Federal Supplement: Cases Argued and Determined in the District Courts of the United States and the Court of Claims, with Key Number Annotations, Volume 235West Publishing Company, 1965 - Law reports, digests, etc |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 66
Page 44
... causes of action , it may for the present purposes conveniently be divided into two classes ; those causes of action chal- lenging Resolutions No. 21 , 26 , 36 , 37 , 38 and 39 ( causes of action 1 and 9 ) and those challenging the ...
... causes of action , it may for the present purposes conveniently be divided into two classes ; those causes of action chal- lenging Resolutions No. 21 , 26 , 36 , 37 , 38 and 39 ( causes of action 1 and 9 ) and those challenging the ...
Page 174
... cause of action with respect to reinstatement . See 29 U.S.C. § 413 ; Cox , supra , at 838. This determination is , however , without prejudice to the plaintiff's right to maintain such action as he may be advised in the appropriate ...
... cause of action with respect to reinstatement . See 29 U.S.C. § 413 ; Cox , supra , at 838. This determination is , however , without prejudice to the plaintiff's right to maintain such action as he may be advised in the appropriate ...
Page 189
... Actions § 22 , p . 17 . [ 6 ] The mere fact that the union is bringing this action instead of the in- dividual employees involved does not change the rule that the statute of limi- tations has barred this action . It is the cause of action ...
... Actions § 22 , p . 17 . [ 6 ] The mere fact that the union is bringing this action instead of the in- dividual employees involved does not change the rule that the statute of limi- tations has barred this action . It is the cause of action ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
affidavit agent agreement alleged amended amount appear application attorney Bank barge By-Laws Carolina cause of action charged CHIEF JUDGE chlorine Circuit Cite as 235 Civil claim Code collateral estoppel Company complaint constitute contends contract Corp corporation counsel damages decision defendant defendant's denied District Court District Judge employees entitled evidence F.Supp fact fendant filed fish food George Skouras Government habeas corpus held Hooker income interest Internal Revenue issue Jones Act judgment jurisdiction jury KEY NUMBER SYSTEM L.Ed Ledco liability license lien liquefied petroleum gas ment officer opinion parties patent person petitioner plaintiff prior reason record regulations royalty rule S.Ct Section service of process Skouras South Carolina Spanos statute suit summary judgment supra Supreme Court taxpayer testimony tiff tion Towing trial U. S. Atty union United States District Velsicol violation vote Westinghouse York