What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
action affirmed agent alleged amount Appellate Court appellee applied appointed assessment authority bill building cause certificate charge Chicago circuit court Civil Service act claim complainants condition constitution construction contract corporation cost damages decree deed defendant delivered district duty entered evidence execution exercise existence fact filed fire firm follows further give given ground held hold houses improvement injury instruction interest issued John Judge judgment jury JUSTICE land lots matter means ment named necessary negligence notice objection October 24 operate opinion owner paid parties passed payment persons petition plaintiff in error plea present proceeding purchase question Railroad reason received record reference refused rule Service statute street sufficient sustained tion train trial trust wall witness
Page 599 - I do solemnly swear (or affirm, as the case may be) that I will support the constitution of the United States, and the constitution of the State of New York ; and that I will faithfully discharge the duties of the office of , according to the best of my ability.
Page 417 - In determining what is proximate cause, the true rule is that the injury must be the natural and probable consequence of the negligence ; such a consequence as, under the surrounding circumstances of the case, might and ought to have been seen by the wrongdoer as likely to flow from his act.
Page 317 - ... a question of fact for the jury, and not of law for the court.
Page 170 - If reference be had to its use in the common affairs of the world, or in approved authors, we find that it frequently imports no more than that one thing is convenient or useful or essential to another. To employ the means necessary to an end is generally understood as employing any means calculated to produce the end, and not as being confined to those single means, without which the end would be entirely unattainable.
Page 476 - ... jury if there was any evidence, even a scintilla, in support of the case ; but it is now settled that the question for the judge (subject of course to review) is, as is stated by Maule, J., in Jewell v.
Page 415 - Damages arising from mere sudden terror, unaccompanied by any actual physical injury, but occasioning a nervous or mental shock, cannot, under such circumstances, their lordships think, be considered a consequence which, in the ordinary course of things, would flow from the negligence of the gatekeeper.
Page 473 - It is the settled law of this court that, when the evidence given at the trial, with all the inferences which the jury could justifiably draw from it, is insufficient to support a verdict for the plaintiff, so that such a verdict, if returned, must be set aside, the court is not bound to submit the case to the jury, but may direct a verdict for the defendant.
Page 115 - If, with the consent of this company, an interest under this policy shall exist in favor of a mortgagee or of any person or corporation having an interest in the subject of insurance other than the interest of the insured as described herein, the conditions hereinbefore contained shall apply in the manner expressed in such provisions and conditions of insurance relating to such interest as shall be written upon, attached, or appended hereto.
Page 170 - It is essential to just construction that many words which import something excessive should be understood in a more mitigated sense, — in that sense which common usage justifies. The word " necessary