Lake Shore R. R. Co., Boston Chamber of

Commerce v. 354, 391, 462, 604, (Opinion) 754 Larrison v. Chicago & G.T. R. Co.,(Opinion) 369 Leggett v. Baltimore & O. R. R. Co. - 396, 684 v. Delaware, L. & W. R. Co. 396 New York Cent. & H. R. R. Co. v. - 396 v. New York, L. E. & W. R. Co. - 396 v. Pennsylvania R. Co. 396 Lehigh & Hudson R. R. R. Co., Howell v. 467 Lehigh Valley R. R. Co. v. Philadelphia & R. R. R. Co. Leonard v. Union Pacific R. Co.

62,

315 472, (Opinion) 627 Lincoln Board of Trade v. Burlington & M. R. R. R. Co.

v. Chicago, B. & Q. R. R. Co. v. Denver & R. G. R. R. Co.

v. Rio Grande W. R. R. Co. Southern Pacific Co. v. v. Union Pac. R. Co. List v. Commonwealth (Sup. Ct. Pa.)

647

647

702

(Opinion) 784

(Opinion) 621

21
23

Little Rock & F. S. R. Co. v. Hanniford
(Opinion) 580
Louisville & Nashville R. R. Co., Re, 16-
(Opinion) 278
Dunbar's Sons & Co. v.
592
Keith v.
316, (Opinion) 601
Kentucky & Indiana Bridge Co. v.703,715
Rice v. 354, 376, 443, (Opinion), 722
Louisville, N. A. & C. R. Co., Allen v. 586,

Louisville, N. O. & T. R. R. Co., Re
Lumber Co., Re Pacific Pine

Chicago, R. I. & P. R. Co. v. 291,

Detroit Board of Trade v.

New Orleans C. & T. P. R. Co., New Or-
leans Cotton Exch. v.
New Orleans, Proceedings at
Newport News & M. V. R. R. Co., Rice v.
481, 482, (Opinion) 722
New York & N. E. R. R. Co., Hartford &
N. Y. Transp. Co. v.
314
New York Cent. & H. R. R. R. Co., Re 63
Boston Chamber of Commerce v.

648

179

(Opinion) 754

293, (Opinion) 357

701

M.

New York, L. E. & W. R. R. Co., How

ell v.

467

(Opinion) 382

Pennsylvania, Philadelphia & S. Mail
Steamship Co. v. (U. S. Sup. Ct.)
(Opinion) 308

Pennsylvania R. Co., Leggett v.
Worcester Excursion Car Co. v.
Brady v.

396

Chicago & A. R. R. Co. v.

Commercial Exch. of Phila. v.
Delaware State Grange v.

Thurber v.

(Opinion) 357

778

649

397

481,

(U. S. Sup. Ct.)

(Opinion) 31

Philadelphia Commercial Exch. v. Erie

Despatch

778,821

(Opinion) 722 v. Mobile & O.R.Co. - 479, (Opinion) 722 v. New Orleans & N. R. Co. v. Newport News & M. V. R. R. Co. 481, 482, (Opinion) 722 v. St. Louis, I. M. & S. R. Co. 478, (Opinion) 722 v. Vicksburg & M. R. R. Co. 604 v. Western New York & P. R. Co. 717, 792, 795, 811 Richmond & A. R. R. Co. Re Richmond & D. R. R. Co., Crews v.

811 649, 810

650 Reynolds v. Western New York & P. R. R. Co. - 600, (Opinion) 685 Rice v. Alabama Great S. R. Co. 604 v. Buffalo, N. Y. & P. R. R. Co. 717 v. Chesapeake, O. & S. W. R. Co. 482 v. Cincinnati, N. O. & T. P. R. Co. - 480, 481, 604, 605, (Opinion) 722 v. East Tenn., Va. & Ga. R. Co. 479 v. Illinois Central R. R. Co. 482, (Opinion) 722

v. Louisville & N. R. R. Co. 354, 376,

443, (Opinion) 722 v. Mississippi & T. R. R. Co.

Reed v. Oregon Railway & Nav. Co. 314,
328, (Opinion) 641
Religious Teachers, Re
Rend v. Chicago & N. R. Co.
Report of Commission to Secretary of In-
terior (Annual)

21

793, 812

Richmond & W. P. Terminal & Ware-
house Co., Heck v. - 498, (Opinion) 775
Riddle, Dean & Co. v. Baltimore & Ohio
R. R. Co.

(Opinion) 701, 778 v. New York, L. E. & W. R. R. Co.

(Opinion) 371 Philadelphia & S. Mail Steamship Co. v. Pennsylvania (U. S. Sup. Ct.) (Opinion) 308 Philadelphia, W. & B. R. R. Co., Delaware State Grange v. 649 Pittsburg & Ft. Wayne R. Co., Swift v. 294 Pittsburgh & L. E. R. R. Co., Riddle, Dean & Co., v. - 601, 688, (Opinion) 773 Pittsburgh, C. & St. L. R. Co., Commer(Opinion) 787 778 v. Pittsburgh & L. E. R. R. Co. 601, 316, (Opinion) 601 (Opinion) 688, 773 810 Rio Grande W. R. R. Co., Lincoln Board Planters Transportation Co. v. James of Trade v. 647 (U. S. Ct. Ct.) (Opinion) 599 Robbins v. Taxing Dist. of Shelby Co. Plummer, Perry & Co. v. Southern Pac. Co. - 648 (U. S. Sup. Ct.) (Opinion) 45 v. Union Pac. R. Co. - 596, 648 Rule as to Applications to Commission 15 Pratt, State v. (Sup. Ct. of Vt.) - (Opinion) 299 Rutland, Vt., Proceedings at 500 Procedure of Commission 410

St. Louis, I. M. & S. R. Co., Rice v. 478, | Traders & Travelers Union v. Philadelphia

& R. R. R. Co. (Opinion) 371 22 Traders Dispatch, Commercial Exch, of 315 Phila. v. Trade Union, Boards of, v. Chicago, M. & St. P. R. Co. (Opinion) 608 Traffic Combinations, Filing Copies of Joint Tariff Transportation Co., Hartford & N. Y., v.

601 Trunk Lines, Re

Baltimore & O. R. R. Co. v. Maryland, 88 U. S.
43
21 Wall. 456 (22 L. ed. 678)..
Bank of Augusta v. Earle, 38 U. S. 13 Pet. 519 (10
L. ed. 274).
429, 787
Bartemeyer v. Iowa, 85 U. S. 18 Wall. 129 (21 L. ed.
929)
Beer Co. v. Massachusetts, 97 U. S. 25, 33 (24 L. ed.
989, 992).

787

Germania Life Ins. Co. v. Commonwealth, 85 Pa. 513 Gibbons v. Ogden, 22 U. S. 9 Wheat. 1, 195, 203, 205 (6 L. ed. 23, 70, 71, 72)..37, 46, 390, 831, 836, 838 835 Gilman v. Phila., 70 U. S. 3 Wall. 713, 728, 730 (18 L. ed. 96, 100, 101)....40, 307, 441, 828, 836, 839 Girardot v. Midland R. Co., 4 R. & Can. Traf. 835 Cas. 291.. 747 Gloucester Ferry Co. v. Pa., 114 U. S. 196, 203, 204, 217 (29 L. ed. 158, 161, 162, 166). 34, 42, 46, 57, 307, 312, 430, 803 Goldsmith v. Home Ins. Co., 62 Ga. 379.. Granite State Mut. Aid Asso. v. Porter, 58 Vt. 581. 803 Great Western R. Co. v. McCarthy, 29 Am. & Eng. R. R. Cas. 87.. v. Sutton, L. R. 4 Eng. & Ir. App. 239.. 747 Guy v. Baltimore, 100 U. S. 434 (25 L. ed. 743).. 313

Brooklyn, C. & N. R. R. Co. v. Nat. Bank of Re-
public, 102 U.S. 14 (28 L. ed. 61).
809
Brown v. Houston, 114 U. S. 622, 631 (29 L. ed. 257,
260).
42, 46, 48, 313
v. Maryland, 25 U. S. 12 Wheat. 419, 420, 436,
446 (6 L. ed. 678, 684, 688).. 37, 46, 56, 300,
310, 313, 833, 835, 836
Butchers Union Co. v. Crescent City Co., 111 U. S.
838
746, 751 (28 L. ed. 585, 587)...

803

738

C.

H.

Cardwell v. Am. Bridge Co., 113 U. S. 205 (28 L. ed.
959)
Carpenter v. Providence Washington Ins. Co. 41
U. S. 16 Pet. 495 (10 L. ed. 1044)..
809
Chicago & A. R. Co. v. Pierson, 12 Am. & Eng.
R. Cas. 156.
581
Chicago, B. & Q. R. Co. v. Cutts, 94 U. S. 155 (24
L. ed. 94).
33, 34, 35, 44
Chicago etc. R. R. Co. v. Fuller, 84 U. S. 17 Wall.
560, 567, 569 (21 L. ed. 710, 713, 714)..41, 44, 581
v. Iowa, 94 U. S. 163 (24 L. ed. 96)
v. People, 67 Ill. 24.

840

581 747

Hays v. Pacific Mail Steamship Co., 58 U. S. 17
How. 596 (15 L. ed. 254)
386
Henderson v. Mayor of N. Y., 92 U. S. 259, 272 (23
L. ed. 543, 549)..
.46, 307, 389, 829, 832
Home Insurance Co. v. Morse, 87 U. S. 20 Wall.
445, 456 (22 L. ed. 365, 369).
Houston etc. R. R. Co. v. Harry, 18 Am. & Eng.
R. Cas. 502.

298

581 581

Coe v. Errol, 116 U. S. 517 (29 L. ed. 715). 42, 313
Cook v. Pa., 97 U. S. 566, 574 (24 L. ed. 1015, 1018)
37,313, 833
Cooley v. Port Wardens, 53 U. S. 12 How. 299, 318
(13 L. ed. 996, 1004)....41, 46, 307, 311, 381, 828
Crandall v. Nevada, 73 U. S. 6 Wall. 35, 42 (18 L.

ed. 745, 746).....41, 43, 46, 55, 56, 307, 311, 828

D.

Daniel Ball, The, 77 U. S. 10 Wall. 557, 564 (19 L.
ed. 999, 1001).
.30, 34, 441

Davis v. State, 3 Lea (Tenn.) 379.
Denaby Main Colliery Co. v. M. S. & L. Railway
Co., L. R. 10 H. of L. 97; 26 Am. & Eng.
R. R. Cas. 293.

Humes v. Missouri Pac. R. Co., 82 Mo. 221.
Huse v. Glover, 119 U. S. 543, 546, 549 (30 L. ed. 489,
490).
.381, 840

581

K.

320

Kellogg v. Union Co., 12 Conn. 7..
Keokuk etc. Packet Co. v. Keokuk etc., 95 U. S.
80 (24 L. ed. 377); 100 U. S. 428 (25 L. ed.
690); 105 U. S. 563 (26 L. ed. 1171); 107 U.S.
698 (27 L. ed. 587); 121 U. S.-
313
Koehler, Ex parte, 23 Fed. Rep. 529; 25 Fed. Rep.
73, 76.
29, 30, 318, 319
Kohl v. U. S. 91 U. S. 367 (23 L. ed. 449).

389

443

E.

L.

Ehrman v. Teutonia Ins. Co., 1 McCrary, 126.... 803
Escanaba Co. v. Chicago, 107 U. S. 678, 682 (27 L.
ed. 442, 444).
40, 381, 441, 839
Evans v. Oregon R. & Nav. Co., 1 Inters. Com.
Com. Rep. 336, 641..
747

Lafayette Ins. Co. v. French, 59 U.S. 18 How. 404,
407 (15 L. ed. 340, 451, 452).
299, 803
License Cases, 46 U. S. 5 How. 504, 599, 619 (12 L.
ed. 256, 299, 308).....714, 715, 827, 831, 835, 840
Lotspeich v. Cent. R. Georgia, 73 Ala. 306..... 747

B.

Baltimore & O. R. R. Co. v.
21 Wall. 456 (22 L. ed
Bank of Augusta v. Earle, 38
L. ed. 274).
Bartemeyer v. Iowa, 85 U. S. 1
929)
Beer Co. v. Massachusetts, 97
989, 992)
Brooklyn, C. & N. R. R. Co.
public, 102 U.S. 14 (2
Brown v. Houston, 114 U. S. 6
260).

Butchers Union Co. v. Cresce 746, 751 (28 L. ed. 585

C.

Cardwell v. Am. Bridge Co., 959) Carpenter v. Providence Wa U.S. 16 Pet. 495 (10) Chicago & A. R. Co. v. Piers R. Cas. 156.. Chicago, B. &Q. R. Co. v. Cu L. ed. 94). Chicago etc. R. R. Co. v. Ful 560, 567, 569 (21 L. ed v. Iowa, 94 U. S. 163 (24 v. People, 67 Ill, 24... Coe v. Errol, 116 U. S. 517 (29 Cook v. Pa., 97 U. S. 566, 574 Cooley v. Port Wardens, 53 (13 L. ed. 996, 1004). Crandall v. Nevada, 73 U. S ed. 745, 746).....41,

D.

Daniel Ball, The, 77 U. S. 10 ed. 999, 1001). Davis v. State, 3 Lea (Tenn Denaby Main Colliery Co. Co., L. R. 10 H. of R. R. Cas. 293... v. Manchester S. & L. Cas. 97.. District, The, v. Waggama Mackey, 333 Doyle v. Continental Insu (24 L. ed. 148). Ducat v. Chicago, 77 U. S. ed. 972, 973)....

E

Ehrman v. Teutonia Ins. (
Escanaba Co. v. Chicago,
ed. 442, 444).
Evans v. Oregon R. & Nay
Com. Rep. 336,
INTER S.