Hearings, Reports and Prints of the Senate Committee on the JudiciaryU.S. Government Printing Office, 1977 - Administrative procedure |
Contents
| 1 | |
| 11 | |
| 30 | |
| 43 | |
| 55 | |
| 79 | |
| 114 | |
| 149 | |
| 420 | |
| 428 | |
| 429 | |
| 434 | |
| 447 | |
| 459 | |
| 484 | |
| 503 | |
| 197 | |
| 219 | |
| 221 | |
| 225 | |
| 244 | |
| 264 | |
| 278 | |
| 301 | |
| 320 | |
| 333 | |
| 343 | |
| 349 | |
| 366 | |
| 370 | |
| 384 | |
| 389 | |
| 403 | |
| 410 | |
| 511 | |
| 517 | |
| 599 | |
| 610 | |
| 615 | |
| 616 | |
| 628 | |
| 665 | |
| 743 | |
| 749 | |
| 1 | |
| 5 | |
| 27 | |
| 38 | |
| 44 | |
| 27 | |
| 346 | |
| 483 | |
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
administration antitrust appointment asked believe Bell's campaign Carswell Chairman EASTLAND citizens civil rights Clarence Mitchell class action COCHRAN Congress Constitution Court of Appeals decision desegregation discrimination district court elected enforcement Ernest Vandiver fact feel Fifth Circuit Georgia going Governor Vandiver Griffin Bell happened hearings integration involved issue JAWORSKI Judge Bell Judge Griffin judicial Julian Bond Justice Department kind KING lawyers legislation look massive resistance matter meeting MITCHELL NAACP National nomination opinion person plaintiffs political position President private clubs problem question racial RAUH record response role school board school desegregation segregation segregationist Senator ABOUREZK Senator BAYH Senator CHAFEE Senator HEINZ Senator KENNEDY Senator MATHIAS Senator RIEGLE Senator SASSER Sibley commission Sibley report statement Supreme Court talking testify testimony Thank thing tion U.S. attorney U.S. Supreme Court understand United vote
Popular passages
Page 30 - All executive departments and agencies shall administer their programs and activities relating to housing and urban development in a manner affirmatively to further the purposes of this title and shall cooperate with the Secretary to further such purposes.
Page 758 - Nothing in the Constitution or in the decision of the Supreme Court takes away from the people freedom to choose the schools they attend. The Constitution, in other words, does not require integration. It merely forbids discrimination. It does not forbid such segregation as occurs as the result of voluntary action. It merely forbids the use of governmental power to enforce segregation.
Page 758 - Legislation is powerless to eradicate racial instincts or to abolish distinctions based upon physical differences, and the attempt to do so can only result in accentuating the difficulties of the present situation.
Page 88 - General), (2) setting forth facts pertaining to such pattern or practice, and (3) requesting such relief, including an application for a permanent or temporary injunction, restraining order or other order against the person or persons responsible for such pattern or practice, as he deems necessary to insure the full enjoyment of the rights herein described.
Page 19 - If you have any further questions, please do not hesitate to contact me or Jason Albritton, Policy Associate (703/841-4105).
Page 215 - What happens to a dream deferred? Does it dry up like a raisin in the sun ? Or fester like a sore — And then run ? Does it stink like rotten meat? Or crust and sugar over — like a syrupy sweet? Maybe it just sags like a heavy load. Or does it explode?
Page 747 - Any justice or judge of the United States shall disqualify himself in any case in which he has a substantial interest, has been of counsel, is or has been a material witness, or is so related to or connected with any party or his attorney as to render it improper, in his opinion, for him to sit on the trial, appeal, or other proceeding therein.
Page 88 - Whenever the Attorney General has reasonable cause to believe that any person or group of persons is engaged in a pattern or practice...
Page 28 - STATEMENT OF ELMER B. STAATS, COMPTROLLER GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES Mr. Chairman and members of the subcommittee, we are pleased to appear here today to discuss the results of our review of the Government's investigation of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters' Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension Fund (the Fund).
Page 757 - It is important that we point out exactly what the Supreme Court has decided and what it has not decided in this case.