Reports of Cases Argued and Determined in the Ohio Circuit Courts...: Ohio Circuit Decisions, Volume 4Laning printing Company, 1893 - Law reports, digests, etc |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 88
Page 120
... testimony was received in evidence and some of it was excluded . His testimony was taken for the purpose and was offered as tending to show that Lewis was not a superior officer of Sutherland , that he really had no control over him ...
... testimony was received in evidence and some of it was excluded . His testimony was taken for the purpose and was offered as tending to show that Lewis was not a superior officer of Sutherland , that he really had no control over him ...
Page 137
... testimony , he saw this very fracas and saw Kessler there with the cue in his hand . We are forced to this conclusion in regard to Kessler's testimony , that so far as the final result of this affray is concerned , his testimony is of ...
... testimony , he saw this very fracas and saw Kessler there with the cue in his hand . We are forced to this conclusion in regard to Kessler's testimony , that so far as the final result of this affray is concerned , his testimony is of ...
Page 310
... testimony where one witness testifies that he did not hear a sound , and another testifies that he did hear it , or that he himself gave it , and quite a number of courts have held that the affirmative testimony is more valuable than ...
... testimony where one witness testifies that he did not hear a sound , and another testifies that he did hear it , or that he himself gave it , and quite a number of courts have held that the affirmative testimony is more valuable than ...
Contents
Van Glahn v Dunham | 177 |
866 | 363 |
Wabash Railroad Co v Norway 674 | 475 |
4 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
abutting action alleged amended amount appears apply assessment assignment attorney auditor authority averred bill of exceptions bond charge claim common pleas consent construction contract contributory negligence corporation Coshocton county council counsel court of common court of equity Crawford county creditors damages defendant in error demurrer duty entitled evidence execution fact filed Hamilton Circuit Court Hamilton county held Huron county injunction injury issue January Term John judgment jurisdiction jury land levied liability lien lots Lucas Circuit Court matter McConica ment mortgage motion negligence Ohio OHIO EX REL opinion ordinance overruled owner paid parties passed payment person petition in error plaintiff in error probate court proceedings prosecuting purpose question railroad company railway reason record rendered replevin Stat statute street Supreme Court taxes testimony thereof tion Toledo Topliff township trial trustees verdict village