She had no child and was now past the age of child-bearing.

Stamp Act clearly required a bill of exchange to be stamped after any alteraAccording to the decision of Hall, V.C., in In re Harvey's Estate (28 W. R. 73,

tion which in effect made it a new bill. On the whole, therefore, there must L. R. 13 Ch. D. 216), if she should execute the power of appointment given to

be judgment for the defendant with costs. He would, bowever, allow a stay her by the will, her appointees would take subject to the payment of her debts

of execution pending an appeal, if an appeal were brought within fourteen days. contracted on the faith of her separate estate. And, if she did not exercise the

-SOLICITORS, Brock f Chapman ; Toulmin & Son; C. Richards & Son. power of appointment, it was equally clear that her executors would take the fund, subject to the payment of the same debts. Therefore, quacunque vid, the fund would, after her death, be subject to the payment of her debts. His

VENDOR AND PURCHASER-LOSS BY FIRE--PAYMENT BY INSURANCE COMJordabip therefore thought that the order asked for might be made. He had

PANY TO VENDOR-RIGHT TO OBTAIN REPAYMENT-CONTRACT OF INDEMNITY. felt some doubt whether be ought not to require the attendance of the married

-In a case of Castellain v. Preston, before Chitty, J., on the 4th inst., an woman to be separately examined as to her consent. But he understood that

important question was argued, whether an insurance company could in other branobes of the court this formal consent bad not been reqaired under

recover from a vendor of property certain policy-moneys in respect of a fire section 39, and, therefore, he would not require it in the present case. But at

on the property, after the contract for sale, where the whole purchase-money the same time he thought it was worthy of consideration whether upon an

bad been subsequently paid to the vendor. In the case of Rayner v. Preston, application of this kind a separate examination of the married woman should not be taken, for there was great danger that such applioations might be made

an action brought by the parohaser against the same defendant, claiming an without the knowledge of the married woman.-SOLICITORS, Harling, Son, f.

abatement out of the parobase-money in respeot of the policy-moneye, or a Elis.

direction that they might be applied in reinstating the property, Cotton and Brett, L.JJ., James, L.J., diss., beld (L. R. 8 Ch. D. 1) that the parobaser

was not entitled to either form of relief, and that the aotion must be disPRACTICE-MOTION TO VARY MINUTES-PRODUCTION OF COPY OF REGIS. missed. Cotton and Brett, L.JJ., however, suggested that the insurance TRAR'S NOTE.-In a case of Robinson V. The Local Board for Barton, before

company might be entitled to recover the amount paid from the vendor, and Fry, J., on the 3rd inst., a motion was made to vary the minutes of an order bence this action was subsequently brought by the insurance company for on a special case pronounced by his lordsbip on the 27th of February. FRY, the amount, and tbe case was tried at the last agsizes by Obitty, J. After J., granted the application. And he said that when such a notice is made the argument, opon further consideration, CHITTY, J., held that there was no solicitor of the moving party ought to make a previous application to the express authority upon the point, and therefore that it must be considered registrar who was in court at the time when the order was made, for a copy of upon principle. The question really was whether the principle of subroga. the note which he then entered in his book, and this copy ought to be produced tion applied, as in such cases as North British, gc., Company v, London, in court on the hearing of the motion. This would prevent the delay which Liver pool, and Globe Insurance Company (L. R. 5 Cb, D. 569) and Simpson v. would otherwise be caused by the judge having himself to apply to the regis. Thomson (L. R. 3 App. 279). In the present case, however, he was asked trar for his note.-SOLICITORS, Byrne & Lucas; Le Riche f. Son.

to go much beyond any previous decision, and he considered the contract of insurance here was one entirely collateral to the contraot of sale. The

result was that, in his opinion, the action failed, and that the same must be COMMON APPURTENANT - LIMITATION VALIDITY OF CUSTOM - dismissed, with costs. -SOLICITORS, Laces, Bird, Newton, & Richardson, PRESCRIPTION ACT (2 & 3 WILL. 4, c. 71), 6. 1.-In & OAE of Morley v. Liverpool ; Anthony de Imlach, Liverpool.

ago.

COMPANY-WINDING-UP PETITION-FORMAL AFFIDAVIT VERIFYING Peti. TION_EFFECT OF SUCH AFFIDAVIT DEALING WITH MEASURES OF INFORMA

SOCIETIES. TION AND BELIEF-RULE 4, GENERAL ORDERS, NOVEMBER, 1862.-In a case of In re New Callao Company, also before Chitty, J., on the 4th inst., on the opening of a winding-up petition the objection was taken that there was no

BARRISTERS' BENEVOLENT ASSOCIATION. sufficient evidence of the facts stated in the petition. The usual formal affi. darit veritying the petition had been filed under rule 4 of the General Orders

The annual meeting of this association was held in the Middle Temple-ball, under the Companies Act, 1862; but this affidavit also went into other matters,

on Friday, the 31st ult. Lord Justice Brett presided. aod stated the deponent's information and belief as to the allegations in the

Mr. MACRORY read the report, which stated that the growth of the demands petition. It was contended by the company who opposed the petition that

on the association was rapid, but no equivalent increase was found in its The affidavit could not be relied on, as the formal affidavit made prima

funds. During the past year the subscriptions received were £186 less than facie evidence by rale, as it went beyond such formal affidavit, and, so far as it

in the preceding twelve months, amounting only to £963. Applications for dealt with matters of information and belief, such statements were not evid

relief were numerous and urgent, but many most deserving cases wera necesence in reliance on Gilbert v. Endean (L. R. 9 Ch. D. 259). It was therefore

sarily refused assistance. The report referred with regret to the death of contended that there was no evidence in support of the petition. CHITTY, J.,

Sir John Karslake, one of the trustees, whose place was taken by Mr. Justice said he did not think the affidavit was less the formal affidavit meant by

Manisty. the rule because it dealt with other matters, and that even if the allegations

Lord Justice BRETT, in moving the adoption of the report, said that on as to ioformation and belief were not evidence, still the effect of that would

the Northern Circuit whenever a sum was wanted every member of the

circuit subscribed a guinea, those who supposed themselves in good business simply be to avoid that part of the affidavit, and not to affect the formal part verifying the petition. He, therefore, held there was sufficient prima facie

subscribed two guineas, and all Queen's Counsel gave three guinea. He

did not think it would be at all a bad plan if the Attorney and Solicitor evidence in support of the petition, and he accordingly gave the respondents leave to adduce evidence in answer, reserving the question of costs.-SOLI.

General, the heads of the bar, were to send round a circular to every member CITORS, Greenfield & Abbott ; Lewis Davis.

of the bar and ask him, in support of that society, to allow bis name to be put down for at least a guinea.

Mr. S. PRENTICE, Q.C., treasurer of the Middle Temple, seconded the resolu.

tion. SOLICITORS' CASES.

The RECORDER of London and Mr. Justice MATHEW moved and seconded a

resolution appointing Mr. Justice Manisty one of the trustees. HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE.-QUEEN's Bench Division.

Lord COLERIDGE, in moving the election of the committee of management, (Sittings in Banc, before Grove, J., and HUDDLESTON, B.).

said he always thought the Barristers' Benevolent Institution the most March 30.-In the Matter of E. D. Lewis, a Solicitor.

valuable institution in connection with the profession, and he regretted that Candy moved, pursuant to notice, that an attachment should issue against

it did not receive a larger amount of support. Of course, no man would feel the defendant for a contempt of court in disobeying an order made a few days

that all bis charity was done when he subscribed to an institution of that

kind. He could not for one instant believe that the sources of bis generosity Murphy, Q.C., appeared for the defendant to oppose the motion.

dried up because he supported a society which did that for him which he could The order in question was to deliver up to the present solicitors of Mr.

not do personally ; but there were numbers and numbers of persons to whom Maitland certain papers and documents in possession of the defendant, who,

a little help from time to time, such as this society could give, was a matter up to February 28, had acted as solicitor to Mr. Maitland, and who will

of paramount necessity. The Lord Chief Justice then referred, with much shortly be tried for perjary at the Old Bailey. On the above date the court,

| feeling, to the death of Sir Joha Karslake, to whose great qualities he had acting on a report of Master Mellor, had held that Mr. Lewis discharged him.

tried to bear public witness as he could to the virtues of one wbo for self, as be said he would not go on acting, or tantamount to it, unless Mr.

many years had been his greatest opponent and his greatest friend. He was Maitland brought him £30 more than the fifty guineas already paid him by

one of the most genial, high-minded, and generous men. Mrs. Heath, who entered into a contract in writing with the defendant for

The meeting was also addressed by the Attorney-General (Sir H. James, him to defend Maitland at the police court.

Q.C.), the Solicitor-General (Sir F. Herschell, Q.C.), Vice-Chancellor Hall, Candy said the only documents banded over to the present solicitor of Mr.

Mr. Baron Huddleston, Mr. Murphy, Q.C., Mr. Baron Pollock, Mr. R. E.

Turner, and Mr. Justice Manisty, who said that out of 7,000 gentlemen who were Maitland were some newspapers, programmes, letters, and play-bills, which had no bearing on the criminal charge whatever.

really or nominally members of the profession, only 633 subscribed to the Murphy said Lis olient claimed to retain the brief he had drawn up for

society.
Counsel, copies of depositions, for which he had paid £1 78. 6d., and official
copies of documents. These, he contended, were not “ belonging " to the
oliert, but were the fruit of his own outlay and industry, Mr. Maitland
bad, in fact, paid nothing, and Mrs. Heath did not complain of the scale
of the defendant's chargeg. The order had been virtually complied with,
and there had been no wilful disobedience on the part of Mr. Lewis.

LAW STUDENTS' DEBATING SOCIETY.
GROVE, J., thought the rule should be made absolute for an attachment.
The court had not looked at the form of the rule, and that, perhaps, might |

Taesday, March 28.-Mr. O. E. Barry in the chair.-Messrs. W. E. Johnhave been made more specific ; but enough had been said to show that it son and H. J. Randolph Hemming were elected members of the society. bad been evaded. It was idle to suppose the order merely applied to the

Mr. Prankerd opened the question, “Should the Church of England be irrelevant matter handed to the client. In his judgment, Mr. Lewis had

digestablished and disendowed ?" in the affirmative. After a very ani been apply and more than amply remunerated, and he was not pushed by

mated debate, extending over three hours, in the course of whioh Messrs. his client into any straits or impoverished condition. He thonght the

T. P. Rhye, T. B. Napier, and W. A. Bisney supported the opener, and doonments did belong to Maitland, though with a lion on them for the

Messrs. Fargas, Price, W. Austin, Strickland, J. Van Sommer, Hiok, and R. solicitor's coats ; at all events, within the meaning of the order, whioh was

B. Pope the negative, a division was taken, which resulted in the question that they were to be returned andefaced in twelve days after the trial to being negatived by a majority of one vote. The number present was thirtythe defendant. To allow saob a compliance would be atterly to frustrate and disobey the order of the court. Mr, Maitland's whole defence at the Old Bailey might be out short and destroyed for want of these papers. He (the learned judge) felt convinced that the defendant know perfectly well that be

UNITED LAW STUDENTS' SOCIETY. was evading the order of tbe court when he handed the useless papers over.

At a meeting held at Clement's-inn-ball, on Wednesday, Maroh 22, Mr. HUDDLESTON, B., thought a grogs and scandalous contempt had been | B. T. Bartram in the chair, Mr. Mott Whitehouse moved, “That the laws committed by the defendant, who must have known the intention of the

of England ought to be codified." The opener was supported by ooart, and have set himself deliberately to evade that authority which Messrs. Tillotson, Spence, Symes, and Blackwell, and opposed by Messrs. they were bound to vindicate.

Clarkson and Jenke. Mr. Mott Whitehouse having raplied, the motion was Rule absolate, with costs.—Times.

pat to the meeting, and carried by a majority of nine votes.

LAW STUDENTS JOURNAL.

geven.

BIRMINGHAM LAW STUDENTS' SOCIETY,

A meeting of this society was held on the 14th ult., Alfred Canning, Esq., On Tuesday last leave to appeal in the case of Copp v. Lynch and the Law

aw

in

in the chair. Several new honorary wad ordinary members were elected, and Life Assurance Company was again refused by Mathew and Caye, JJ.,

other business transacted, after which a debate took place on the subject : Mathew, J., remarking that "the only effect of the decision was that solicitors,

“ Are the legal difficulties whica have been suggested as attendant upon the if they received commission in such cases, must let their clients know that

construction of the proposed Channel Tunnel worthy of serious consideration ?" they received it ; so that it should be received openly and above board.' That

The speakers on the affirmative were, Messrs. Streetly, Platnauer, Steere, was all, and how was that of importance ?".

Jeffreys, G. T. Edwards, and E. C. Rogers; and on the negative, Messrs. Mr. Justice Hawkins bas fixed the following dates for holding the ensuing T. A. Jenkyn Brown, Barrows, Whitaker, and Ryland. The debate, which Spring Assizes on the Western Circuit-piz., for the county of Somerset and was an interesting one, was carried in the negative by a majority of one. the county of the city of Bristol, at Taunton, Tuesday, April 18; for the There was a large attendance of members and a few visitors. counties of Devon and Cornwall, at Exeter, Monday, April 24; and for the The 702nd ordinary meeting of this society was held on Tuesday, the counties of Southampton, Wilts, and Dorset, at Winchester, Tuesday, May 16. 28th of March, A. G. Boller, Esq., in the chair. The subject for debate Mr. Baron Huddleston has fixed the following dates for holding the Spring was, “Is Hobbs v. The London and South-Western Railway Company, viewed Assizes on the Oxford Circuit :-Reading, Tuesday, April 18; Worcester, in the light of recent decisions, & safe guide as to the law on remoteness of Saturday, April 22 ; Stafford, Friday, April 28.

damage?” The chief recent decision referred to was that of McMahon v. Field (L. R. 7 Q. B. D. 591), decided last year. The speakers on the affirmative were Messrs. Ryland, W. Thompson, Stevens, and Coley; and

LEGAL APPOINTMENTS. on the negative, Messrs. G. T. Edwards, Atkins, and Coohrane. The debate was decided in favour of the affirmative by the casting vote of the obairman.

Mr. CHARLES DYKE ACLAND, barrister, who has been elected M.P. for the Eastern Division of the County of Cornwall in the Liberal interest, is the

eldest son of Sir Thomas Dyke Acland, Bart. He was born in 1842, and was MANCHESTER LAW STUDENTS' SOCIETY.

educated at Christ Church, Oxford. He was called to the bar at the Inner The eleventh meeting of the session of this society was held on Taesday Temple in Michaelmas Term, 1869, and he is a member of the Western evening, March 28, at the Law Library, Cross-street, the chair being taken

Circuit. by Mr. J. W. ilamilton, LL.B., barrister-at-law. The question for disous- Mr. Thomas PENNY, solicitor (of the firm of Bullock & Penny), of Berk. sion was as follows:-“Is Hobbs 9. London and South-Western Railway hampstead, has been appointed a Commissioner to administer Oaths in the Company, viewed in the light of recent decisions, a safe guide as to the law Supreme Court of Judicature. on remoteness of damage?Hobbs v. London and South-Western Railway Company (L. R. 10 Q. B. D. 111), Lilley v. Doubleday (L. R. 7 Q. B. 510),

Mr. Augustus HENRY MAULE, solicitor, of Newnbam and Lydney, has McMahon y Field (L. R. 7 Q. B. 591). The affirmative was opened by Mr.

| been appointed a Commissioner to administer Oaths in the Supreme Court of Solly, and he was supported by Messrs. Gibb, Higham, Brooks, Coward,

Judicature. and Hawking. For the negative there spoko Messrs. Branthwaite, Fox, The Hon. WILLIAM MACNaGUTEN ERSKINE, barrister, has succeeded to Rayner, and Carr. The chairman summed op the arguments, and on the the Peerage on the death of bis father, the fourth Lord Erskine. The new voting being taken the question was decided in the affirmative by a majority peer was born in 1841. He was for several years a captain in the 9th Lancers, of one. Mombers present, 28.

and he was called to the bar at Lincoln's-ina in Trinity Term, 1873. He has practised in the Chancery Division.

Mr. WILLIAM JESSE FREER, solicitor (of the firm of Freer, Reeve, Blunt,

& Rowlatt), of Leicester, has been appointed by the high sheriff of Leicester. OBITUARY.

shire (M:. William Winterton) to be Under-Sheriff of that county for the

current year. Mr. Freer was admitted a solicitor in 1875. MR. THOMAS WOODCOCK.

Mr. EDWARD CRESSWELL Peele, solicitor, of Shrewsbury, has been Mr. Thomas Woodcock, solicitor, of Haslingden and Ramsbottom, died on

appointed by the high sheriff of Shropshire (Mr. James Jenkinson) to be the 9th ult. Mr. Woodcock was born in 1810. He was admitted a sclicitor

Under-Sheriff of that county for the corrent year, Mr. Peele is town clerk in 1833, and he had practised for many years at Haslingden. He was

of the borough of Shrewsbury, and clerk to the county magistrates. He was associated in partnership with his sons, Mr. John Woodcock, who was

| admitted a solicitor in 1868. admitted in 1863, and Mr. Thomas Woodcock, junior, who was admitted in Mr. RICHARD HUGHES PRITCHARD, solicitor (of the firm of Hughes & 1865. He was a perpetual commissioner for Lancashire, and he had a very Pritchard), of Bangor, has been appointed by the high sheriff of Carnarvonextensive private practice. He was registrar of the Haslingden County Court sbire (Mr. Joseph Evans) to be Under-Sheriff of that county for the current (Circuit No. 4), and was formerly clerk to the county magistrates, in which year, Mr. Pritchard was admitted a solicitor in 1875. position he had been succeeded by his eldest son.

Mr. THOMAS DEWHURST LINGARD, solicitor, of Manchester, has been

appointed by the high sheriff of Rutlandshire (Mr. John William Davenport MR. EDWARD AUGUSTUS HILDER.

Hindley), to be Under-Sheriff of that county for the current year. Mr.

Lingard was admitted a solioitor in 1870. Mr. Edward Augustus Hilder, solicitor, of Gravesend, died on the 21st ult., in his seventy-first year. Jr. Hilder was born in 1811. He was admitted a

Mr. THOMAS WALTERS, solicitor, of Carmarthen, has been appointed by solicitor in 1836, and bad practised for many years at Gravesend. He was a

the high sheriff of Carmarthenshire (Mr. Frederick Lewis) to be Underperpetual commissioner for the county of Kent, and had a very extensive

Sheriff of that county for the current year. Mr. Walters was admitted a private business. Mr. Hilder also held several important appointments. He | solicitor in 1876. had been for several years high bailiff of the Gravesend and Dartford County Mr. JOHN LLOYD GRIFFITIIS, solicitor and notary, of Beadmaris and Courts (Circuit No. 48), and clerk to the deputy-lieutenants for the Gravesend Holyhead, has been appointed by the high sberiff of Anglesea (Mr. Hugh District of the county. He was also coroner for the borough of Gravesend. A Edwarda) to be Under-Sheriff of that county for the current year. Mr. few years ago be was appointed a magistrate for the borough.

Griffiths was admitted a solicitor in 1865. He is town olerk of the borough of Beaumaris.

Mr. Francis TREGONWELL JOHNs, solicitor, proctor, and notary, of Bland.

ford, has been appointed by the high sheriff of Dorsetsbire (Mr. Charles NEW ORDERS, &c.

Hambro) to be Under-Sheriff of tbat county for the oorrent year. Mr. Johns

is registrar of the Blandford County Court, district probate registrar, and HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE.

registrar of the Archdeaconry of Dorset. He was admitted a solioitor in CHANCERY DIVISION.

1843, and he is in partnership with Mr. Sinolair Traill, the clerk to the

Blandford Local Board.
Notice.- Easter Vacation, 1882.

Mr. EDWARD LAMB WAUGH, solicitor, of Cookermouth, has been appointed There will be no sitting in court in the Easter Vacation.

by the high sheriff of Camberland (Mr. George Routledge) to be UnderDuring the vacation all applications which may require to be imme

Sheriff of that oounty for the current year. Mr. Waugh is the son of Mr. diately or promptly heard are to be made to the honourable Mr. Justice

Edward Waugb, solicitor, M.P. for Cookermouth. He was admitted & Kay, at Judges' Chambers, Royal Courts of Justice.

solicitor in 1873. In any case of great argenoy, wbon not sitting in judges' chambers, the brief of counsel may be sent to the Vacation Judge by book-post, or parcel,

Mr. GEORGE CHARLES KENT, solicitor, of Longton, has been appointed a prepaid, accompanied by office copies of the affidavits in support of the

Perpetual Commissioner for taking the Aoknowledgments of Deeds by application, and also by a minute, on a separate sheet of paper, signed by

Married Women for Staffordshire and the City of Lichfield. counsel, of the order he may consider the applicant entitled to, and an Mr. HUMPHREY THOMAS CROWTHER GWYNN, solicitor (of the firm of Gwynn, envelope capable of receiving the papers, and addressed as follows: Nunneley, & Gwyon), of Bristol and Thornbury, has been appointed a “Chancery Official Letter: To the Registrar in Vacation, Chancery Registrars' Perpetual Commissioner for taking the Acknowledgments of Deeds by Married Office, Chancery-lane, Lordon, W.C.

Women for Gloucestershire and Somersetshire, and the City of Bristol. On applioations for ipjanctions or writs of ne exeat regno, in addition to

Mr. BENJAMIN BONNBR, solicitor, proctor, and notary, of Gloucestershire, the above, there must also be sent the original writ, or a copy of it with

has been appointed a Magistrate for that city. Mr. Bonner was admitted & the indorsements thereon, a copy of the statement of olaim (if any), and, if

solicitor in 1852. He is secretary to the Bishop of Gloucester, and registrar of the original writ is not sent, a certificate that it has been issued.

the diocese. The papers sent to the vacation judge will be returned to the registrar. The address of the vacation jadge when not sitting in judges' chambers

Mr. WILLIAM CHARLES CRIPPS, solicitor, of Tunbridge Wells, has been can bo obtained on application at the Chancery Registrars' Chambers, Royal

appointed Solicitor to the Tunbridge Wells Freehold Land Society, in sucCourts of Justice (Room 136).

cession to his father, the late Mr. William Charles Cripps, senior. The chambers of Mr. Justice Chitty will be open on Satarday, April 8, Mr. GEORGE LAYTON, solioitor (of the firm of Radoliffe, Layton & Steel), from 11 till 1.

Liverpool, has been appointed & Perpetual Commissioner for taking the On Good Friday, and on Monday and Taesday in Easter week, the judges' Acknowledgments of Deeds by Married Women. chambers and Chancery offices will not be open : ord. 61, r. 4. Chancery Registrars' Chambers, April 5, 1882.

DISSOLUTIONS OF PARINERSHIPS.

Horace COLLINS, TAOMAS WILKINSON, and J. WATSON STOCKER, solicitors, The committee for promoting a memorial to the late Mr. Street met on | 88, London-street, Greenwich. Maroh 24. The business will henoeforth Tuesday in the central hall of the Royal Courts of Justice, when, on the

on the be continued by Horace Collins and Thomas Wilkinson. proposal of the Prince of Wales, it was resolved to place a full-length figure of

[Gazette, March 31.] the lamented architect in one of the bays of the central ball. Mr. H, H. HORATIO WILLIAM SOUTHALL and WILLIAM THOMAS, solicitors, 24, Armstead, R.A., was selected as the sculptor.

| Waterloo-street, Birmingham (Southall, Thomas, & Southall). Maroh 25.

CREDITORS' CLAIMS.

Mar 25.

Bridge stoUNT MANUFA Alfred Audi Bacon, V.Cicial liquidatorn.-Petition 10 Phelps

Solicitors for the petit COMPANY, LIMITED: Trook,'to be official liqulu 12, at

[ocr errors]

The said Horatio William Soutball will in future carry on business at No. 32, Waterloo-street aforesaid, and the said William Thomas will continue to carry on business at No. 24, Waterloo-street, aforesaid.

[Gazette, April 4.]

CREDITORS UNDER ESTATES IN CHANCERY.

LAST DAY OF PROOF.
COMPANIES.

ANDREWS, GEORGE, Gt Suffolk st, Southwark, Sorter in the General Post Office. April

17. Andrews v Joslin, Fry, J. Naunton, Cheapside
ARCHER, WILLIAM ROBSON, Lowestoft. April 14.* Balls v Archer, Chitty, J. Stevens,

Norwich
WINDING-UP NOTICES.

BANCROFT, JOIN, Sheffield, Gentleman. April 18. Baker v Buxton, Chitty, J. Porrett,
Joint STOCK COMPANIES.

Sheffield
LIMITED IN CIANCERY.

BROME, MARGARET, Bath. April 29. Martindale v Freeman, Hall, V.C. Gordon, New

Broad st
CAPITAL FIRE INSURANCE ASSOCIATION, LIMITED.-Petition for winding up, presented
Mar 25, directed to be heard before Chitty, J., on April 22. Howard and Co, New

HAYWOOD, William, Littleham, Devon, Farmer. April 29. Haywood v Haywood,

Hall, V.0. Adams, Exmouth ENGLISH MOUNT MANUFACTURING COMPANY, LIMITED,-Chitty, J., has, by an order

MILLINGTON, JOIN, Leicester, Brick Maker. May 1. Millington v Millington, Hall, dated Mar 20, appointed Alfred Audrey Broad, 35, Walbrook, to be official liquidator

V.C. Curtis, Leicester

[Gazette, Mar. 21.] GENERAL FINANCIAL BANK, LIMITED.-Bacon, V.O., has fixed Wednesday, April 12, at 12, at his chambers, for the appointment of an official liquidator

FRANCIS, WILLIAM GEORGE KNAPP, East Dereham, Norfolk, Auctioneer. April 21. LYDNEY AND LYDBROOK STEEL AND TIN PLATE COMPANY, LIMITED,-Petition for wind. Francis v Baker, Chitty, J. Cooper, East Dereham

ing up, presented Mar 27, directed to be heard before Hall, V.C., on April 21. Phelps GORE, CLARA ERSWELL, Margate. April 21. Starkey v The Governors of Queen Anne's and Co, Gresham st, solicitors for the petitioner

Bounty, Hall. V.O. Houghtons and Byfield, Gracechurch st NEW HEY COTTON SPINNING AND MANUFACTURING COMPANY, LIMITED, -Petition for HOPE, THOMAS, Gt Longstone, Derby, Wheelwright. April 29. Woodhouse v Hope,

winding up, presented Mar 22, directed to be heard before Hall, V.O., on April 21. Hall, V.O. Štone, Wirksworth

Gregory and Co, Bedford row, agents for Wright, Bacup, solicitor for the petitioner KING, BERNARD, Richmond rd, Barnsbury, Boot Manufacturer. April 29. King v King, WAITWORTI PARK GRAND STAND COMPANY, LIMITED.-Hall, V.C., has, by an order Chitty, J. May, Bishopsgaté st Without dated Mar 15, appointed Benjamin Smyrke, Sunderland, to be official liquidator TORKINGTON, OSGOOD, Holly lodge, Clapham park, Esq. April 21. Smith v Williams, [Gazette, Mar. 31.] Hall, V.C. Boyle, Mecklenburgh sq

[Gazette, Mar. 24.] COLUMBIA MARKET GENERAL CO-OPERATIVE STORES, LIMITED.-Hall, V.C., has fixed

Apr 18 at 1 at the Royal Courts of Justice for the appointment of an official liquidator BURY, RICHARD LEE, New Haw, Addlestone, Chertsey. April 25. Madeley v Bury, FINE ARTS ALLIANCE CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY, LIMITED.-Hall, V.C., has by an order, Chitty, J. Trinder, St Helen's place

dated Mar 18, appointed Charles Minshull, 19, Change alley, to be official liquidator. FAULKNER, Isaac, Manchester, Gent. May 1. Gardiner v Faulkner, Hall, V.C. Creditors are required, on or before May 10, to send their names and addresses, and Broome, Staple inn the particulars of their debts or claims, to the above. May 17 at 1 is appointed for HALLER, WILLIAM, Cliffe-cum-Lund, York, Farmer. April 24. Haller v Haller, Chitty, hearing and adjudicating upon the debts and claims

J. Young, York HAWKSTOR CHINA CLAY COMPANY, LIMITED.-Kay, J., has by an order, dated Feb 7, HICKMAN, SHADRACH, Oaken, Stafford, Farmer. April 25. Fisher v Hartill, Fry, J. appointed Herbert Ernest Matthew Davies, 5, Queen st, Cheapside, to be official Neve, Wolverhampton liquidator. Creditors are required, on or before May 1, to send their names and MOFFATT, JAMES ROMULUS, Mirfield, York, Maltster. April 25. Moffatt v Moffatt, Fry, addresses, and the particulars of their debts or claims, to the above. May 15 at 12 is J. Rhodes, Halifax appointed for hearing and adjudicating upon the debts and claims

PULTON, HARRIET, Witchampton, Dorset. April 22. Lake v Warren, Chitty, J. Smith, STANDARD CREDIT COMPANY, LIMITED.-Petition for winding up, presented Mar 29, Blandford Forum, Dorset directed to be heard before Hall d before Hall, V.O., on Apr 21. Solomon, Finsbury pavement,

(Gazette, Mar. 28.] solicitor for the petitioner STBAHAN AND COMPANY, LIMITED.-Petition for winding up, presented Apr 1, directed

to be heard before Fry, J., on Apr 21, Phelps and Co, Gresham st, solicitors for the petitioner

CREDITORS UNDER 22 & 23 VICT. CAP. 35. Sux ELECTRIC LIGHT COMPANY, LIMITED.-Creditors are required, on or before May 10,

LAST DAY OF CLAIM. to send their names and addresses, and the particulars of their debts or claims, to Henry Threlkeld Edwards, 66, Coleman st. May 23 at 12 is appointed for hearing APPLETON, JOHN, Crosby sq, Gent. Apr 17. Oxley, Crosby sq and adjudicating upon the debts and claims

ARKELL, John, Stratton si Margaret, Wilts, Brewer. May 6. Kinneir and Tombs,

[Gazette, April 4.] Swindon UNLIMITED IN CHANOBRY,

BALLERAS, GUILLERMO ESTEBAN, Carlton rd, Maida Vale, Merchant. May 1. Thomson POTTERIES, SHREWSBURY, AND NORTH WALES RAILWAY COMPANY.-Petition for winding and Co, Cornhill

up, presented Mar 30, directed to be heard before Fry, J., on April 21. Markby and BATTYE, WYNYARD, Weybridge, Surrey, Retired Major. May 1. Nisbet and Daw, Co, Coleman st, solicitors for the petitioners

Lincoln's-inn-fields

[Gazette, Mar. 31.] BOYCE, ALFRED GEORGE, Eastmeon, Southampton, Saddler. May 25. Albery and BRIGHTON AQUARIUM COMPANY. -Petition for winding up, presented Apr 1, directed Lucas, Midhurst, Sussex

to be heard before Fry, J., on Apr 21. Hughes and Son, Bedford st, Covent Garden, BROAD, JAMES COTTLE, Upper st, Islington, Builder. May 1. Mason, Chancery lane solicitors for the petitioner

BROWN, MARTIN, Tynemouth, Farmer, June 1. Lietch and Co, North Shields

[Gazette, April. 4.] BRUNSKILL, WILLIAM, St Helen's, Lancaster, Registrar of Births. Apr 10. Barrow and COUNTY PALATINE OF LANCASTER.

Cook, St Helen's HANLEY AND BUCKNELL COAL COMPANY, LIMITED.-By an order made by the V.C., Cassan, Thomas, Lewisham High rd, Captain. Apr 24. Tompson and Co, Lincoln's dated Mar 23, it was ordered that the company be wound up. Newall, Ashton under Lyne, solicitor for the petitioners

CLARK, JOIN, Comberbach, Chester, Gent. Apr 30. Fletcher, Northwich

[Gazette, April 4.] CLARK, SARAH ELIZABETH, Hartley, Southampton, May 15. İLamb and Brooks, Odiham STANNARIES OF CORNWALL.

CROCKER, GEORGE, Faversham, Kent, Sailmaker. Apr 11. Tassell and Son, Faversham CALLINGTON CorsoLS. LIVITE_Petition for winding un presented Mar 25. directed to I CROFT, HENRY, Heysham, Lancaster. June 21. Whitaker. Lancast be heard before the Vice-Warden, at the Law Institution, Chancery lane, on Monday, DRAKE, Sir WILLIAM HENRY, Clanricarde gardens, Bayswater, K.C.B. May 1. Flux April 17 at 3. Affidavits intended to be used at the hearing, in opposition to the and Co, East India avenue petition, must be filed at the Registrar's Omce, Truro, on or before April 15, and ECCLES, FRANCES COATES, Lansdowne crescent, Kensington park. April 28. Tidswell, notice thereof must at the same time be given to the petitioner, his solicitors, or their Manchester agent. Cock, Truro, agent for Snell and Co, George St, Mansion House, petitioner's EXALL, WILLIAM, Reading, Engineer. June 1. Andrewes, Gresham bldgs solicitors

FARMER, WILLIAM, Nottingham, Hotel Proprietor. May 8. Barlow, Nottingham

[Gazette, Mar. 31.] FRY, JOIN, Clapton pk, Gent. April 24. Harling, Fetter lane, Fleet st FRIENDLY SOCIETIES DISSOLVED.

GEORGE, DAVID, Cheltenham, Confectioner, and CHARLOTTE GEORGE. June 1. Griffiths, EVEXING STAR LODGE LEICESTER INDEPENDENT ORDER OF ODD FELLOWS, Old Plough

Cheltenham Inn, Wigston, Leicester. Mar 30

GILMOUR, John, Sandringham gardens, Ealing. May 10. Gresham and Davies, Basing

hall st [Gazette, April 4.]

GRIERSON, HARRIET DOBOTABA DANIELL, Great Yarmouth. May 1. Nisbet and Daw,

Lincoln's-inn-fields
HALL, CHARLES, Tolleshunt Knights, Essex, Farmer. May 8. Turner and Co, Colches.

ter At the Worship-street Police Court on Saturday, Mr. Bushby gave his decision regarding an application made on behalf of a firm of cigar makers for

HANBURY, DANIEL BELL, Hollywood, Clapham common, Esq. May 1. Flux and Co,

East India avenue summonses against two female apprentices, who having, since their signing of HEAD, GEORGE, Newgate Market, Licensed Victualler. Apr 26. Nowbon and Co, their indentares, married, now repudiated the contract. Mr. Bushby said he

Wardrobe pl, Doctors' commons had carefully considered the matter, and he was of opinion that the marriage

HERBERT, John, Church st, Fulham, Licensed Victualler. May 1. Nicholls, Lincoln's

inn fields of the apprentices had rendered the contract void. "He therefore refused to Hodsox, John, Kirkbampton, Cumberland, Esq. April 8. Saul, Carlisle grant the summonses. He had searched the law reports, and could find HUTCHINGS, JOIN, Plymouth, Gent. April 15. Palmer, Doncaster

KNOWLES, MARY, Ashton-under-Lyne. Apr 25. Clayton, Ashton-under-Lyne notbing directly bearing on the point, and he should, therefore, be glad if the

KNOWLES, RALPX, Ashton-under-Lyne, Gent. Apr 25. Clayton, Ashton-under-Lyne applicants would apply for a mandamus, so that the matter could be argued MANGLES, SELINA THERESA, Sunningdale, Berks. May 1. Young and Co, St Mildred's before a superior court. Mr. Abbott said he had no doubt his clients would ct, Poultry take that course, as it was a matter of great importance, not only to them, but

ORR, JAMES, Liverpool, Gent. Apr 12. Mason and Grierson, Liverpool

PEARCE, CHARLES, Hove, Sussex, Esq. June 30. Pearce, Abchurch yard to all largo firms who were employers of female labour.

PORRITT, JONATHÁN, Bradford, Wool Merchant. May 6. Gardiner and Jeffery, Bradford At the Stock and Share Auction Company's sale, held on Tuesday at

RICE, JESSE, Bristol, Painter, May 1. Wise, Bristol

Scott, JAMES, Southend, Hotel Proprietor. Apr 29. Gregson, Southend their sale-roon, the following were amongst the prioos obtained :-Port SNELGROVE, CAROLINE FRANCES, Donhead St Andrew, Wilts. Apr 15. Nodder and Philip and Colonial Gold Mining, 3s. 60. ; Pary's Copper Corporation £1 Gater, Salisbury shares, 108. ; Consolidated Mining, 3s. 6d.; La Plata Mining £2 shares,

SUTCLIFFE, Graci, Bradford. May 6. Gardiner and Jeffery, Bradford

TENNANT, CHARLES, The Boltons, South Kensington. Apr 21. Hawkes and Co, Boro' par ; Doron Friendship Mining £1 sbares, 58. 9d. ; South Darren Mining High st £1 102. shares, 158. ; Tocopilla Copper Mining and Smelting £1 shares, TREHERNE, HENRY, Ashperton, Horeford, Farmer. May 9. Masefield and Sons, 78. 6d. paid, 98. 60.

Ledbury

WALKER, ANN, Sheffield. Apr 27. Rodgers and Co, Sheffield PERFECT DAYLIGHT.-Chappuis' Reflectors supersede gas in daytime, and improve WEBSTER, RICHARD, Queen Victoria st, Watchmaker. May 13. Simpson and Cullingnatural daylight. They can be adapted to any window, fanlight, skylight, area-light, ford, Gracechurch st &c., wherever natural light is impeded owing to the bad construction of premises or the WELCE, ELIZABETA COLEMAN, East Stonehouse, Devon. June 25. Wilson, Plymouth proximity of walls or buildings. They will be found to promote health, comfort, and WHITEHILL, CHARLES STEPIEN, Brighton, Colonel. Apr 29. Makinson and Carpenter, economy. They can also be used as screens or blinds, and at the same time they act as Devereux ct, Temple daylight diffusers. More than 30,000 are in use in London alone. For prospectuses, WHITTINGHAM, WILLIAM, Liverpool, Gent, May 1, Morocroft and Winstanley, Liver address two stamps to (S. J.) Chappuis, patentee and manufacturer, 60, Fleet-street, pool (LDYT.)

[Gazette, Mar, 24.

inn

LEGISLATION OF THE WEEK.

Stanford, Thomas, Sydenham, Kent, Grocer. Pet Mar 28. Pitt-Taylor. Greenwich,

April 14 at 1
Tompson, John, Birmingham, Gent. Pet Mar 27. Parry. Birmingham, April 17 at 2

TUESDAY, April 4, 1882.

Under the Bankruptcy Act, 1869.
HOUSE OF LORDS.

Creditors must forward their proofs of debts to the Registrar.
March 30.-Bills Read a Third Time.

To Surrender in London.
PRIVATE Bills.-Bristol Water ; London and St. Katharine's Docks.

Harnett, Phoebe, Goldhawk rd, Hammersmith, Corn Dealer. Pet Mar 31. Murray.

April 18 at 12.30
Bill Read a First Time.

Pike, Boaz Joseph, Whitecross st, Cripplegate, Artificial Florist. Pet Mar 30. Hazlitt. Duke of Albany (Establishment).

April 19 at 2
March 31.Bills Read a First Time.

To Surrender in the Country.

Brocklehurst, William, Preston, Draper. Pet Mar 31. Kulton. Preston, April 21 at 11 Bills of Sale Act Amendment ; Union of Benefices Act Amendment.

Cresswell, John Pearson, Wolverhampton, Surgeon, Pet April 3. Sanders. Wolver. Bill Read a Second Time,

hampton, April 17 at 12 Duke of Albany (Establishment).

Cuthbert, William James, Blackpool, Lancaster, Toy Dealer. Pet April 1. Hulton.

Preston, April 21 at 11.30
Dewes, Henry, Nuneaton, Warwick, Solicitor. Pet Mar 30. Kirby. Coventry, April

25 at 2
HOUSE OF COMMONS.

Newall, Alice Ann, Cheadle, Chester, Draper. Pet Mar 30. Hyde. Stockport, April March 30.-Bill Read a Second Time.

17 at 11 PRIVATE BILL.-Peckham, East Dulwich, and Crystal Palace Tramways.

BANKRUPTCIES ANNULLED.
Bills Read a Third Time.

TUESDAY, April 4, 1882.
PRIVATE BILLS.-Goldon Valley Railway ; Nottingham Corporation.

Gray, Philip Edward, Cambridge, Innkeeper. Mar 22.
Bill Read a First Time,

Liquidations by Arrangemont.
Bill to disfranchise, permanently or temporarily, on account of corrupt
practices, certain cities and boroughs, and to disqualify certain voters (The

FIRST MEETINGS OF CREDITORS.
ATTORNEY GENERAL).

FRIDAY, March 31, 1882.
March 31.-Bills Read a Second Time.

Backett, Isaac, Angell rd, Brixton, Accountant. Apr 17 at 2 at office of Norris and PRIVATE BILLS.-Forcett Railway (Extension); Lynn and Fakenbam Rail.

Norris, Bedford row .

Bagnall, Ephraim, Eccleshall, Machine Proprietor. Apr 14 at 11.30 at Vine Hotel, way; Thames Deep Water Dock Railway.

Stafford. Tennant and Co, Hanley
Bilis Read a Third Time.

Bainbridge, Walter, Grantham, Draper. Apr 12 at 12 at office of Schofield, St Peter's PRIVATE BILLS.-Alnwick Corporation ; Welshpool und Llanfair Railway

hill, Grantham

Baker, William, Towcester, Nortbampton, Shoe Manufacturer. Apr 14 at 11 at Angel (Abandonment); West Ham Local Board."

Hotel, Northampton, Whitton, Towcester
April 3.-Bills Read a Second Time.

Banks, Samuel, Featherstone, York, Shopkeeper. Apr 13 at 3 at offices of Horner and PRIVATE BILLS.- Agricultural Company of Mauritius ; Maidstone Water ;

Edmondson, Wood st, Wakefield West Metropolitan Tramways.

Barnes, Thomas, Tilehurst, Berks, out of business. Apr 14 at 3 at 18, the Forbury,

Reading. Creed Army (Annual).

Barnett, Dawson, Finsbury pavement, Umbrella Manufacturer. Apr 12 at 3 at office of Bills Read a Third Time.

Goldring, White Lion st, Norton Folgate • PRIVATE BILLS.-Metropolitan Markets (Fisb, &c.); North-Eastern Rail.

Belcher, James, Reading, Builder. Apr 17 at 11 at offices of Newman, Friar st, Read.

ing way (Alnwick and Cornbill Brancb).

Bianchi, Francis, and Robert Maxwell Fabris, Gresham st, Wholesale Ironmongers. New Bills.

Apr 18 at 3 at Guildhall Tavern, Gresham st. Wilkins and Fanshawe, Founders' Hall, Bill to facilitate and regulate the supply of electricity for lighting and other

St Swithin's lane

Bradshaw, Nicholas, Accrington, Draper. Apr 13 at 3 at Peel's Arms Hotel, Whalley puropees in Great Britain and Ireland (Mr. ASHLEY).

rd, Accrington, Whalley, Accrington Bill for consolidating the Acts relating to the Militia and the Acts relating: Briggs, William Alexander, Salford, Licensed Victualler. Apr 24 at 3 at offices of to the Reserve Forces (Mr. O. MORGAN).

Smythe and Sykes, King st, Manchester

Brown, Samuel George, High st, Shadwell, Plumber. Apr 19 at 2 at office of Wood. April 4.-Bills Read a Second Time.

leigh, Guildhall chmbrs, Basinghall st. Hewitt, Nicholas lane PRIVATE BILLS.--Cheadle Railway ; Newquay Water; Solway Junction Brown, William, Shrewsbury, Salop, Coal Merchant. Apr 14 at 11 at office of Morris, Railway ; Westgate and Birchington Gas.

Swan Hill, Shrewsbury
Brown, William Frederick, Northampton, Baker. Apr 13 at 11 at office of Andrew,

Market sg, Northampton
Bryant, William, Bristol, Butcher. Apr 13 at 12 at office of Clifton and Carter, Broad

st, Bristol

Buckley, John, and George Buckley, Hockley, Warwick, Spoon and Fork Makers.
COURT PAPERS.

Apr 17 at 11 at 57, Colmore row, Birmingham. Bayley
Clark, John, Longtown, Cumberland, Watch Maker. Apr 17 at 3 at office of Errington;

Bank st, Carlisle

Collins, George, Greet, Worcester, Accountant's Clerk, Apr 14 at 12 at office of Jelf, SUPREME COURT OF JUDICATURE.

Waterloo st, Birmingham

Collins, John, Birmingham, Wholesale Grocer. Apr 13 at 3 at office of Wright and ROTA OF REGISTRARS IN ATTENDANCE ON

Marshall, New st, Birmingham

Coutts, William George, Pershore, Worcester, Painter. Apr 13 at 11 at office of Pace,
Date.

COURT OF Y. C. Bacon. V.C. HALL. Bridge st, Pershore
APPEAL.

Crichton, James, Commercial Sale Room, Mincing lane, Merchant. Apr 24 at 3 at office Wednesday, April,....... 12 Mr. Jackson Mr. King Mr. Koo

of Cooper and Co, George st, Mansion House Hollams and Co, Mincing lane Thursday ..............

Cobby
Merivale

Clowes

Dickerson, Charles, sen, Weldegrave rd, Turnpike rd, Hornsey. 'Apr 8 at 11 at office of
Jackson
King

кое

Hawkins, North bldgs, Eldon st, Finsbury
Saturday ........

Apr 13 at 3 at office of Southall,
Cobby
Merivale Clowes

Dickin, John, Birmingham, Window Blind Maker.

Waterloo st, Birmingham
Mr. Justice Mr. Justice Mr. Justice

Dunn, Edward Thomas, Bouverie st, Fleet st, Varnish Manufacturer. Apr 17 at 3 at
FRY,
KAY,
CHITTY.

office of Dyte and Stead, Chancery lane. Venn and Woodcock, New inn, Strand Wednesday, April......., 12 Mr. Ward Mr. Farrer Mr. Carrington

Durling, George, Chatham, Grocer. Apr 13 at 3 at King's Head Hotel, High st, Roches

ter, Shakespear, Chatham Pemberton Teesdale

Latham

Emmerson, Alexander George, Kew Bridge rd, Brentford, Sailmaker. Apr 24 at 3 at Friday ................

Ward
Farrer

Carrington

office of Incorporated Law Society, Chancery lane. Woodbridgo and Sons, BrentSaturday......

Pemberton Teesdale

Latham

ford Everitt, Henry, Ardleigh, Essex, Farmer. Apr 14 at 11 at office of Pope and Co, Trinity

st, Colchester. Marshall, Colchester Evison, John, Falsgrave, Scarborough, York, Grocer. Apr 11 at 11 at Bell Hotel, Drif.

field. Appleyard, Scarborough · SALE OF ENSUING WEEK.

Fairman, Francis, Bletchingly, Surrey, Farmer. Apr 18 at 3 at office of Morrison, High

st, Reiga te April 13.-Mesøre. C. C. & T. MOORE, at the Mart, at 1 for 2 p.m., Freehold and

Farr, Edward Robinson, Nottingham, Provision Merchant. Apr 14 at 2 at Assembly

rooms, Low pavement, Nottingham, Martin and Son, Nottingham Leasehold Estates (see advertisement this week, page 4).

Fenton, James, and John Long, Deptford Bridge, Kent, Coal and Coke Merchants.

Apr 21 at 3 at Tudor House, 120, Greenwich road. Miller and Co, Greenwich
Findon, John, Cannock, Stafford, Grocer, Apr 14 at 11 at the Bridge, Walsall. Loxton,

Walsall
Fisher, Walter, Bristol, Printer. Apr 12 at 2 at offices of Cumberland, Clare st,

Bristol
Fisher, Walter, Filey, York, Photographer. Apr 12 at 3 at offices of Watts and

_Kitching, Queen st, Scarborough
Bankrupts.

Flanagan, William, 'Oldham, Greengrocer. Apr 19 at 3 at offices of Simpson and

Hockin, Mount st, Albert sg, Manchester
FRIDAY, March 31, 1882.

Flexman, David, Great Beddow, Essex, Farmer. Apr 14 at 11 at offices of Meggy,
Under the Bankruptcy Act, 1869.

Duke st, Chelmsford
Creditors must forward their proofs of debts to the Registrar.

Gregory, John Moss, Rosslyn hill, Hampstead, Watchmaker. Apr 13 at 3 at offices of
To Surrender in London.

Dear, Gresham st Edwards, Frederick Allen, Bishopsgate st, Architect. Pet Mar 29. Brougham. April | Hancox, Thomas, and William Hancox, King's heath, Builders. Apr 14 at 11 at offices 18 at 12

of Thomas, Waterloo st, Birmingham Fielder, Edward, Milk st, Cheapside, Merchant. Pet Mar 29. Brougham. April 18 at 1 Haward, Horace, Portland rd, Wholesale Grocer. Apr 13 at 12 at offices of Creditors' Guscotte, Thomas, York bldgs, Adelphi, Solicitor. Pet Mar 29. Brougham. April 18 Association of Wholesale Grocers, Arthur et, East. Godfrey, Chancery lane at 2

Hawkins, Henry, Old Kent rd, Camberwell, Baker. Apr 18 at 3 at Masons' Hall tavern, Toomer, Frederick, Sandringham rd, Cabinet Manufacturer. Pet Mar 29. Brougham. Masons' avenue. Fowler and Co, Borough High st, Southwark April 19 at 1

Hertzog, Alfred, Salford, Lancaster, Clothes Dealer. Apr 19 at 3 at offices of Sims, Webber, Edward, Great Winchester st, Wine Merchant. Pet Mar 24. Pepys. April 19 Market place, Manchester at 12

Higham, Maria, Barrow in Furness, Draper. Apr 11 at 11 at the Imperial Hotel, CornTo Surrender in the Country.

wallis st, Barrow in Furness. Nalder and Jones, Barrow in Furness Gill, John, Low Butterknowle Farm, nr Cockfield, Durham, Farmer. Pet Mar 29. | Holgate, Octavius, Ipswich, Baker, Apr 19 at 2 at No, 7, St. Lawrence st, Ipswich, Marshall, Durham, Mar 29 at 11

Pollard

C

Friday..

Thursday ..............

LONDON GAZETTES.

FRIDAY, Marce' Act, 1869. a

A

[ocr errors]
« PreviousContinue »