U.S. 201: Head v. Amoskeag Mfg. Co., 113 U. S. 9; Barbier v. Connolly, 113 U'. S. 27; Provident Institution for Savings v. Mayor and Aldermen of Jersey City, 113 U. S. 506; Soon Hing v. Crowley, 113 U.S. 703; Ex parte Reggel, 114 U. S. 642; Wurts v. Hoagland, 114 U. S. 606: Kentucky Railroad Tax Cases, 115 U. S. 32f; Missouri Pacific R. R. Co. v. Humes, 115 U. S. 512; Campbell v. Holt, 115 U. S. 620; Presser v. Illinois, 116 U. S. 252; Railroad Commission Cases, 116 U. S. 307, 347. 352; Royall v. Virginia, 116 U. S. 572; Arrowsmith v. Harmoning, 118 U. S. 194; Yick Wo v. Hopkins, 118 U. S. 356; Santa Clara County v. Southern Pacific R. R. 118 U. S. 394; Philadelphia Fire Association v. New York, 119 U. S. 110: Home Insurance Co. v. New York, 119 U. S. 129; Schmidt v. Cobb, 119 U. S. 286; Kerr v. Illinois, 119 S. 436; Hayes v. Missouri. 120 U. S. 68; Baldwin v. Franks, 120 U. S. 678; Church v. Kelsey. 121 U. S. 282; Spies v. Illinois. 123 U. S. 131; Sands v. Manistee River Improvement Co.. 123 U. S. 288; Mulger v. Kansas, 123 U. S. 623; Pembina Mining Co. r. Pennsylvania, 125 U. S. 181; pencer v. Merchant, 125 U'. S. 345: Dow v. Beidelman, 15 U. S. 680; Bank of Redemption v. Boston, 125 U. S. 60; California v. Pacific Railroad Co., 127 U. S. 1: Bardo v. Lamb, 127 U. S. 38: Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. Mackey, 127 U. S. 205; Powell v. Pennsylvania, 127 US. 678: Mahon v. Justice, 127 U. S. 700; Kidd v. Pearson, 128 U. S. 1; Nashville, Chattanooga Railway v. Alabama, 128 U. S. 96; Watson v. Nevin, 128 U. S. 578; Minneapolis & St. Louis Railway v. Beckwith, 129 U. S. 26; Dent v. West Virginia, 129 U. S. 114: Huling v. Kaw Valley Railway & Improvement Co., 130 U. S. 559 : Freeland v. Williams, 131 U. S. 405; Cross v. North Carolina, 132 U. S. 131: Pennie v. Reis, 132 U. S. 464; Sugg v. Thornton, 132 U. S. 524; Manning v. French, 133 U. S. 186; Davis v. Beason, 133 S. 333: Palmer v. McMahon, 133 U. S. 650: Eilenbecker v. Plymouth County, 134 US. 31: Bell Gap R. R. Co. v. Pennsylvania, 134 U. S. 232: Chicago. Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. Minnesota, 134 U. S. 418; Minneapolis Eastern Railroad Co. v. Minnesota, 134 U. S. 467; Home Insurance Co. v. New York, 134 U. S. 594; Louisville & Nashville R. R. Co. v. Woodson, 134 U. S. 614; Cherokee Nation v. Southern Kansas R. R., 135 U. S. 641; In re Kemmler, 136 U. S. 436; York v. Texas, 137 U. S. 15; Crowley v. Christensen. 137 U. S. 86: Wheeler v. Jackson, 137 U. S. 245; Holden v. Minnesota. 137 U. S. 483; In re Converse, 137 U. S. 624; Caldwell v. Texas, 137 U'. S. 692; Kauffman V. Wooters, 138 U. S. 285; Leeper v. Texas, 139 U. S. 462; In re Manning, 139 U. S. 504; Natal v. Louisiana, 139 U. S. 621; Lent v. Tillson, 140 U. S. 316; In re Rahrer, 140 U. S. 545; New Orleans v. New Orleans Water Works Co., 142 U. S. 79; McElvaine v. Brush, 142 U. S. 155; Kaukauna Water Power Co. v. Green Bay & Mississippi Canal Co., 142 U. S. 254; Charlotte, Augusta & Columbia Railroad Co. v. Gibbes, 142 U. S. 386; Pacific Express Co. v. Seibert, 142 U. S. 339; Horn Silver Mining Co. v. New York, 143 U. S. 305: Budd v. New York, 143 U. S. 517; Schwab v. Berggren, 143 U. S. 442; Fielden v. Illinois, 143 U. S. 452; O'Neil v. Vermont. 144 U. S. 323; New York v. Squire, 145 U. S. 175; Brown v. Smart, 145 U. S. 454; McPherson v. Blacker, 146 U. S. 1; Morley v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern R. R. Co., 146 U. S. 162; Hallinger v. Davis, 146 U. S. 314; Yesler v. Washington Harbor Line Commissioners, 146 U. S. 646; Jennings v. Coal Ridge Improvement & Coal Co., 147 U. S. 147; Giozza v. Tiernan, 148 U. S. 657; Paulson v. Portland, 149 U. S. 30; Minneapolis & St. Louis Railway v. Emmons, 149 T. S. 364; Fong Yue Ting v. United States, 149 U. S. 698: McNulty v. California, 149 U. S. 645; Columbus Southern Railway Co. v. Wright, 151 U. S. 470; New York & New England Railroad Co. v. Bristol, 151 U. S. 556; Lawton v. Steele, 152 U. S. 133: Montana Co. v. St. Louis Mining and Milling Co., 152 U.S. 169: Duncan v. Missouri. 152 U. S. 377; Marchant v. Pennsylvania Railroad Co., 153 U. S. 380; Braes v. Stoeser, 153 U. S. 391; McKane v. Durston, 153 U. S. 684; Scott v. McNeal, 154 U. S. 34; Reagan v. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co.. 154 U'. S. 362; Pittsburg. Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Backus, 154 U. S. 421; St. Louis & San Francisco Railway Co. v. Gill. 156 U. S. 649; Bergeman v. Backer, 157 U. S. 655; Gray v. Connecticut, 159 U. S. 74; Central Land Co. v. Laidley, 159 U. S. 103; Moore v. Missouri, 159 U. S. 673; Winona & St. Peter Land Co. v. Minnesota, 159 U. S. 526; Iowa Central Railway Co. v. Iowa, 160 U. S. 389; Eldridge v. Trezevant. 160 U. S. 452; Gibson v. Mississippi. 162 U. S. 565; Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Taggart, 163 U. S. 1; Lowe v. Kansas, 163 U. S. 81; Plessy v. Ferguson, 163 U. S. 537; Talton v. Mayes, 163 U. S. 376; Fallbrook Irrigation District v. Bradley, 164 U. S. 112; Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. Nebraska. 164 U. S. 403: Covington & Lexington Turnpike Co. v. Sandford, 164 U. S. 578: St. Louis & San Francisco Railway Co. v. Matthews, 165 U. S. 1; Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fé Railway y. Ellis, 165 U. S. 150: Jones v. Brim, 165 U. S. 180; Adams Express Co. v. Ohio State Auditor. 165 U. S. 194: Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Indiana. 165 U. S. 304: Allgeyer v. Louisiana, 165 U. S. 578; N. Y., N. H. & Hartford R. R. v. New York, 165 U. S. 628; Allen v. Georgia, 166 I. S. 138; Chicago, Burlington & Quincy R. R. Co. v. Chicago, 166 U. S. 226; Gladson v. Minnesota, 166 U. S. 427; Sentell v. New Orleans & Carrollton R. R. Co., 166 U. S. 698; Henderson Bridge Co. v. Kentucky, 166 U. S. 150; Davis v. Massachusetts, 167 U. S. Oregon. September 19, 1866; Vermont, November 9, 1866: Georgia rejected it November 13. 1866, and ratified it July 21, 1868; North Carolina rejected it December 4, 1866, and ratified it July 4, 1868: South Carolina rejected it December 20, 1866, and ratified it July 9, 1868; New York ratified it January 10, 1867; Ohio ratified it January 11, 1867 (and the legislature of the same State passed a resolution in January, 1868, to withdraw its consent to it): Illinois ratified it January_15, 1867; West Virginia. January 16, 1867; Kansas, January 18, 1867: Maine, January 19, 1867: Nevada, January 22, 1867: Missouri, January 26, 1867; Indiana, January 29, 1867; Minnesota. February 1, 1867: Rhode Island, February 7, 1867; Wisconsin, February 13, 1867; Pennsylvania, February 13.1867: Michigan, February 15, 1867; Massachusetts, March 20,1867; Nebraska. June 15, 1867; Iowa, April 3, 1868; Arkansas, April 6, 1868; Florida. June 9, 1868: Louisiana. July 9, 1868; and Alabama July 13, 1868; Georgia again ratified the amendment February 2, 1870. Texas rejected it November 1. 1866, and ratified February 18, 1870. Virginia rejected it January 19, 1867. and ratified October S. 1869. The amendment was rejected by Kentucky January 10, 1867; by Delaware February 8, 1867; by Maryland March 23, 1867, and was not afterwards ratified by either State. 43; Merchants' & Manufacturers' Bank v. Pennsylvania, 167 U. S. 461; Turner v. New York, 168 U. S. 90; Craemer v. Washington State, 168 U. S. 124; Hodgson v. Vermont, 168 U. S. 262; Nobles v. Georgia, 168 U. S. 398; McHenry v. Alford, 168 U. S. 651; Holden v. Hardy, 169 U. S. 366; Smyth v. Ames, 169 U. S. 466; Wilson v. North Carolina, 169 U. S. 586; Savings & Loan Society v. Multnomah County, 169 U. S. 421; United States v. Wong Kim Ark. 169 U. S. 649; Backus v. Fort Street Union Depot Co., 169 U. S. 557; Williams v. Mississippi, 170 U. S. 213: Magoun v. Illinois Trust & Savings Bank, 170 U. S. 283; Williams v. Eggleston, 170 U. S. 304; Tinsley v. Anderson, 171 U. S. 101; King v. Mullins, 171 U. S. 404; New York v. Roberts, 171 U. S. 658; Meyer v. Richmond, 172 U. S. 82; Blake v. McClung, 172 U. S. 239; Norwood v. Baker, 172 C. S. 269; Orient Insurance Co. v. Daggs, 172 U. S. 557; Wilson v. Eureka City, 173 U. S. 32; Dewey v. Des Moines, 173 U. S. 193; St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. Paul, 173 U. S. 404; Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co. v. Smith, 173 U. S. 684; Central Loan & Trust Co. v. Campbell Commission Co., 173 U. S. 84; Henderson Bridge Co. v. Henderson City, 173 U. S. 592; Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fé R. R. Co. v. Matthews, 174 U. S. 96; Brown v. New Jersey, 175 U. S. 172: Addyston Pipe and Steel Co. v. United States, 175 U. S. 211; Tullis v. Lake Erie & Western R. R. Co., 175 U. S. 348 Cummings v. Richmond County Board o Education, 175 U. S. 528; Bolln v. Nebraska, 176 U. S. 83; Clark v. Kansas City, 176 U. S. 114: Weyerhauesser v. Minnesota, 176 U. S. 550; Maxwell v. Dow, 176 U. S. 581: Roller v. Holly, 176 U. S. 398; Adirondack Railway Co. v. New York State, 176 U. S. 335; Petit v. Minnesota, 177 U. S. 164; Grundling v. Chicago, 177 U. S. 183; Ohio Oil Co. v. Indiana, No. 1, 177 U. S. 190; Louisville & Nashville R. R. Co. v. Schmidt, 177 U. S. 230; Saranac Land & Timber Co. v. Comptroller of New York, 177 U. S. 318; Carter v. Texas. 177 U. S. 442; L'Hote v. New Orleans, 177 C. S. 587; Waters-Pierce Oil Co. v. Texas, 177 U. S. 28: Taylor v. Beckham (No. 1), 178 U. S. 548; Sully v. American National Bank, 178 U. S. 289; Wheeler v. N. Y., N. H. & Hartford R. R., 178 U. S. 321; American Sugar Refining Co. v. Louisiana, 179 U. S. 89; New York State v. Barker (No. 1), 179 U. S. 279; Williams v. Fears, 179 U. S. 270; Wisconsin, Minnesota and Pacific Railroad v. Jacobson, 179 U. S. 287: Mason v. Missouri, 179 U. S. 328; McDonald v. Massachusetts, 180 U. S. 311: W. W. Cargill Co. v. Minnesota, 180 U. S. 452; French v. Barber Asphalt Paving Co.. 181 U. S. 324; Wight y. Davidson, 181 U. S. 371; Tonowanda v. Lyon, 181 U. S. 389; Webster v. Fargo, 151 Ú. S. 394; Farrell v. West Chicago Park Commissioners. 181 I. S. 404: Red River Valley Bank v. Craig. 181 U. S. 548; Mallett v. North Carolina, 181 U. S. 589; Simon v. Craft, 182 U. S. 427: Cotting v. Kansas City Stock Yards Company and the State of Kansas, 183 U. S. 79; Storti v. Massachusetts, 183 U. S. 138; Orr v. Gilman, 183 U. S. 278; Florida Central and Peninsular Railroad Co. v. Reynolds, 183 U. S. 471: Louisville & Nashville Railroad Co. v. Kentucky, 183 u. S. 471; Nutting v. Massachusetts. 183 U. S. 553 McChord v. Louisville & Nashville Railroad Co., 183 U. S. 483; King v. Portland City, 184 U. S. 61; Clark v Titusville, 184 U. S. 329; Booth v. Illinois, 184 U. S. 425; Goodrich v. Detroit, 184 U. S. 432; St. Louis Consolidated Coal Co. v. Illinois, 185 U. S. 203; Fidelity Mutual Life Associa tion v. Mettler, 185 U. S. 308; Travelers' Insurance Co. v. Connecticut, 185 U. S. 364; Swafford v. Templeton, 185 U. S. 487; Turpin v. Lemon, 187 U. S. 51; Dreyer v. Illinois, 187 U. S. 71; Reid v. Colorado, 187 U. S. 137; Fidelity & Deposit Co. v. Maryland, 187 U. S. 315; Chadwick v. Kelley, 187 U. S. 540; Otis v. Parker, 187 J. S. 606; Diamond Glue Co. v. U. S. Glue Co., 187 U. S. 611; Billings v. Illinois, 188 U. S. 97: Blackstone v. Miller, 188 U. S. 189; Hooker v. Los Angeles, 188 U. S. 314; Louisville Ferry Co. v. Kentucky, 188 U. S. 399; Williams v. Parker, 188 U. S. 491; Reetz v. Michigan, 188 U. S. 505; Kidd v. Alabama, 188 . S. 730: Glidden v. Harrington, 189 U. S. 255; Farmers' Ins. Co. v. Dabney, 189 U. S. 301; Detroit Ry. v. Osborn, 189 U. S. 383: Patterson v. Bark Eudora. 190 U. S. 169; Howard v. Fleming, 191 U. S. 126: Joplin v. Light Co., 191 U. S. 150; Missouri v. Dockery, 191 U. S. 165; Atkin v. Kansas, 191 U. S. 207; Hibben v. Smith, 191 U. S. 310; Board of Assessors v. Comptoir National, 191 U. S. 388; Arbuckle v. Blackburn, 191 U. S. 405; Cronin v. Adams, 192 U. S. 108; Stanislaus County v. San Joaquin C. & I. Co., 192 U. S. 201; Rogers v. Alabama, 192 U. S. 226; Adams v. New York, 192 U. S. 585; Minneapolis & St. Louis R. R. Co. v. Minnesota, 193 U. S. 53; Leigh v. Green, 193 U. S. 79: Great Southern Hotel Co. v. Jones, 193 U S. 532; Newburyport Water Co. v. Newburyport, 193 U. S. 561; Pope v. Williams. 193 U. S. 621; Cincinnati Street Railway Co. v. Snell, 193 U. S. 30; Rippey v. Texas, 193 U. S. 504: Lloyd v. Dollison, 194 U. S. 445 : Missouri, Kansas & Texas R. R. v. May, 194 U. S. 267; Field v. Barber Asphalt Co., 194 U. S. 618; Fischer v. St. Louis. 194 U. S. 361 ; Pacific Electric Ry. Co. v. Los Angeles, 194 U. S. 112; West v. Louisiana, 194 U. S. 258: Shepard v. Barron, 194 U. S. 553; United States v. Sing Tuck, 194 U. S. 1: Bradley v. Lightcap. 195 U. S. 1; Helena Water Works Co. v. Helena, 185 U. S. 383; Seattle v. Kelleher. 185 U. S. 351: Dobbins v. Los Angeles, 185 U. S. 223; Aikens v. Wisconsin, 195 U. S. 194 Olsen v. Smith, 195 U. S. 332; National Exchange Bank v. Wiley. 195 U. S. 257; Hodge v. Muscatine County, 196 U. S. 276; Corry v. Mayor and Council of Baltimore, 196 U. S. 466; Scottish Union & National Insurance Co. v Bowland, 196 U. S. 611: Cook v. Marshall County, 196 U. S. 261; Coulter v. Louisville & Nashville R. R. Co., 196 U. S. 599; Smiley v. Kansas, 196 U. S. 447; Dawson v. Columbia Trust Co., 197 U. S. 178: Kehrer v. Stewart. 197 U. S. 60: National Cotton Oil Co. v. Texas, 197 U. S. 115; Dallemagne v. Moisan, 197 U. S. 169: New Orleans Gas Co. v. Drainage Commission, 197 U. S. 453: Louisville & Nashville R. R. Co. v. Asphalt Co., 197 T. S. 430; Jacobson Massachusetts, 197 U. S. 11; Iron Cliffs Co. v. Negaunee Iron Co., 197 U. S. 463; Matter of Heff (Indian). 197 U. S. 488; Muhlker v. New York & Harlem R. R. Co., 197 U. S. 544 ; Lochner v. New York, 198 U. S. 45; Clark v. Nash, 198 U. S. 361: Cunnius v. Reading School District, 198 U. S. 458; Delaware, L. R. R. Co. v. Pennsylvania, 198 U. S. 341: Savannah. Thunderboldt Ry, v. Savannah, 198 I. S. 392; Ah Sin v. Wittman, 198 U. S 500; Minnesota Iron Co. v. Kline, 199 U. 593: Carroll v. Greenwich Insurance 199 U. S. 401; Metropolitan Street Ry, v. New York, 199 U. S. 1; Rogers v. Peck, 199 U. S. 425; Lieberman v. Van De Carr, 199 U. S. 552; Jack v. Kansas. 199 U. S. 372: Farrell v. O'Brien, 199 U. S. 89: Kies Γ Lowrey. 199 U. S. 233; Marvin v. Trout. 199 U. S. 212; Union Transit Co. v. Kentucky, V. 199 U. S. 194; Gardner v. Michigan, 199 U. S. 325: Jack v. Kansas, 199 U. S. 372; Manigault v. Springs, 199 U. S. 473; Gardner v. Michigan, 199 Ú. S. 325; Reduction Co. v. Sanitary Reduction Works, 199 U. S. 306; Strickley v. Highland Boy Mining Co., 200 U. S. 527; Chicago B. & Q. Co. v. Drainage Commissioners, 200 U. S. 561; Carfer v. Caldwell, 200 Ú. S. 293; Howard v. Kentucky, 200 U. S. 164; Waterworks Co. v. Owensboro, 200 U. S. 38; Martin v. Texas, 200 U. S. 316: Armour Packing Co. v. Lacy, 200 U. S. 226: Campbell v. California, 200 U. S. 87; Felts v. Murphy, 201 U. S. 633; Kentucky v. Powers. 201 U. S. 1; Otis Co. v. Ludlow Felts v. Murphy, 201 U. S. 123; Rowlings v. Georgia, 201 U. S. 638; West Chicago Railroad v. Chicago, 201 U. S. 506; Michigan Central Railroad v. Powers, 201 U. S. 245; St. John v. New York, 201 U. S. 633; Kentucky v. Powers, 201 U. S. 1; Otis Co. v. Ludlow Co., 201 U. S. 140; Soper v. Lawrence Brothers. 201 U. S. 359; Devine v. Los Angeles, 202 I. S. 313; Cox v. Texas, 202 U. S. 446; National Council v. State Council, 203 U. S. 151; St. Mary's Petroleum Co. v. West Virginia. 203 U. S. 183; Northwestern Life Ins. Co. v. Riggs, 203 U. S. 243; Atlantic Coast Line v. Florida, 203 U. S. 254; Martin v. Pittsburg & Lake Erie R. R., 203 U. S. 284; Western Turf Association v. Greenberg, 204 U.S. 359: Cosmopolitan Club v. Virginia. 208 I. S. 378: Hairston v. Danville & Western Railway, 208 U. S. 598; Northern Pacific Railway v. Duluth, 208 U. S. 583; Disconto Gesellschaft v. Umbreit, 208 U. S. 570; Ughbanks v. Armstrong, 208 U. S. 481; Ughbanks V. Armstrong, 208 U. S. 481; Muller v. Oregon. 208 U. S. 412; Darnell & Son v. Memphis, 208 U. S. 113; Thompson v. Kentucky, 209 U. S. 340; Central Railroad Co. v. Jersey City, 209 U. S. 473; Longyear v. Toolan, 209 T. S. 414; Hudson Water Co. v. McCarter, 209 U. S. 349: Ex parte Young, 209 U. S. 123: Thompson v. Kentucky. 209 U. S. 340; Lang v. New Jersey, 209 U. S. 467; Londoner v. Denver, 210 U. S. 373; Delmar Jockey Club v. Missouri, 210 U. S. 324; Cleveland, Cincinnati, Railway Co. v. Porter, 210 U. S. 177: Paddell v. City of New York, U. S. 446: Silz v. Hesterberg, 211 U. S. 31; Home Telephone Co. v. Los Angeles, 211 U. S. 265; McLean v. Arkansas, 211 U. S. 539; North American Cold Storage Co. v. Chicago, 211 IS. 306: Lemieux v. Young, 211 U. S. 489; Beers v. Glynn, 211 U. S. 477; Rusch v. John Duncan Co., 211 U. S. 526; Prentis v. Atlantic Coast Line. 211 U. S. 210; Twining v. New Jersey, 211 U. S. 78; Bailey v. Alabama, 211 I. S. 452; Hammond Packing Co. v. Arkansas, 212 U. S. 322; Moyer v. Peabody, 212 U. S. 78; Waters-Pierce Oil Co. v. Texas, 212 U. S. 86; Louisville & Nashville R. R. Co. v. Stock Yards Co.. 212 U. S. 132; Ontario Land Co. v. Yordy, 212 U. S. 152; Wilcox v. Consolidated Gas Co., 212 U. S. 19; Bonner v. Gorman, 213 U. S. 86; Keerl v. Montana, 213 U. S. 135; Welch v. Swasey, 214 U. S. 91: Goodrich v. Ferris, 214 U. S. 71; St. Paul, Minnesota & Manitoba Ry. Co. v. Minnesota, 214 U. S. 497; Scott County Road Co. v. Hines, 215 U. S. 336; Marbles v. Creecy, 215 U. S. 63: Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Kansas, 216 U. S. 1; Missouri Pacific Ry. Kansas, 216 U. S. 262; King v. West Virzinia. 216 U. S. 92; Withnell v. Bush Construction Co., 216 U. S. 603; Laurel Hill Apportionment of representation. Cemetery v. San Francisco, 216 U. S. 358; Board of Assessors v. New York Life Insurance Co., 216 U. S. 517; Southern Ry. Co. v. Greene, 216 C. S. 400; Brown-Forman Co. v. Kentucky, 217 U. S. 563; Grenada Lumber Co. v. Mississippi, 217 U. S. 433; Citizens' National Bank v. Kentucky, 217 U. S. 443; Missouri Pacific Ry. v. Nebraska, 217 U. S. 196; Boston Chamber of Commerce v. Boston, 217 U. S. 189; Fay v. Crozier, 217 U. S. 455; Kidd, Dater & Price Co. v. Musselman Grocer Co., 217 U. S. 461; Southwestern Oil Co. v. Texas, 217 U. S. 114; Standard Oil Co. v. Tennessee, 217 U. S. 413; Williams v. Arkansas, 217 U. S. 79; International Text-Book Co. v. Pigg, 217 U. S. 91; Louisville & N. Ry. Co. v. Melton, 218 U. S. 36; ShevlinCarpenter Co. v. Minnesota, 218 U. S. 57; Chiles v. Chesapeake & O. Ry. Co., 218 U. S. 71; Franklin v. South Carolina, 218 U. S. 161; Watson v. Maryland, 218 U. S. 173; Ong Chang Wing v. United States, 218 U. S. 272; Ling Su Fan v. United States, 218 U. S. 302; Cincinnati I. & W. Ry. Co. v. Connersville, 218 U. S. 336; Moffitt v. Kelly, 218 U. S. 400; Western U. Tel. Co. v. Cammercial Milling Co. 218 U. S. 406; Harlin v. McGourin, 218 U. S. 442; United States v. Heinze, 218 U. S. 532; Illinois Central Ry. Co. v. Kentucky. 218 U. S. 551; Griffith v. Connecticut, 218 U. S. 563; Memphis v. Cumberland T. & T. Co., 218 U. S. 624; C. B. & Q. R. R. Co. v. McGuire, 219 U. S. 549; Noble State Bank v. Haskell, 219 U. S. 104; American Land Co. v. Zeiss, 219 U. S. 47; Mobile, Jackson & K. C. R. R. Co. v. Turnipseed, 219 U. S. 35; Bailey v Alabama, 219 U. S. 219; Engel v. O'Malley, 219 U. S. 128; Kentucky Onion Co. v. Kentucky, 219 U. S. 140; Atlantic Coast Line v. Riverside Mills, 219 U. S. 186; Brodnax v. Missouri, 219 U. S. 285; German Alliance Ins. Co. v. Hale, 219 U. S. 307; Chicago R. I. & P. R. R. Co. v. Arkansas, 219 U. S. 453; Assaria State Bank v. Dolley, 219 U. S. 121; House v. Mayes, 219 U. S. 270; Shallenberger v. First State Bank, 219 U. S. 114; Lindsley v. Natural C. G. Co., 220 U. S. 31 S. C. R. 337: Flint v. Stone Tracy Co., 220 U. S. 31 S. C. R. 343; Arnett v. Reade, 220 U. S. - 31 S. C. R. 425; Spirre & H. Co. v. Rhodes, 220 U. S. -; 31 S. Ĉ. R. 490; Texas & N. O. R. R. Co. v. Miller, 220 U. S. —; 31 S. C. R. 534; Texas & N. O. R. R. Co. v. Gross, 220 U. S. -; 31 S. C. R. 536; Grand Trunk U. R. R. Co. v. R. R. Com., 220 U. S. —; S. C. R. 537: Liverpool & L. & G. Ins. Co. v. Board of Assessors, 220 U. S. -; 31 S. C. R. 550; Orient Ins. Co. v. Board of Assessors, 220 U S. - 31 S. C. R. 554; Dowdell v. United States, 220 U. S. — ; 31 S. C. R. 590. Ex Decisions of Nevada Supreme Court: Parte Crandall, 1 Nev. 294; State v. Duffy, 7 Nev. 355 (88 A. R. 713) Ex Parte Spinney, 10 Nev. 323, 325, 326, 333-337; State v. Ah Chew, 16 Nev. 50, 58-61 (40 A. R. 488): State v. McKenney, 18 Nev. 194, 195, 209 (2 P. 171); Ex Parte Boyce, 27 Nev. 299. 336, 357 (75 P. 1, 65 L. R. A. 47); Ex Parte Kair, 28 Nev. 433, 439 (82 P. 453); Pyramid L. & S. Co. v. Pierce, 30 Nev. 256 (95 P. 210); Branson v. I. W. W., 30 Nev. 295 (95 P. 354); Ex Parte Pittman, 31 Nev. 52 (99 P. 700, 704, 22 L. R. A. (N. S., 266); State ex rel Sparks v. State Bank & Tr. Co., 31 Nev. 465 (103 P. 408): Russell v. Esmeralda Co., 32 Nev. 304 (107 P. 891, 892). 186. SECTION 2. Representatives shall be apportioned among the several States according to their respective numbers, counting the whole number of persons in each State, excluding Indians not taxed. But when the right to vote at any election for the choice of electors for President and Vice President of the United States, Representatives in Congress, the Executive and Judicial officers of a State, or the members of the Legislature thereof, is denied to any of the male inhabitants of such State, being twenty-one years of age, and citizens of the United States, or in any way abridged, except for participation in rebellion, or other crime, the basis of representation therein shall be reduced in the proportion which the number of such male citizens shall bear to the whole number of male citizens twenty-one years of age in such State. McPherson v. Blacker. 146 U. S. 1. Loyalty as a qualification of Senators and Representatives. 187. SECTION 3. No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may, by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability. Validity of the national debt, etc. 188. SECTION 4. The validity of the public debt of the United States, authorized by law, including debts incurred for payment of pensions and bounties for services in suppressing insurrection or rebellion, shall not be questioned. But neither the United States nor any State shall assume or pay any debt or obligation incurred in aid of insurrection or rebellion against the United States, or any claim for the loss or emancipation of any slave; but all such debts, obligations and claims shall be held illegal and void. 189. SECTION 5. The Congress shall have power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article. ARTICLE XV.1 Suffrage not to be abridged for race, color, etc. 190. SECTION 1. The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of race, color, or previous condition of servitude. 191. SECTION 2. The Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation. United States v. Reece, 92 U. S. 214: United States v. Cruikshank, 92 U. S. 542; Ex Parte Yarbrough, 110 U. S. 651: Neal v. Delaware, 103 U. S. 370; United States v. Waddell, 112 U. S. 76: McPherson v. Blacker. 146 U. S. 1: James v. Bowman, 190 U. S. 127; Hodges v. United States. 203 U. S. 1: Chiles v. Chesapeake & O. Ry. Co. 218 U. S. 71. 1 The fifteenth amendment to the Constitution of the United States was proposed to the legislatures of the several States by the Fortieth Congress on the 27th of February, 1869, and was declared, in a proclamation of the Secretary of State, dated March 30, 1870, to have been ratified by the legislatures of twenty-nine of the thirty-seven States. The dates of these ratifications (arranged in the order of their reception at the Department of State) were: From North Carolina, March 5, 1869; West Virginia, March 3, 1869; Massachusetts, March 9-12, 1869: Wisconsin, March 9, 1869: Maine, March 12, 1869; Louisiana, March 5, 1869; Michigan, March 8, 1869; South Carolina, March 16, 1869; Pennsylvania. March 26, 1869; Arkansas, March 30, 1869; Connecticut, May 19, 1869; Florida, June 15, 1869; Illinois, March 5, 1869; Indiana, May 13-14, 1869; New York, March 17-April 14, 1869 (and the legislature of the same State passed a resolution January 5, 1870, to withdraw its consent to it); New Hampshire, July 7, 1869; Nevada, March 1, 1869; Vermont, October 21, 1869; Virginia, October 8, 1869 ; Missouri, January 10, 1870; Mississippi. January 15-17, 1870; Ohio, January 27, 1870; Iowa. February 3, 1870'; Kansas, January 18-19, 1870 Minnesota. February 19, 1870; Rhode Island. January 18, 1870; Nebraska. February 17, 1870: Texas, February 18, 1870. The State of Georgia also ratified the amendment February 2, 1870. ACT OF CONGRESS ORGANIZING THE TERRITORY OF NEVADA AN ACT TO ORGANIZE THE TERRITORY OF NEVADA [Approved March 2, 1861] The organic act, in a territory, to some extent, stands in the place of a constitution. Sawyer v. Hayden, 1 Nev. 79. Boundaries- California may cede-Rights of Indians-Territory may be divided. 192. Be it enacted, by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That all that part of the territory of the United States, included within the following limits, to-wit:Beginning at the point of intersection of the forty-second degree of north latitude with the thirty-ninth degree of longitude west from Washington; thence, running south on the line of said thirty-ninth degree of west longitude, until it intersects the northern boundary line of the territory of New Mexico; thence due west, to the dividing ridge separating the waters of Carson Valley from those that flow into the Pacific; thence on said dividing ridge northwardly to the forty-first degree of north latitude; thence due north to the southern boundary line of the state of Oregon; thence due east to the point of beginning, be, and the same is hereby, erected into a temporary government, by the name of the territory of Nevada; provided, that so much of the territory within the present limits of the state of California, shall not be included within this territory until the state of California shall assent to the same, by an act irrevocable without the consent of the United States; provided, further, that nothing in this act contained shall be construed to impair the rights of person or property now pertaining to the Indians in said territory, so long as such rights shall remain unextinguished by treaty between the United States and such Indians, or to include any territory which, by treaty with any Indian tribe, is not, without the consent of said tribe to be included within the territorial limits, or jurisdiction of any state or territory, but all such territory shall be excepted out of the boundaries, and constitute no part of the territory of Nevada, until said tribe shall signify their assent to the President of the United States, to be included within the said territory, or to affect the authority of the government of the United States to make any regulations respecting such Indians, their lands, property, or other rights, by treaty, law, or otherwise, which it would have been competent for the government to make if this act had never passed; provided, further, that nothing in this act contained shall be construed to inhibit the government of the United States from dividing said territory into two or more territories, in such manner and at such times as Congress shall deem convenient and proper, or from attaching any portion thereof to any other territory or state. The courts of this state have no jurisdiction to try an Indian belonging to a tribe which is recognized and treated as such by the government of the United States, having its chief and tribal laws, for killing another Indian belonging to the same tribe. State v. McKenney, 1x Nev. 182. 193. As both Indians were under the authority and subjection of such tribal laws, the authorities of the tribe alone have the right to take cognizance of the crime. It is not the intention of the legislature that the territorial or state laws defining crime and providing for their punishment should apply to crimes committed by Indians against each other, living in their tribal relations. The courts of this state could only obtain jurisdiction of such offenses by an affirmative act of the legislature, or a self enacting clause of the constitution. State v. McKenney, 18 Nev. 182, 193. Executive power-Commander-in-chief-Superintendent of Indian affairs-Governor, powers of. 193. SEC. 2. And be it further enacted, That the executive power and authority in and over said territory of Nevada, shall be vested in a governor, |