The New Zealand Law Journal: NZLJ.Butterworths, 1997 - Law |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 78
Page 399
... decision . Does this explain the almost incomprehensible obtuseness of MAF in the matter of enforcement ? It is important to note that decisions made by the Deputy Director - General or the Director - General under s 21 ( 1 ) of the ...
... decision . Does this explain the almost incomprehensible obtuseness of MAF in the matter of enforcement ? It is important to note that decisions made by the Deputy Director - General or the Director - General under s 21 ( 1 ) of the ...
Page 420
... decisions should be certain , consistent and pre- dictable . Excessive weight should not be given to notions of justice and fairness . Mr Kerr argued that the reason for the current standard of decision making in New Zealand resi- dent ...
... decisions should be certain , consistent and pre- dictable . Excessive weight should not be given to notions of justice and fairness . Mr Kerr argued that the reason for the current standard of decision making in New Zealand resi- dent ...
Page 422
... decisions of the Court of Ap- peal that the quality of decision making in the Court of Appeal must be im- proved . In most jurisdictions , appellate Courts overturn about a third to a half of the decisions before them . About 40 per ...
... decisions of the Court of Ap- peal that the quality of decision making in the Court of Appeal must be im- proved . In most jurisdictions , appellate Courts overturn about a third to a half of the decisions before them . About 40 per ...
Contents
Lawyers and accountants where | 7 |
Advertising Manager | 36 |
Elisabeth Burgess | 72 |
Copyright | |
10 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
accepted action activities allow application approach Australian authority benefit Bill breach cause claim common concerned considered constitution contract costs Council course Court of Appeal criminal damages dealing decision defendant discussion duty effect established evidence example existing expressed fact further give given held High Court House important interest interpretation involved issue Judge judgment judicial justice land lawyers legislation liability limited Lord majority matter means ment nature noted NZLR obligations offence particular parties person plaintiff position practice present principle problem procedure proceedings protection question reasonable recent referred regard relation relationship responsibility result risk rule shares Society standard suggested taken tion tort trade trial trust University victims Zealand