Decisions of the Commissioner of Patents and of the United States Courts in Patent and Trade-mark and Copyright CasesU.S. Government Printing Office, 1958 - Copyright "Compiled from Official gazette. Beginning with 1876, the volumes have included also decisions of United States courts, decisions of Secretary of Interior, opinions of Attorney-General, and important decisions of state courts in relation to patents, trade-marks, etc. 1869-94, not in Congressional set." Checklist of U. S. public documents, 1789-1909, p. 530. |
Contents
| 32 | |
| 56 | |
| 59 | |
| 61 | |
| 106 | |
| 112 | |
| 114 | |
| 123 | |
| 239 | |
| 247 | |
| 256 | |
| 262 | |
| 263 | |
| 277 | |
| 278 | |
| 283 | |
| 133 | |
| 136 | |
| 146 | |
| 151 | |
| 155 | |
| 160 | |
| 167 | |
| 225 | |
| 315 | |
| 317 | |
| 366 | |
| 389 | |
| 394 | |
| 395 | |
| 403 | |
| 415 | |
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
44 CCPA acid acrylic acid affidavit affirmed alleged apparatus APPEAL from Patent appealed claims appellant appellant's application appellee appellee's applicant's Associate Judges bentonite Board of Appeals Board of Patent C. C. P. A. Patents cerium Chief Judge cited Commissioner of Patents compounds comprising Conner considered copolymer counsel count Court of Customs Customs and Patent decision delivered the opinion device dice disclosed disclosure District Court double patenting elements evidence fact filing date held indicia instant invention inventor involved issue JACKSON retired junior party mark material metal methacrylic acid O'CONNELL olivine Oral argument Patent Appeals Patent Interferences Patent Office place of COLE plate polyamides polymers portion Primary Examiner prior art priority question recalled to participate recited record reduction to practice registration result rubber Rule shim silica sodium bicarbonate specification subject matter supra tests tion trademark United States Court unpatentable USPQ WORLEY
Popular passages
Page 364 - The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor of carrying out his invention.
Page 439 - The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention.
Page 295 - An element in a claim for a combination may be expressed as a means or step for performing a specified function without the recital of structure, material, or acts in support thereof, and such claim shall be construed to cover the corresponding structure, material, or acts described in the specification and equivalents thereof.
Page 337 - process" means process, art or method, and includes a new use of a known process, machine, manufacture, composition of matter, or material.
Page 113 - In determining how far the federal government may go in controlling intrastate transactions upon the ground that they "affect" interstate commerce, there is a necessary and well-established distinction between direct and indirect effects. The precise line can be drawn only as individual cases arise, but the distinction is clear in principle.
Page 77 - In like manner any patentee or applicant may disclaim or dedicate to the public the entire term, or any terminal part of the term, of the patent granted or to be granted.
Page 105 - Any party to an interference dissatisfied with the decision of the board of patent interferences on the question of priority, may have remedy by civil action...
Page 114 - The stockyards are but a throat through which the current flows, and the transactions which occur therein are only incident to this current from the West to ,the East, and from one state to another.
Page 286 - ... (b) the invention was patented or described in a printed publication in this or a foreign country or in public use or on sale in this country, more than one year prior to the date of the application for patent in the United States...
Page 153 - This is an appeal from the decision of the Board of Patent Interferences of the United States Patent Office awarding priority of invention of the subject matter of Interference No.